MeetingsMon, Jun 15, 20264h 31m2022–2026 Council
Special Council
Summary
- Gave first, second and third readings to Amenity Cost Charge and Inclusionary Zoning bylaws (Bylaws 2275, 2270, 2271)
- Gave first, second and third readings to Omnibus new residential zones and Small-Scale Multi‑Unit Housing bylaws (Bylaws 2274, 2273)
- Approved the Arts and Cultural Development Strategy; maintained $10,000 West Shore Arts Council funding; not joining CRD Arts Service
- Directed staff to notify public Council will consider a development variance permit for Atkins/Winster properties; Guiry opposed
Decisions
What council voted on, in agenda order.
Issued development variance permit raising rear fence to 3.4 m at 1436 Pinehurst Place.
8.1 · DVP26-0001 - 1436 Pinehurst Place
Vote 6–0Moved by Wagner, seconded by GuiryAdopted Arts and Culture Strategy and kept West Shore Arts Council funding at $10,000.
9.1 · Arts & Culture Strategy
Vote 6–0Moved by Wagner, seconded by MorleyReceived the Waste Management NRFP Scope staff report for information.
9.3 · Waste Management NRFP Scope
Vote 6–0Moved by Yacucha, seconded by HarderDirected staff to notify public of DVP consideration for Atkins Ave and Winster Rd sites.
9.4 · Development Variance Permit Application - 698, 678, 674 Atkins Ave, and 2792, 2788 Winster Rd
Moved by Harder, seconded by WagnerGave first to third readings to amenity cost charge, inclusionary zoning and reserve fund bylaws.
11.1 · Bylaw NOS. 2275, 2270 & 2271 - Amenity Cost Charge & Inclusionary Zoning & Reserve Funds Amendment
Moved by Yacucha, seconded by WagnerGave first to third readings to zoning amendments creating new residential and small multi-unit housing.
11.2 · Bylaw NOS. 2274 & 2273 - Zoning Amendments (New Residential Zones & Small-Scale Multi-Unit Housing)
Vote 6–0Moved by Wagner, seconded by MorleyGave first readings to OCP and zoning amendments for 602 Madrona Place.
11.3 · Bylaw NOS. 2253 & 2254 - OCP & Zoning Amendment (602 Madrona Place)
Vote 6–0Moved by Wagner, seconded by Guiry
Agenda
18 items · select one for details, debate and documents
Summary
Mayor called the meeting to order.
Motions (1)
Mayor called the meeting to order.
Summary
Councillor read the City's territorial acknowledgement.
Summary
Council approved the agenda as presented.
Debate
Approval of the agenda was moved by Councillor Guiry and seconded (routine). No debate recorded.
Motions (1)
THAT Council approve the agenda as presented.
Summary
Three consultant presentations: Transportation Master Plan/ATP; Waste Management NRFP Scope; Amenity Cost Charge and Inclusionary Zoning bylaws.
Debate
Presentations were given by Watts Consulting (Transportation TMP/ATP), Dillon Consulting (Waste Management NRFP scope), and Modus Consulting (Amenity Cost Charge & Inclusionary Zoning). Substantive Q&A followed each presentation; public concerns were recorded later in Public Participation.
Summary
Members of the public addressed Council on items including the Arts & Culture Strategy, the 2025 Annual Report, the Waste Management NRFP Scope, and several bylaws and development items.
Who spoke (5)
- J. CullingtonSupports · Arts and culture strategy
Supports the arts strategy and school co-location only if the theatre is municipally or community owned and operated, noting school venues limit access and funding. - Frazer JohnsonSupports · 2025 annual report
States: Praises inclusion of revitalization tax exemptions in the annual report, saying disclosure of more than $1.8 million in exemptions improves taxpayer transparency. - F. PerkinsAsks · West Shore community theatre
Asks council to explore a municipally or community-operated theatre co-located with North Langford Secondary and continue investigating other West Shore theatre options. - Malcolm McNaughtonMixed · Waste services, development charges, and affordable housing
States: Prefers private waste collection, requests development charges at building permit, and urges housing-policy alignment with higher-government programs and attention to resale challenges. - Wendy Hobbs (Luxton Road)Asks · Waste services
Asks council to defer the waste-service decision until after the election, citing limited survey responses, a proposed seven-year contract, and costly access to complaints.
Summarized from the meeting video. Names use checked registry spellings; unconfirmed names appear as “A resident”.
Debate
Public input included support for the Arts & Culture Strategy, comments on the location/design of a proposed theatre, appreciation for the 2025 Annual Report updates, and concerns about the Waste Management NRFP scope (timing and impacts). Several residents asked Council to delay any final decisions on a municipal curbside program until more information is available.
Motions (1)
THAT Council reopen public participation at 8:48 pm for one more speaker.
Summary
Council adopted the recommended Consent Agenda items (two minutes records).
Motions (1)
THAT Council adopt the recommendations for each item of the Consent Agenda as presented: Minutes of the Special Council Meeting - June 1, 2026 (ADOPT); Minutes of the Council Meeting - June 1, 2026 (ADOPT).
Summary
Council issued Development Variance Permit DVP26-0001 to increase fence height along the rear property line at 1436 Pinehurst Place.
Location
1436 Pinehurst Place
Debate
Council reviewed the development variance request and moved to issue the DVP with the conditions and rationale provided by staff. Motion was carried without recorded division.
Motions (1)
THAT Development Variance Permit No. DVP26-0001 be issued by Council for the City of Langford to Ryan Allman to increase the allowable fence height along the rear property line at 1436 Pinehurst Place subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Variance The following regulations of Zoning Bylaw No. 300 be varied pursuant to section 498 of the Local Government Act: a) THAT Section 3.21.03(4)(a)(1) be varied to increase the allowable height of a fence along the rear lot line from 1.8 m (5.9 ft) to 3.4 m (11.1 ft).
Documents (2)
Development Variance Permit authorizing an increase in allowable rear fence height for the property at 1436 Pinehurst Place (DVP26-0001).
CITY OF LANGFORD
Text not available.
Page 13Public notice of intent to consider Development Variance Permit DVP26-0001 for 1436 Pinehurst Place at the June 15, 2026 meeting, with participation instructions.
Notice of Intent
Text not available.
Page 14Summary
Council approved the Arts and Cultural Development Strategy and directed staff on next steps including not joining the CRD arts funding service at this time and maintaining West Shore Arts Council funding in 2026 at $10,000 while reviewing service delivery.
Financial impact
$10,000— 2026 operating budget (cultural supports)
Debate
Council supported the strategy and directed staff to engage partners and consultants to pursue a West Shore regional approach, while declining to join the CRD Arts Funding Service at this time and maintaining current West Shore Arts Council funding for 2026.
Motions (1)
THAT Council approve the Arts and Cultural Development Strategy as presented; AND THAT Council direct staff to advise the CRD that the City of Langford will not be joining the CRD Arts Funding Service at this time; AND THAT Council direct staff to advise the West Shore Arts Council that the 2026 funding amount will be maintained at $10,000, while the City reviews the service delivery model provided by the West Shore Arts Council; AND THAT Council direct staff to work a consultant to guide conversations with City of Colwood, Town of View Royal, District of Highlands, District of Metchosin, District of Sooke, West Shore artists/performers, the West Shore Arts Council and Arts and Culture Colwood Society to discuss a refreshed long-term vision for a West Shore regional arts council; AND THAT Council direct staff to work with the Sooke School District to explore opportunities for a performing arts theatre collocated with the proposed North Langford secondary school.
Documents (2)
Staff present the City of Langford Arts and Cultural Development Strategy for Council approval and recommend next steps including maintaining West Shore Arts Council funding and not joining the CRD Arts Funding Service at this time.
Staff Report: Approval of the Arts & Cultural Development Strategy
Text not available.
Page 15–22EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Text not available.
Page 15–22BACKGROUND
Text not available.
Page 15–22COMMENTARY
Text not available.
Page 15–22OBJECTIVES
Text not available.
Page 15–22INTEGRATION WITH OTHER PLANS
Text not available.
Page 15–22WEST SHORE ARTS COUNCIL
Text not available.
Page 15–22A VISION FOR A WEST SHORE THEATRE
Text not available.
Page 15–22A TURNING POINT FOR ARTS AND CULTURE IN LANGFORD
Text not available.
Page 15–22FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Text not available.
Page 15–22LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
Text not available.
Page 15–22STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Text not available.
Page 15–22OPTIONS
Text not available.
Page 15–22SUBMITTED BY
Text not available.
Page 15–22ATTACHMENTS
Text not available.
Page 15–22Comprehensive Arts and Cultural Development Strategy for the City of Langford including background, trends, community profile, facilities assessment, engagement findings, and recommended objectives and actions.
Arts and Culture Strategy (Attachment 1 to staff report 9.1)
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 23
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 24
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 25
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 26
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 27
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 28
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 29
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 30
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 31
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 32
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 33
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 34
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 35
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 36
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 37
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 38
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 39
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 40
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 41
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 42
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 43
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 44
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 45
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 46
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 47
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 48
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 49
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 50
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 51
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 52
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 53
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 54
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 55
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 56
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 57
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 58
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 59
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 60
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 61
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 62
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 63
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 64
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 65
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 66
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 67
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 68
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 69
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 70
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 71
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 72
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 73
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 74
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 75
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 76
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 77
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 78
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 79
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 80
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 81
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 82
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 83
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 84
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 85
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 86
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 87
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 88
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 89
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 90
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 91
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 92
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 93
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 94
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 95
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 96
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 97
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 98
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 99
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 100
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 101
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 102
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 103
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 104
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 105
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 106
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 107
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 108
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 109
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 110
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 111
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 112
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 113
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 114
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 115
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 116
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 117
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 118
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 119
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 120
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 121
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 122
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 123
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 124
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 125
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 126
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 127
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 128
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 129
Text not available.
Page 23–130Page 130
Text not available.
Page 23–130Summary
Council approved the 2025 Annual Report as amended to correct Bylaw Department statistics.
Debate
Council approved the 2025 Annual Report; public participation included appreciation for addition of permissive/revitalization tax exemptions being included for transparency.
Motions (1)
THAT Council approve the 2025 Annual Report as amended with corrected Bylaw statistics.
Documents (1)
Staff report presenting the City of Langford 2025 Annual Report for Council consideration (includes city performance, financial highlights and administrative summaries).
Staff Report: 2025 Annual Report
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 131
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 132
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 133
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 134
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 135
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 136
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 137
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 138
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 139
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 140
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 141
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 142
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 143
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 144
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 145
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 146
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 147
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 148
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 149
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 150
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 151
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 152
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 153
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 154
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 155
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 156
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 157
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 158
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 159
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 160
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 161
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 162
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 163
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 164
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 165
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 166
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 167
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 168
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 169
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 170
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 171
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 172
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 173
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 174
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 175
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 176
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 177 - Part 1 of 3
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 177 - Part 2 of 3
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 177 - Part 3 of 3
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 178
Text not available.
Page 131–179Page 179
Text not available.
Page 131–179Summary
Council received the staff report and consultant analysis on a possible municipally contracted curbside collection model and directed staff to proceed to a negotiated NRFP with Colwood for a possible 2027 phased rollout.
Debate
Council and public questioned opt-out/opt-in options, treatment of strata >6 units, billing mechanisms, potential cost savings, and timing relative to the election. Staff and consultants confirmed modelling assumptions (universal participation for dwellings up to six units) and recommended a negotiated NRFP; the City of Colwood will participate in the NRFP on a non-binding basis.
Motions (1)
THAT Council receive the June 16, 2026 staff report titled Waste Management NRFP Scope for information.
Documents (1)
Report outlining the proposed scope for a New Request for Proposal (NRFP) related to the City's waste management services and seeking Council direction.
Staff Report: Waste Management NRFP Scope
Text not available.
Page 180–205BACKGROUND
Text not available.
Page 180–205COMMENTARY
Text not available.
Page 180–205FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Text not available.
Page 180–205LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
Text not available.
Page 180–205STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Text not available.
Page 180–205OPTIONS
Text not available.
Page 180–205Langford Waste Collection Review Survey - Part 1 of 2
Text not available.
Page 180–205Langford Waste Collection Review Survey - Part 2 of 2
Text not available.
Page 180–205Summary
Council directed staff to provide notice that Council will consider issuing a Development Variance Permit for the noted properties to support an RCMP detachment expansion with a suite of setback and landscaping variances and reduced parking.
Location
698 Atkins Ave
678 Atkins Ave
674 Atkins Ave
2792 Winster Rd
2788 Winster Rd
Debate
Council debated technical siting constraints driven by integrated project delivery and the need to meet a target project cost and schedule for the RCMP building. The Ministry of Transportation & Transit approved the Veterans Memorial Parkway frontage intrusions; sidewalk and frontage improvements remain part of the project. One councillor (K. Guiry) recorded opposition to the motion.
Motions (1)
THAT Council direct staff to provide notice that Council will consider issuing a Development Variance Permit for the properties 698, 678, 674 Atkins Ave, and 2792, 2788 Winster Rd with detailed variances to setbacks, landscaping and parking (including reducing off-street parking to 101 stalls).
Documents (1)
Report regarding a Development Variance Permit application affecting multiple properties on Atkins Avenue and Winster Road, recommending notification that Council will consider issuing the permit.
Staff Report: Development Variance Permit Application - 698, 678, 674 Atkins Ave, and 2792, 2788 Winster Rd
Text not available.
Page 206–213Background
Text not available.
Page 206–213Commentary
Text not available.
Page 206–213Financial Implications
Text not available.
Page 206–213Legal Implications
Text not available.
Page 206–213Options
Text not available.
Page 206–213Submitted By
Text not available.
Page 206–213Concurrence
Text not available.
Page 206–213Appendix A – Proposed Site Map
Text not available.
Page 206–213Appendix B – Location Map
Text not available.
Page 206–213Summary
Council directed the Mayor to send a letter to the Province and local MLAs advocating for continued LGCAP funding and share with regional and provincial officials.
Debate
Notice of Motion introduced — direction to send advocacy letter for continuation of provincial LGCAP funding.
Motions (1)
THAT Council direct the Mayor to send a letter to the Province and local MLAs outlining the need for continued Local Government Climate Action Program (LGCAP) funding and share the letter with the CRD Board of Directors, other BC municipal elected officials and Chief Administrative Officers.
Summary
Council directed staff to provide a one-time $10,000 contribution from the Council Contingency fund toward an endowment fund for a scholarship at Royal Roads University in memory of the late Councillor Lillian Szpak.
Financial impact
$10,000— Council Contingency
Debate
Notice of Motion introduced to establish a memorial scholarship at Royal Roads University with a one-time $10,000 contribution; procedure to be handled by staff.
Motions (1)
THAT Council direct staff to provide a one-time $10,000 financial contribution from the Council Contingency fund towards the creation of an endowment fund for Councillor Lillian Szpak's Scholarship Award at Royal Roads University.
Summary
Council directed staff to work with Canada Post to explore placemaking opportunities that integrate community mailboxes as hubs with seating, notice boards and neighbourhood features.
Debate
Notice of Motion introduced to collaborate with Canada Post on neighbourhood placemaking associated with standard community mailbox installations.
Motions (1)
THAT City of Langford Council direct staff to work with Canada Post to explore using community mailboxes as community hubs and integrating placemaking opportunities including notice boards, seating and other neighbourhood specific initiatives.
Summary
Council gave first, second and third readings to the Amenity Cost Charge bylaw, Inclusionary Zoning bylaw, and Reserve Funds Establishment bylaw amendment to align with provincial legislation and replace the density-bonus framework.
Financial impact
$36,900,000— Future ACC revenues; cash-in-lieu
Debate
Council approved an ACC and IZ approach to replace negotiated density bonusing, with consultants recommending rates that align with current market feasibility; Council directed staff to implement the bylaws and related policy updates, understanding rates will be reviewed as markets evolve.
Motions (1)
THAT Council: Give first, second and third readings to Amenity Cost Charge Bylaw No. 2275, 2026; give first, second and third readings to Inclusionary Zoning Bylaw No. 2270, 2026; direct staff to bring forward any necessary corresponding amendments to POL-0011-PLAN and POL-0166-PLAN; and give first, second and third readings to City of Langford Reserve Fund Establishment Bylaw No. 2271, 2026.
Documents (1)
Background report accompanying proposed bylaws including City of Langford Amenity Cost Charge Bylaw No. 2275, Inclusionary Zoning Bylaw No. 2270, and Reserve Funds Establishment Bylaw Amendment No. 3, Bylaw No. 2271, presented for readings.
Background Report: BYLAW NOS. 2275, 2270 & 2271 (Amenity Cost Charge and Inclusionary Zoning Bylaws)
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 214
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 215
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 216
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 217
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 218
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 219
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 220
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 221
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 222
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 223
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 224
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 225
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 226
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 227
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 228
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 229
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 230
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 231
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 232
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 233
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 234
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 235
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 236
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 237
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 238
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 239
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 240
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 241
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 242
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 243
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 244
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 245
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 246
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 247
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 248
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 249
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 250
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 251
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 252
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 253
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 254
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 255
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 256
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 257
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 258
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 259
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 260
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 261
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 262
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 263
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 264
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 265
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 266
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 267
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 268
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 269
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 270
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 271
Text not available.
Page 214–272Page 272
Text not available.
Page 214–272Summary
Council gave first–third readings to zoning bylaw amendments to create new residential zones and update small-scale multi-unit housing provisions to align with provincial changes to density-bonus rules.
Debate
Council approved the technical rezoning amendments necessary to align the Zoning Bylaw with new provincial requirements; staff characterized the new 'pilot' live-landscaping standards to be applied in the new residential zones and to be reviewed over time.
Motions (1)
THAT Council 1. Give first, second and third reading to Omnibus Bylaw No. 68 — New Residential Zones Bylaw No. 2274, 2026 as drafted; AND 2. Give first, second and third reading to Small-Scale Multi-Unit Housing Bylaw No. 2273, 2026 as drafted.
Documents (1)
Background report for proposed amendments to the Langford Zoning Bylaw to introduce new residential zones and small scale multi-unit housing provisions (Bylaw Nos. 2274 and 2273).
Background Report: BYLAW NOS. 2274 & 2273 (Zoning Bylaw Amendments - New Residential Zones and Small Scale Multi Unit Housing)
Text not available.
Page 273–300Staff Report to Special Council
Text not available.
Page 273–300BACKGROUND
Text not available.
Page 273–300COMMENTARY
Text not available.
Page 273–300FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Text not available.
Page 273–300LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
Text not available.
Page 273–300STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Text not available.
Page 273–300OPTIONS
Text not available.
Page 273–300CITY OF LANGFORD — BYLAW NO. 2274 - Part 1 of 3
Text not available.
Page 273–300CITY OF LANGFORD — BYLAW NO. 2274 - Part 2 of 3
Text not available.
Page 273–300CITY OF LANGFORD — BYLAW NO. 2274 - Part 3 of 3
Text not available.
Page 273–300CITY OF LANGFORD — BYLAW NO. 2273
Text not available.
Page 273–300Summary
Council gave first reading to OCP and Zoning amendments for 602 Madrona Place and directed the matter to proceed to the public hearing process.
Location
602 Madrona Place
Debate
Council moved the application to first reading and will proceed to public hearing. No recorded votes against; standard process continues.
Motions (1)
THAT Council give first reading to "Langford Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2200, Amendment No. 1 (602 Madrona Place), Bylaw No. 2253, 2026"; AND THAT Council give first reading to "Langford Zoning Bylaw No. 300, Amendment No. 757 (602 Madrona Place), Bylaw No. 2254, 2026".
Documents (1)
Background report proposing amendments to the Official Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw for the property at 602 Madrona Place (Bylaw Nos. 2253 and 2254) for first reading.
Background Report: BYLAW NOS. 2253 & 2254 (602 Madrona Place OCP and Zoning Amendments)
Text not available.
Page 301–304CITY OF LANGFORD — BYLAW NO. 2253
Text not available.
Page 301–304CITY OF LANGFORD — BYLAW NO. 2254
Text not available.
Page 301–304Summary
Council adjourned the meeting at 10:33 pm.
Motions (1)
THAT Council adjourn the meeting.