Regular Council

Public hearing cover sheet announcing the November 2, 2020 public hearing for Bylaw No. 1883 to rezone 2627 Sooke Road to allow a 90-unit apartment with one commercial unit.

Text of Bylaw No. 1883 to amend Zoning Bylaw No. 300, rezoning Lot 1, Plan 21459 (2627 Sooke Rd) from R2 to C9 and specifying amenity contribution rates.

Municipal notice describing the public hearing process and how to access materials and make submissions regarding Bylaw No. 1883.

Detailed planning staff report (Jan 27, 2020) describing the rezoning application for 2627 Sooke Road to C9, site context, proposed form and character, requested parking variance, frontage/stormwater requirements, amenity contributions and DCC estimates, with appendices (site plan, maps).

Council staff report updating design changes since first reading and public hearing feedback (traffic access redesign to Sooke Road), recommending conditions including strata titling prior to occupancy and EV charging infrastructure, and confirming terms/conditions for final rezoning.

Collection of resident emails, letters and petitions expressing concerns and objections to the proposed rezoning at 2627 Sooke Road, primarily about traffic, parking overflow onto local streets, safety for children, and reduction in on-site parking.

A resident letter outlining opposition to the rezoning and specific concerns about driveway access to Southglen Drive, parking reductions, traffic increases and building height for the proposed development at 2627 Sooke Road.

A dated (June 29, 2020) resident submission formally opposing Proposed Bylaw No. 1883 (rezoning for the 2627/26278 Sooke Road development), with concerns about access, parking, traffic, and neighbourhood character.

A second/duplicate copy of the resident submission raising the same concerns about the rezoning application for 2627 Sooke Road, including traffic, parking, and building height issues.

An email exchange (including a response from City staff) about where affected residents can voice concerns regarding the 90-unit development proposed at 2627 Sooke Road and the public meeting process.

A duplicate/another copy of the June 29, 2020 resident letter opposing Proposed Bylaw No. 1883 for the Sooke Road development, reiterating concerns about Southglen access and parking.

A resident email to Robert Dykstra (June 28, 2020) from a homeowner on Ernhill Drive objecting to the rezoning, citing street parking overflow, safety, lack of sidewalks, and requesting no through access from local streets.

A forwarded web submission via the City website opposing the rezoning and amendment of Bylaw No. 300 by Proposed Bylaw No. 1883; describes anticipated parking shortfall and significant neighbourhood traffic impacts.

A longer November 2, 2020 resident submission reaffirming opposition to Proposed Bylaw No. 1883 and arguing the development will negatively affect neighbourhood safety, character, and property values; requests reduced unit count and removal of Southglen access.

A short email to Robert Dykstra (June 29, 2020) signaling concern and objection to opening Southglen Drive for vehicle access to 2627 Sooke Road, noting lack of sidewalks, limited visibility and potential property value impacts.

Final pages contain scanned image-only pages (low OCR quality) likely containing additional signature pages or scanned attachments related to the submissions opposing the 2627 Sooke Road rezoning.

A forwarded email to the Langford planning director asking whether the proposal only involves lots 1365 and 2885 and expressing concern that other shaded grey areas (along Lake End Rd) — important bogs — are not being considered for protection.

A resident submission (Oct 31, 2020) opposing rezoning at 2885 West Shore Parkway and 1365 Goldstream Avenue, citing ecosystem damage, increased traffic and noise (including rock crushing), and capacity limits at the north end of Langford Lake.

A homeowner letter (Oct 31, 2020, 1:47 PM) objecting to rezoning multiple parcels northeast of Langford Lake for hotel and townhouses, requesting no access via Goldstream and noting safety concerns due to lack of sidewalks.

A resident email (Oct 31, 2020, 2:45 PM) opposing redevelopment close to Langford Lake, citing threats to wildlife, increased traffic and lack of need for more hotels/restaurants/condos in the area.

A resident message (Oct 31, 2020, 4:15 PM) expressing strong opposition to large-scale development near Langford Lake and warning of irreversible environmental harm.

A long‑time resident's submission (Nov 1, 2020) opposing the proposed hotel, restaurant and 30 townhomes bordering Goldstream Ave and West Shore Parkway, noting lack of advance notice and concerns about ecosystem loss and increased traffic/noise.

A resident email (Nov 2, 2020 10:24 AM) seeking clarification about which parcels are the subject properties (notes discrepancy in documents) and raising environmental concerns about algae blooms, flooding and loss of settling ponds.

A resident letter (Nov 2, 2020 2:48 PM) strongly opposing the proposed zoning change and development for 1365 Goldstream and 2885 Westshore Parkway, questioning access routes and citing bylaw amendment Z20-00016.

Public hearing cover sheet announcing the November 2, 2020 public hearing for Bylaw No. 1931 to rezone 2885 West Shore Parkway and 1365 Goldstream Avenue for a hotel, restaurant and approximately 30 townhouse units.

Text of Bylaw No. 1931 to amend Zoning Bylaw No. 300 to rezone the specified amenity lands to CT1 and RT2 and to add Schedule AD entries specifying amenity contribution rates for the subject lots.

Municipal notice and newspaper/publication advertisements announcing the public hearing and providing contact information and availability of materials for Bylaw No. 1931.