Summary
- Accepted the CRD's new Regional Growth Strategy and recommended its adoption to the CRD Board (Bylaw 4017).
- Expressed interest in exploring commuter train service on the E&N corridor between Langford and Victoria (inter‑municipal study).
- Directed staff to prepare ALR exclusion application and notice for 940 and 960 Latoria Road (school site).
- Approved CRD Water pump station/reservoir at 2131 Bear Mountain Pkwy; land counted toward CD12 open space.
Decisions
What council voted on, in agenda order.
Accepted the proposed Regional Growth Strategy and recommended its adoption to the CRD Board.
4.a · CRD - 2016 Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw 4017 - for Municipal Acceptance - Staff Report (Planning)
Moved by Blackwell, seconded by SifertAllowed CRD Water use of 2131 Bear Mountain Pkwy; counted toward CD12 open space.
4.c · Request to Allow a CRD Water Pump Station and Reservoir on Lands Designated as Open Space in the South Skirt Mountain Master Plan - Staff Report (Planning)
Moved by Szpak, seconded by SifertExpressed interest in exploring commuter rail service on the E&N corridor between Langford and Victoria.
4.d · Commuter Rail - Verbal Update (Mayor Young)
Moved by Szpak, seconded by Sahlstrom
Agenda
8 items · select one for details, debate and documents
Summary
The Chair called the meeting to order at 10:00 am.
Summary
Council moved to approve the agenda as presented.
Motions (1)
That Council Approve the Agenda as presented.
Summary
There was no public participation.
Summary
Council accepted the proposed new Regional Growth Strategy (Bylaw No. 4017) and recommended its adoption to the CRD Board.
Motions (1)
That Council accept the proposed new Regional Growth Strategy as contained in Bylaw No. 4017 and recommend its adoption to the CRD Board.
Documents (4)
Planning staff report seeking Council direction regarding municipal acceptance (or rejection) of the CRD's proposed Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 4017, summarizing changes since the May 2016 review and identifying mapping and policy changes of concern.
Staff Report to Council — Regional Growth Strategy – Capital Regional District
Loading…
Page 3–5Background
Loading…
Page 3–5Commentary
Loading…
Page 3–5Financial Implications
Loading…
Page 3–5Legal Implications
Loading…
Page 3–5Options
Loading…
Page 3–5Respectfully Submitted
Loading…
Page 3–5Single-page graphic/map illustrating proposed changes to the CRD Regional Growth Strategy (Alternative 1) referenced in the staff report attachment.
Regional Growth Strategy — Proposed changes to reflect Alternative 1 (November 9, 2016)
Loading…
Page 6Formal CRD bylaw (No. 4017) to adopt the updated Regional Growth Strategy; includes reading dates and references Schedule A (the RGS document).
CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT
Loading…
Page 7–8BYLAW NO. 4017
Loading…
Page 7–8A BYLAW TO ADOPT A REGIONAL GROWTH STRATEGY FOR THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT
Loading…
Page 7–8The full Capital Regional District Regional Growth Strategy (Schedule A), containing vision, objectives, policies, maps, targets and implementation measures to guide regional growth to 2038.
Regional Growth Strategy (Schedule "A" to Bylaw No. 4017)
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 9
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 10
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 11
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 12
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 13
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 14
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 15
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 16
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 17
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 18
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 19
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 20
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 21
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 22
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 23
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 24
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 25
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 26
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 27
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 28
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 29
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 30
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 31
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 32
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 33
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 34
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 35
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 36
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 37
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 38
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 39
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 40
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 41
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 42
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 43
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 44
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 45
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 46
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 47
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 48
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 49
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 50
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 51
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 52
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 53
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 54
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 55
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 56
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 57
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 58
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 59
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 60
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 61
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 62
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 63
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 64
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 65
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 66
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 67
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 68
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 69
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 70
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 71
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 72
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 73
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 74
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 75
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 76
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 77
Loading…
Page 9–78Page 78
Loading…
Page 9–78Summary
Council directed staff to work with SD62 and property owners to prepare a new ALR exclusion application for 940 and 960 Latoria Road, request ALC reconsideration, and prepare a staff report once notifications and submission are complete.
Location
940 Latoria Road
960 Latoria Road
Motions (1)
That Council: 1. Direct staff to work in conjunction with SD62 and the property owners of 940 and 960 Latoria Rd to prepare a new ALR Exclusion application with regards to those properties, and proceed with the required public notification; and 2. Direct staff to request that the ALC consider amending their conditional approval originally issued in June 2016 for the Block ALR Exclusion application (ALR15-0002) to include 940 and 960 Latoria Rd among those properties identified as "approved for exclusion" as part of the reconsideration currently being undertaken by the ALC; and 3. Direct staff to prepare a staff report to Council with regards to this application once required notification measures are complete and the application is submitted to the City.
Documents (1)
Planning staff report regarding an application to exclude properties at 940 and 960 Latoria Road from the Agricultural Land Reserve in relation to a School District No. 62 school site.
Staff Report — Application to Exclude 940 and 960 Latoria Road from the Agricultural Land Reserve (SD No. 62 School Site)
Loading…
Page 79–81Background
Loading…
Page 79–81Commentary
Loading…
Page 79–81Financial Implications
Loading…
Page 79–81Legal Implications
Loading…
Page 79–81Options
Loading…
Page 79–81Respectfully Submitted
Loading…
Page 79–81Summary
Council agreed to make available LOT 1 SECTION 114 ESQUIMALT DISTRICT PLAN VIP87674 PID 028-155-742 (2131 Bear Mountain Parkway) for a CRD pump station and reservoir and to count those lands toward the CD12 zone open space requirement.
Location
LOT 1 SECTION 114 ESQUIMALT DISTRICT PLAN VIP87674 PID 028-155-742 (2131 Bear Mountain Parkway)
Motions (1)
That Council: 1. Agree to make available to CRD Water that portion of the property legally described as LOT 1 SECTION 114 ESQUIMALT DISTRICT PLAN VIP87674 PID 028-155-742 (2131 Bear Mountain Parkway) required to install a water pump station and reservoir; and 2. Agree that those lands required by CRD Water for the pump station and reservoir shall be counted towards the requirement to provide 40% of the lands within the CD12 Zone as open space.
Documents (1)
Planning staff report considering a request to permit placement of a CRD water pump station and reservoir on lands designated as Open Space under the South Skirt Mountain Master Plan (related to Bear Mountain Parkway).
Staff Report to Council
Loading…
Page 82–84Background
Loading…
Page 82–84Commentary
Loading…
Page 82–84Financial Implications
Loading…
Page 82–84Legal Implications
Loading…
Page 82–84Options
Loading…
Page 82–84Respectfully Submitted
Loading…
Page 82–84Summary
Council expressed interest in further exploring the viability of commuter rail service on the E&N corridor between Langford and Victoria as an inter-municipal or regional transit commission model.
Motions (1)
That Council express its interest in further exploring the viability of commuter train service on the E&N corridor between Langford and Victoria as an inter-municipal service, or under Victoria Regional Transit Commission as a local commuter train commission in partnership with provincial, federal, local and First Nation governments for operational and capital expenditures.
Summary
The Chair adjourned the meeting at 10:20 am.
Motions (1)
Adjourn the meeting.