This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.

MattersEnvironmentFirst seen Feb 7, 2022Last discussed Jun 5, 2023

Dust control procedure

The city considered updating dust-control measures and whether to use a procedure rather than a bylaw. The record does not detail the measures or their effects on residents.

Where it stands: Committee resolution was to be amended in favour of a procedure Feb 7, 2022; no final outcome recorded.

Timeline

Every time this matter appeared in council records, newest first.

  1. June 5, 2023·Public comment
    • Wendy Hobbs (Luxon Road)Concerned · Dust bylaw and Luxton Road sidewalks
      Urges a separate, enforceable dust bylaw and prioritizing dangerous Luxton Road sidewalks as traffic from nearby development increases.
    • S. Rossender (Ravensview Drive)Asks · Open meeting video recordings
      Asks why complete recordings of open council meetings are not made public so residents can verify meeting minutes and proceedings.
    • Michael Sunshine (Lang Vista Drive)Mixed · Dust control bylaw
      Supports a construction-impact strategy but urges a separate, near-term dust bylaw covering existing projects and businesses.
    • Lisa Foxhall (Players Drive)Mixed · Sidewalk infills, sister cities, and RCMP priorities
      Asks whether future developers can contribute to sidewalks already installed, supports the sister-city partnership, and thanks West Shore RCMP.
    • A residentSupports · Dust control bylaw
      Urges immediate enactment of the draft dust bylaw, stronger enforcement, and possible stop-work orders for repeat offenders.
  2. August 15, 2022·Notice of motion

    Notice of motion from Councillor Szpak regarding a Dust Regulation Bylaw.

  3. February 7, 2022· Council

    Dust-control update favours a procedure over a bylaw

    Consideration of an update to dust-control measures; the recommendation was to amend the committee resolution (favoring procedure over a bylaw).

  4. February 7, 2022·Public comment
    • L. PlompMixed · Dust control, code of conduct, borrowing
      Urges dust-control consultation, supports a council code of conduct, and questions 25-year borrowing without clear repayment timelines.
    • S. GearyConcerned · Bear Mountain amendment, dust control
      Asks whether the Bear Mountain lot-line amendment could affect forested land and urges effective dust controls against silica exposure.
    • A residentSupports · Dust control, attainable home ownership
      Supports the current complaint-based dust response and the proposed attainable home-ownership policy, citing effective staff collaboration and developer interest.
    • A residentMixed · Dust control, code of conduct, borrowing
      Urges enforceable dust controls, supports a council code of conduct, and questions borrowing for private development when other developers pay infrastructure costs.
    • Mary WagnerMixed · Dust control, borrowing, public participation
      Supports a dust-control bylaw, questions borrowing risks and rationale, and asks for clearer code-of-conduct details and later public comment.
    • B. ArmstrongConcerned · Dust control, homelessness services
      Urges enforceable dust controls and a plan for people experiencing homelessness, including appropriate local services.
    • A residentConcerned · Dust control, code of conduct
      Asks what measures protect residents from silica dust and urges a council code of conduct covering interactions with the public.
    • A residentMixed · Dust control, borrowing, code of conduct
      Urges dust-control accountability, questions the community benefit of developer borrowing, and supports conduct standards for council and public interactions.
    • A residentConcerned · Dust control
      Urges council to assess silica dust’s public-health impacts rather than dismissing concerns, noting existing mining and workplace rules.