MattersDevelopmentBylaw No. 1949First seen Apr 19, 2021Last discussed Aug 16, 2021
2848 and 2852 Millstream Road rezoning
The matter concerns rezoning 2848 and 2852 Millstream Road and closing part of Millstream Road so it can be consolidated with the properties for future development. The record does not describe the proposed development itself.
Where it stands: Rezoning bylaw listed for adoption Aug 16, 2021; the record gives no adoption decision and describes different properties.

Governing bylawNo. 300In force
Zoning BylawThe bylaw sets the rules for how land and water areas in Langford may be used or subdivided, where buildings and structures may be placed, and how parking, loading, screening and landscaping are handled. It is organised into parts covering definitions, general compliance and regulations, parking and bicycle rules, how zones are established, and rules for individual zones; schedules include the zoning map and additional area-specific regulations.
Location
3 mapped locations across 1 matter
Browse mapped locations without the map
- Bylaw NO. 1949 "Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 611, (2848 and 2852 Millstream Rd), Bylaw No. 1949, 2021."
- Bylaw NO. 1949 "Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 611, (2848 and 2852 Millstream Rd), Bylaw No. 1949, 2021."
- Bylaw NO. 1949 "Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 611, (2848 and 2852 Millstream Rd), Bylaw No. 1949, 2021."
Timeline
Every time this matter appeared in council records, newest first.
Public hearing held on the Millstream Road rezoning
Public Hearing for Bylaw No. 1949 regarding rezoning at 2848 & 2852 Millstream Rd.
Who spoke
- A residentOpposes · Gade Road buffer
Opposes reducing the buffer to five meters and asks council to delay or reject the change, citing resident safety, privacy, and limited notice. - A resident (Gade Road)Mixed · Gade Road buffer
Supports the development but says the existing buffer influenced the property purchase and raises concern about losing separation or adding street access. - A resident (Echo Valley Drive)Mixed · Gade Road development
Questions whether a boarding school suits the neighborhood, asks that the original buffer remain, and requests dedicated public park space. - A resident (Gade Road)Opposes · Gade Road buffer and park
Supports keeping the original buffer and asks for accessible neighborhood recreation space separate from school facilities. - A resident (Echo Valley Drive)Mixed · Gade Road development
Supports development in principle but raises concerns about added traffic, speeding, unsafe crossings, and limited community access to recreation space. - A resident (Florence Lake Road)Concerned · Gade Road buffer
Questions whether the dormitory and proposed pathway fit beside nearby homes and asks council to review privacy, setbacks, and site dimensions. - A resident (Florence Lake Road)Opposes · Gade Road buffer
Opposes reducing the buffer to five meters, citing changes to the park’s privacy, safety, and character, and asks council to walk the site with residents. - A residentOpposes · Gade Road buffer
Asks council to reject the variance, citing impacts on residents’ privacy and safety, dormitory proximity, and limited time to review the plans. - A residentConcerned · Gade Road buffer and public space
Says five meters is too little and asks the city to reserve the area for public recreation, including a field and picnic space.
- A residentOpposes · Gade Road buffer
