This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.

DocumentsStaff ReportSep 3, 2024Pages 18–23

Staff Report to Community Advisory Committee: Grant in Aid Policy Refresh

Staff propose updates to the City's Grant in Aid policy (POL-0147-FIN) to clarify eligibility, add community associations/community-led organizations, introduce application form and process improvements, and recommend a $10,000 per-application cap.

8.1.1 Grant in Aid Program Policy Refresh

Key facts

  • Current policy POL-0147-FIN adopted in 2015; staff propose Amendment No.1 (2024)
  • Recommendation to add 'community-led organizations' and 'community associations' as eligible applicants
  • Proposed maximum request per application: $10,000
  • City historically allocates $80,000 annually to the Grant in Aid budget
  • Proposed application deadline amendment to align with municipal budgeting (applications due Dec 15th)

Staff Report to Community Advisory Committee: Grant in Aid Policy Refresh

t 250.478.7882
e administration@langford.ca
2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue
Langford, BC V9B 2X8

DATE: Tuesday, August 27, 2024
DEPARTMENT: Legislative Services
SUBJECT: Grant in Aid Policy Refresh

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The City of Langford has a Grant in Aid program to provide funding to organizations working within the community that deliver a variety of support services. Applications are submitted annually and reviewed by the Community Advisory Committee. Recommendations of the Committee are then forwarded to Council for consideration.

The purpose of the policy is to provide guidelines for the distribution of the allocated Grant in Aid budget, and outline what organizations, groups, and initiatives are qualified to make an application.

BACKGROUND

The Grant in Aid process is governed by POL-0147-FIN titled “Funding Request Policy”. This policy serves to communicate eligibility, application, and assessment processes to applicants.

Prior to the creation of the Community Advisory Committee, these applications were considered by the Administration and Finance Committee.

At the March 4, 2024, Council meeting, the following resolution was passed:

THAT Council direct staff to research other local governments to explore best practices in potentially creating and including Community Association and Community-led Neighbourhood Improvement Grants as part of the 2025 process for our current Grant in Aid Policy Funding.

Staff then reviewed policies and practices from other jurisdictions and compiled ideas that will further build-out the process; providing clear direction for applicants while allowing for Community Associations and Community-led Neighbourhood Improvement projects.

COMMENTARY

CURRENT POLICY

POL-0147-FIN was adopted by Council in 2015 and has not been amended since. The City receives a significant number of applications every year and has awarded funding through the process detailed within.

Over the years, staff have noted the following feedback shared about the policy from applicants including:

  • Difficulty understanding the policy;
  • The policy provides minimal information or direction for applicants;
  • Eligibility requirements are not clear to applicants; and
  • Applicants often require assistance compiling an application.

Upon reviewing other jurisdictions policies and forms, staff have numerous recommendations to build out the policy and address the concerns above.

RESEARCH

Staff compiled copies of other local government’s Grant in Aid policies. Ultimately, staff were looking for an improved process that broadened the inclusivity of the program, in response to the noted Council resolution, and provided potential applicants with clear guidance; including but not limited to parameters to help them provide fulsome and comprehensive applications.

Research identified that some municipalities create an entirely separate program for community organizations/associations to apply under the Grant-in-Aid program. Staff do not believe the creation of a separate program will be beneficial, as it may cause confusion for applicants and further complicate the program when the goal is to streamline it. Therefore, it is staff’s recommendation that these organizations/associations be permitted to apply through the Grant-in-Aid program.

POLICY UPDATES

Staff drafted an update to POL-0147-FIN (see attached) for Committee and Council consideration as follows:

  • Added a section titled “definitions” to help provide clarity around some of the more complex terms used within the policy;
  • Further clarification of qualification requirements;
  • A description of aspects that would make an applicant ineligible or would disqualify their application;
  • Addition of “community-led organizations” and “community associations” to the eligible applicants;
  • An effort to incorporate plain language throughout the policy was made where possible (understanding that the use of some legislative terminologies are unavoidable); and
  • Amended the application deadline to better align with current municipal budgeting timelines.

WHAT IS A COMMUNITY-LED ORGANIZATION OR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION?

With Council’s direction to expand the program, the following definitions have been added to the policy:

“Community-led Organization” means a group of residents and participating members interested in providing a service, amenity, gathering, or event that benefits the greater community of Langford that have formed as a registered society.”

“Community Association” means a non-government association of participating members from a delineated geographic area that may serve as a social club, community promotional group, a service-related organization, and a youth based or focused group that have formed as a registered society.”

Staff’s understanding of the resolution made by Council is a desire to expand the program and allow for more diverse applications. This may also encourage more groups to form, work together, and bring forward ideas within the community.

The requirement for applicants to have formalized as a registered society provides a layer of assurance that the City is not providing assistance to business pursuant to Section 25 of the Community Charter. Once applications have been received, they are reviewed by staff to make sure they are eligible under the policy and applicable legislation.

The intent is to ensure that applicants are able to demonstrate professionalism, illustrate the community benefit, and provide a well thought out, organized plan within their application.

APPLICATION PROCESS

Based on feedback received from applicants, Langford’s current application process is unclear. The policy review undertaken by staff identified that further build-out of the policy was necessary, but also noted that many other jurisdictions use an application form as a tool to help guide applicants through the process. The draft form staff have constructed for Langford (attached) answers many questions that have been posed by Langford applicants and will make the screening process simpler for staff, as it will be easy to assess applications. A form will allow information to be captured and presented in a consistent manner for all applications, simplifying the review and comparison process for the Community Advisory Committee and Council.

Staff recommend keeping the form separate from the policy in order to allow for minor changes to the form in the future where necessary without the need for the policy to be brought back before Council.

FURTHER PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS

If the amended policy is approved by Council, staff intend to publish it to the website (under policies and forms) and advertise its availability through the City’s communication channels. Those who applied in 2023 for 2024 funding will be notified of the application process change through email, as a courtesy.

It has been past practice for staff to email all previous applicants from the year prior inviting them to apply again. Staff would like to retire this process in favour of making the documents available to everyone all year round on the website; not just to those who have applied previously, or who may know about the process already. In the research conducted, many jurisdictions leave this form and its accompanying policy, and additional information in respect to the process available on their website all year.

Page 18–23

Though applications will be available online year-round, staff are proposing that the deadline for submissions be amended from the current January 15th deadline, to a December 15th deadline annually. Municipal budgeting processes are underway earlier than in previous years and the movement of this deadline will help ensure there is adequate time to consider all applications within the budget timelines. The deadline for Grant in Aid and similar programs throughout the municipalities vary greatly, though many are situated towards the end of the calendar year.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

While there are no financial implications associated with amending the Funding Request Policy or introducing a form, the Committee may wish to note that the expansion of eligible parties in response to Council’s resolution may result in more applications.

Currently, there is no cap on the amount of funding that can be requested through the Grant in Aid process. Given the limited funds and number of applications received each year, staff are proposing the introduction of a cap of $10,000 per application. The Grant in Aid program is intended to be a supplementary source of support for applicants, and not the sole source of funding. Further, limiting applications to a maximum request of $10,000 may allow the allocated budget to go further and provide funding to a greater number of organizations and initiatives.

For the last few years, Council has allocated $80,000 annually to the Grant in Aid budget.

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

There are no legal implications associated with expending the Grant-in-Aid program to include community associations and community-led organizations. However, the City must be careful to not be providing financial assistance to businesses pursuant to section 25 of the Community Charter.

Applications will be vetted and reviewed by staff prior to presentation to the Community Advisory Committee and Council.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT

  • 5 – Good Governance
  • 6d – Support the Efforts of Community Organizations to Expand Services to Youth, Seniors, and Other Underrepresented and Marginalized Groups

OPTIONS

Option 1
THAT the Community Advisory Committee recommend that Council approve POL-0147-FIN “Funding Request Policy” Amendment No. 1 as presented.

OR Option 2
THAT the Community Advisory Committee recommend that Council direct staff as follows:
a. _______________;
b. _______________; and
c. _______________.

OR Option 3
THAT the Community Advisory Committee recommend that Council take no action regarding POL-0147-FIN “Funding Request Policy” at this time.

SUBMITTED BY

Nisa Johnston, Legislative Services Administrative Coordinator

Concurrence:
Melisa Miles, Manager of Legislative Services
Donna Petrie, Senior Manager of Communications & Economic Development
Yari Nielsen, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities
Matthew Baldwin, RPP, MCIP, Director of Development Services
Katelyn Balzer, P.Eng., Director of Engineering and Public Works
Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance
Marie Watmough, Director of Legislative & Protective Services
Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer

ATTACHMENTS

  • Attachment 1 – POL-0147-FIN “Funding Request Policy” Amendment No. 1
  • Attachment 2 – Grant in Aid Application Form
Page 18–23
Extracted from: Agenda(90 pages total)