This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.

DocumentsAppendixApr 17, 2023Pages 35–61

Arborist Attachments (Tree Inventory spreadsheet, site survey, preliminary grading plans) - scanned

Original PDF

Scanned supporting materials for the arborist report including detailed tree inventory spreadsheet, site survey and preliminary grading plans.

Key facts

  • Contains the detailed tree inventory and critical root zone calculations
  • Preliminary grading and site survey included as supporting visuals
  • Pages scanned / image-dominant (OCR quality low)

898 and 914 Klahanie Drive - Tree Resource Spreadsheet (Preliminary Only)

Inventory date(s)

  • August 8, 9, and 11, 2022
  • January 16/17, 2023

Prepared by

Tamaki Urban Forestry Consultants Ltd.
Box 48153, RPO Uptown
Victoria, BC V8Z 7H6
Ph: (250) 479-8733 — Fax: (250) 479-7050
Email: timtreeshelp@gmail.com

Cover / title area of the Tree Resource Spreadsheet
Cover / title area of the Tree Resource Spreadsheet
Page 35–61

Table of Contents / Document Overview

Note: The following pages (1–25 of the Tree Resource Spreadsheet) consist primarily of tabular tree inventory data for the subject properties at 898 and 914 Klahanie Drive. The tables include columns such as Tag#, Surveyed? (Yes/No), Location (On, Off, Shared, City), Common Name, Botanical Name, dbh (cm), Crown spread (cm), Critical root zone radius (m), Condition (Health), Structural, Relative tolerance, Retention Suitability (on-site trees), General field observations/remarks, Tree retention/location comments, and Retention status. Where images of the spreadsheet pages appear in the original PDF they are noted below.

Tree Resource Spreadsheet — pages of detailed tree inventory table
Tree Resource Spreadsheet — pages of detailed tree inventory table
Page 35–61

Tree Inventory Tables (Pages 1–25 of the Tree Resource Spreadsheet)

Note: The full inventory is presented as a multi-page spreadsheet table. Each spreadsheet page contains many rows of tree records with the columns listed below. The images show the detailed entries. Below are the table column headings and representative structure. (The full tabular content is presented in the images; each image is noted.)

Table columns (as presented in the spreadsheet)

  • Tag#
  • Surveyed? (Yes/No)
  • Location (On, Off, Shared, City)
  • Name — Common
  • Name — Botanical
  • dbh (cm)
  • Crown spread (cm)
  • Critical root zone radius (m)
  • Condition — Health
  • Condition — Structural
  • Relative tolerance
  • Retention Suitability (on-site trees)
  • General field observations/remarks
  • Tree retention/location comments
  • Retention status
Spreadsheet table — pages 1–25 showing many tree records with the columns above
Spreadsheet table — pages 1–25 showing many tree records with the columns above
Page 35–61

Representative Extracted Entries (first rows as visible on Page 1 of the spreadsheet image)

Note: The original spreadsheet contains many rows. The following rows are transcribed as representative examples from the first visible page of the table. All dollar amounts, dates, addresses, and bylaw numbers that appear in the images are preserved where visible.

Tag# Surveyed? Location Common Name Botanical Name dbh (cm) Crown spread (cm) Critical root zone radius (m) Condition — Health Condition — Structural Relative tolerance Retention Suitability General field observations/remarks Tree retention/location comments Retention status
1751 Yes On-site Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 35 6 5.3 Fair Fair Poor Suitable Lower deadwood, driveway/fill 4m north. Within 1m of LPT. X
1752 Yes On-site Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 88,82 13 15.5 Fair-good Fair Poor Suitable South trunk codominant with included bark, south leader signs of stress. Within driveway footprint. X
1753 Yes On-site Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 30 6 4.5 Fair-poor Fair-poor Poor Conditional Dead top. Within stairway footprint. X
1754 Yes On-site Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 38 7 5.7 Fair Fair Poor Suitable Health stress, narrow asymmetrical crown, bark damage south basal flare. Impacts from LPT, stairway, driveway. X
1755 Yes On-site Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 32,8 6 5.5 Fair-poor Fair-poor Poor Conditional Health decline, surface root damage north side (driveway). Impacts from LPT, stairway, driveway; pre-existing impacts from driveway north side; existing health/structure. X
1756 Yes On-site Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 42,15,1 10 8.6 Fair Fair Poor Suitable Health stress; sparse, asymmetrical crown, driveway installation north side within 1m, bark damage 15cm stem, surface roots. Impacts from LPT/stairway/drivway, pre-existing impacts from driveway, nearby north side impacts; health stress. X
1757 Yes On-site Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata 38 6 5.7 Poor Poor Poor Unsuitable Few live limbs, fill north side (driveway), lower trunk wounds. Impacts from Building A, walkway, driveway; pre-existing wounds; relatively poor health. X
Detailed spreadsheet — page 1 (tree tags 1751–1763) — tabular content visible
Detailed spreadsheet — page 1 (tree tags 1751–1763) — tabular content visible
Page 35–61

Additional Spreadsheet Pages (2–25) — images and descriptions

  • Page 2 of the Tree Resource Spreadsheet (Tag numbers approx. 1764–1776):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 3 (Tag numbers approx. 1777–1789):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 4 (Tag numbers approx. 1790–1802):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 5 (Tag numbers approx. 1803–1815):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 6 (Tag numbers approx. 1816–1828):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 7 (Tag numbers approx. 1829–1841):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 8 (Tag numbers approx. 1842–1854):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 9 (Tag numbers approx. 1855–1867):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 10 (Tag numbers approx. 1868–1880):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 11 (Tag numbers approx. 1881–1893):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 12 (Tag numbers approx. 1894–1906):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 13 (Tag numbers approx. 1907–1918):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 14 (Tag numbers approx. 2173–2185):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 15 (Tag numbers approx. 2186–2197):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 16 (Tag numbers approx. 2468–2480):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 17 (Tag numbers approx. 2481–2493):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 18 (Tag numbers approx. 2494–2506):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 19 (Tag numbers approx. 2507–3931):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 20 (Tag numbers approx. 3932–3944):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 21 (duplicate/repeat of some rows 3932–3944):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 22 (Tag numbers approx. 3958–3970):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 23 (Tag numbers approx. 3971–3983):
    spreadsheet page
    spreadsheet page
  • Page 24 (Tag numbers approx. 3984–3996):
  • Page 25 (Tag numbers approx. 3997–4000):

Each image contains the detailed row-level observations and retention recommendations for each tree. The "Retention status" column includes codes such as "X", "Retain", "Retain*", "TBD", "Unstable", and other notations found in the spreadsheet. Many rows include notes about blasting exposure, new exposure, building footprints, driveways, and specific root/crown/structural issues.

Page 35–61

Site Plan and Tree/Grading Overlay

  • The master site plan images show the proposed townhouse layout, driveways, cul-de-sac, pathways, planting areas, and the tree retention/grading overlay.
  • The plan sheets show the relationship between proposed building footprints and existing tree locations; many tree records in the spreadsheet reference these building footprints (e.g., "Within Building A footprint", "Impacts from Building F", "Within Building G footprint", etc.).
Page 35–61

Notes / Observations (as presented in the spreadsheet images)

  • Many trees are described as having various degrees of health stress, epicormic growth, deadwood, root exposure (rooted next to rock or in fill), and historical topping or trunk defects.
  • Several trees are noted as impacted or likely impacted by blasting, new exposure, excavation, driveways, stairways, or proposed building footprints.
  • Several rows indicate "Advanced assessment recommended if retention is desired" for specific trees.
  • Retention suitability classifications include: Suitable, Conditional, Unsuitable.
  • Retention statuses include: X (likely for removal), Retain, Retain*, TBD, Unstable, and other notes.
Page 35–61

Contact / Prepared By (repeated)

Tamaki Urban Forestry Consultants Ltd.
Box 48153, RPO Uptown
Victoria, BC V8Z 7H6
Ph: (250) 479-8733 — Fax: (250) 479-7050
Email: timtreeshelp@gmail.com

End of extracted content for pages 1–27 (Tree Resource Spreadsheet pages 1–25 and site plan images).

Page 35–61
Extracted from: Agenda(170 pages total)