DocumentsCorrespondenceMay 4, 2020Page 1
FW: Kramer lands
Forwarded email (May 1, 2020) from Robert Dykstra to Suzette Chapman containing public comments urging protection of the Kramer lands. The author asks council to preserve more than 4 ha in natural state, cites biodiversity and climate benefits, and references the McCallum/Spencer rezoning.
Key facts
- Date: Friday, May 1, 2020 (10:02:28 AM)
- Sender: Robert Dykstra
- Recipient: Suzette Chapman
- Subject: FW: Kramer lands
- Request to preserve more than 4 ha of the Kramer lands in natural state
FW: Kramer lands
From:
Robert Dykstra
To:
Suzette Chapman
Subject:
FW: Kramer lands
Date:
Friday, May 1, 2020 10:02:28 AM
Hi Suzette,
Below are some more comments regarding the McCallum / Spencer rezoning.
Thanks,
-Rob
From:
Sent: May 1, 2020 9:33 AM
To: lzpak lzpak@langford.ca; Robert Dykstra rdykstra@langford.ca
Subject: Kramer lands
Regarding the development of the Kramer lands, we urge council to ensure that more than 4ha are preserved in their natural state. We feel strongly that Langford needs more nature, not less, and these lands are incredibly rich in biodiversity. There is a plethora of research linking nature to stress reduction: nature heals.
Mill Hill, Mt Wells, and Goldstream are not enough to serve this burgeoning population.
Are you aware of climate change, and the moderating effect trees have?
Can you consider the value of the innumerable species being impacted?
Where is Langford council's long term vision regarding nature?
Langford's motto, "golden in setting, determined in spirit", seems to mean "our
neighbouring municipalities can conserve their natural beauty, we're determined to
eradicate ours". Residents of Langford deserve better: Please take better care of the
rare and beautiful ecosystems located here.
Sincerely,
"Sustainable communities do not mortgage their resources for only present benefit or exploitation..." Ann Dale, Edging Forward: Achieving Sustainable Community Development