MeetingsMon, Mar 30, 20263h 14m2022–2026 Council
Special Council
Summary
- Directed staff to amend Election Bylaw to allow mail ballots; increased election budget by $15,000 (Bylaw 1819).
- Received the RCMP staffing request and community safety survey update for information (RCMP report).
- Approved consent to the CRD adopting Bylaw 4719 to dissolve the Traffic Safety Commission (Bylaw 4719).
- Rejected directing staff to write a letter joining the Judicial Review Coalition; Wagner and Mayor Goodmanson supported.
Decisions
What council voted on, in agenda order.
Received the RCMP staffing and community safety survey report for information.
7.1 · RCMP Staffing Request and Community Safety Survey Update
Vote 7–0Moved by Harder, seconded by WagnerDirected staff to notify of a 3-year pet grooming TUP at 2899 Sooke Lake Rd.
7.2 · TUP26-0001 - 2899 Sooke Lake Rd
Vote 7–0Moved by Wagner, seconded by Guiry
Agenda
18 items · select one for details, debate and documents
Summary
Mayor Goodmanson called the meeting to order.
Motions (1)
(Procedural) No motion required — call to order announced by the Mayor.
Summary
Councillor Morley read the City's territorial acknowledgement.
Summary
The meeting conduct rules were read by the Corporate Officer.
Summary
Council approved the agenda as presented.
Debate
Brief procedural motion to adopt the published agenda; no substantive debate recorded.
Motions (1)
THAT Council approve the agenda as presented.
Summary
Presentations section (includes a Community Safety Survey Update by James Ridge).
Debate
James Ridge presented the Community Safety Survey results (methodology, demographics, perceptions of safety, and recommended follow-up). Key themes: perceived night-time safety issues (parks/trails), drug use and encampments as public concerns, property crime top victimization type, and recommendation to create three working groups (property crime, unhoused/encampments, parks & trail safety). Ridge recommended funding two additional RCMP officers and holding funds for a third pending working group outcomes.
Summary
Data-driven presentation on community safety perceptions and recommended next steps.
Debate
Council questioned the granularity of the data and how perceptions map to actual reported crime; members discussed the role of working groups and timing relative to the RCMP staffing decision. Several councillors asked about timelines and scope for working groups; James Ridge estimated 4–5 months to complete work.
Summary
Members of the public spoke to items on the agenda (notably 7.1 RCMP resourcing and 7.2 TUP for 2899 Sooke Lake Rd).
Location
2899 Sooke Lake Rd
Debate
Public comments largely supported additional RCMP resources and supported the Temporary Use Permit application for pet grooming at 2899 Sooke Lake Rd; some participants urged better accounting for non-reportable calls (mental health, domestic issues).
Summary
Reports block covering RCMP staffing, a Temporary Use Permit at 2899 Sooke Lake Rd, CRD Traffic Safety Commission consent, and Mail Ballot options.
Location
2899 Sooke Lake Rd
Summary
Council received the RCMP staffing request and the Community Safety Survey update for information.
Debate
Debate focused on reconciling the consultant's staged recommendation (fund two now, hold funding for a third) with the Superintendent's ask (four officers). Discussion covered the seven‑year trend of 6.4% annual increase in criminal offences, body-worn camera impacts on officer time, timelines for recruitment (approx. one year to hire/train), and the role of working groups to prioritize resourcing. Several councillors asked operational questions about shifting patrols to nighttime and partnering with bylaw/security.
Motions (1)
THAT Council receive the March 30, 2026, report titled "RCMP Staffing Request and Community Safety Survey Update" from the Director of Legislative and Protective Services for information.
Documents (2)
City staff report presenting Superintendent Terry Gillespie's business case requesting four additional West Shore RCMP officers for 2026 and summarizing the community safety survey work and implications for the 2026 budget.
Staff Report to Special Council
Loading…
Page 3–5EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Loading…
Page 3–5BACKGROUND:
Loading…
Page 3–5COMMENTARY:
Loading…
Page 3–5FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Loading…
Page 3–5LEGAL IMPLICATIONS:
Loading…
Page 3–5STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Loading…
Page 3–5OPTIONS:
Loading…
Page 3–5SUBMITTED BY:
Loading…
Page 3–5RCMP business case from the West Shore Officer in Charge requesting an increase of four Regular Member positions to address population and case-load growth and to improve frontline capacity and visibility.
Langford - RCMP Resource Request 2026
Loading…
Page 6–11Langford 2026 Resource Plan
Loading…
Page 6–11Key Highlights
Loading…
Page 6–11Resource Requirements
Loading…
Page 6–11Financial Impact
Loading…
Page 6–11Risks of Maintaining Current Staffing Levels
Loading…
Page 6–11Conclusion
Loading…
Page 6–11Summary
Council directed staff to provide notice that it will consider issuing a 3-year Temporary Use Permit to allow pet grooming at 2899 Sooke Lake Rd, subject to a business licence and 3‑year permit term.
Location
2899 Sooke Lake Rd
Debate
Council was supportive of the business and noted a parallel zoning review; staff indicated the zoning bylaw review should be underway and may report back within months. Multiple public speakers and neighbouring-business owners provided strong support and letters of support (approx. 400 submissions noted by a delegate). Council emphasized support for small businesses and expedited consideration in the meantime via a TUP.
Motions (1)
THAT Council: 1) Direct staff to provide notice that Council will consider issuing a Temporary Use Permit to allow for 'pet grooming' services to be permitted at 2899 Sooke Lake Road, subject to the following terms and conditions: a) That the Temporary Use Permit is issued for a period of three years from the time of issuance; b) That the operator of the temporary use obtains a Business Licence from the City of Langford.
Documents (3)
Planning department report on an application by Pawsitive Pet Emporium for a Temporary Use Permit to permit pet grooming at 2899 Sooke Lake Road (C3 zoning), including background, site data and recommended notice to consider issuance for three years.
Staff Report to Special Council
Loading…
Page 12–18BACKGROUND:
Loading…
Page 12–18COMMENTARY:
Loading…
Page 12–18COUNCIL POLICY
Loading…
Page 12–18FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Loading…
Page 12–18LEGAL IMPLICATIONS:
Loading…
Page 12–18OPTIONS:
Loading…
Page 12–18Concurrence:
Loading…
Page 12–18Map showing the subject property boundaries and immediate surrounding parcels for the TUP26-0001 application at 2899 Sooke Lake Road.
Appendix A – Site Map
Loading…
Page 19Location map showing the broader neighbourhood context for 2899 Sooke Lake Road used as Appendix B to the TUP application.
Appendix B – Location Map
Loading…
Page 20Summary
Council consented to the CRD adopting Bylaw No. 4719 to dissolve/replace the Traffic Safety Commission and transfer assets/obligations to the regional transportation service.
Debate
Council briefly discussed the governance change; staff confirmed scholarship/legacy functions will be transitioned (CRD board or delegated committee will administer Sarah Beckett Memorial Scholarship funds). Some members recognized community disappointment at losing a local Traffic Safety Commission but supported regional governance alignment.
Motions (1)
THAT Council consent to the Capital Regional District Board adopting Bylaw No. 4719, 'Traffic Safety Commission Establishment Bylaw No. 1, 1990, Amendment Bylaw No. 5, 2025'.
Documents (4)
Administration report seeking Council consent for the CRD's proposed repeal of the Traffic Safety Commission service by Bylaw No. 4719 and explaining the transfer of TSC functions and assets to the new Regional Transportation Service (RTS).
Staff Report to Special Council
Loading…
Page 21–23EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Loading…
Page 21–23BACKGROUND
Loading…
Page 21–23COMMENTARY
Loading…
Page 21–23FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Loading…
Page 21–23LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
Loading…
Page 21–23STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Loading…
Page 21–23OPTIONS
Loading…
Page 21–23SUBMITTED BY
Loading…
Page 21–23Attachments
Loading…
Page 21–23Contact
Loading…
Page 21–23Letter from CRD Corporate Services requesting City of Langford council consider and respond by May 1, 2026 regarding municipal consent for Bylaw No. 4719 to repeal the Traffic Safety Commission service establishment bylaw.
MUNICIPAL CONSENT FOR BYLAW NO. 4719 - TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION ESTABLISHMENT BYLAW NO. 1, 1990, AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 5, 2025
Loading…
Page 24–25CRD staff report recommending dissolution of the Traffic Safety Commission (TSC), transfer of TSC assets and funds (including scholarship monies) to the Regional Transportation Service, and approval steps for Bylaw Nos. 4711 and 4719.
REPORT TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Loading…
Page 26–29ALTERNATIVES
Loading…
Page 26–29IMPLICATIONS
Loading…
Page 26–29CONCLUSION
Loading…
Page 26–29RECOMMENDATION
Loading…
Page 26–29Submitted by and Concurrences
Loading…
Page 26–29ATTACHMENTS
Loading…
Page 26–29CRD bylaw (No. 4719) to repeal the establishment bylaw for the Traffic Safety Commission Extended Service (Bylaw No. 1828), requiring participating area consent and Inspector of Municipalities approval.
CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT
Loading…
Page 31–32Summary
Council received information on implementing mail ballots and directed staff to amend Election Bylaw No. 1819 to include mail ballots, adding $15,000 to the 2026 election budget.
Financial impact
$15,000
Debate
Council discussed implementation complexity, staff workload, and accessibility benefits. Some members were concerned about the short implementation window and cost per ballot; others emphasized expanding democratic access and reducing barriers. Staff will bring bylaw amendments and operational options for council consideration.
Motions (2)
THAT Council direct staff to amend Election Bylaw No. 1819 to include mail ballots as an option for voting in the election and direct that the election budget be increased by $15,000 as part of the consideration of the 2026-2030 Financial Plan.
THAT Council receive the March 30, 2026 report titled 'Mail Ballot Information' from the Director of Legislative and Protective Services for information.
Documents (2)
Administration report summarizing legislation, processes, timelines, staffing implications and cost estimates for adding mail ballot voting as an option in local elections (recommendation options include receiving the report or amending the Election Bylaw and increasing the election budget).
Introduction
Loading…
Page 33–42Staff Report to Special Council
Loading…
Page 33–42Mail Ballots Within the CRD:
Loading…
Page 33–42Staff Process for Mail Ballots:
Loading…
Page 33–42Mail Ballot Timelines:
Loading…
Page 33–42Mail Ballot Application Process:
Loading…
Page 33–42Rate of Return for Mail Ballots:
Loading…
Page 33–42FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Loading…
Page 33–42LEGAL IMPLICATIONS:
Loading…
Page 33–42STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Loading…
Page 33–42OPTIONS:
Loading…
Page 33–42Timeline calendar illustrating key dates for printing, delivery, issuance and receipt deadlines of mail ballot packages for the 2026 election (includes advanced polling and general voting day context).
SEPTEMBER 2026
Loading…
Page 43OCTOBER 2026
Loading…
Page 43Summary
Correspondence received from Town of View Royal re: Judicial Review Coalition and provincial housing legislation; Council received the update for information and separately considered a motion to join the Coalition (that motion was defeated per minutes).
Debate
Council discussed whether to join the Judicial Review Coalition regarding provincial housing legislation. Staff noted the City had already written to the province on Bill M216 and housing targets; the formal request to join the coalition was debated and ultimately defeated per the official minutes; Council also received the update for information.
Motions (2)
THAT Council receive the Judicial Review Coalition Update correspondence dated March 18, 2026 for information.
THAT Council direct staff to write a letter indicating the City's intent to join the Judicial Review Coalition.
Documents (1)
Letter from the Town of View Royal inviting municipalities to join a coalition to commission a shared legal opinion and potentially pursue a coordinated judicial review regarding recent provincial housing legislation impacting municipal authority.
LETTER TO ALL BC MUNICIPAL COUNCILS
Loading…
Page 44–45Summary
Notices of motion were presented regarding: (9.1) including an expression of preference for CRD Director on the 2026 election ballot (report requested), and (9.2) provincial permanent daylight-saving time impacts and safe routes to school advocacy.
Summary
Council directed staff to prepare a report on what process would be needed to include an expression of preference for CRD Director on the 2026 election ballot.
Debate
Proponents argued the CRD director role is significant and public input via the ballot increases transparency; staff confirmed any procedural changes can be prepared in time for the 2026 election.
Motions (1)
WHEREAS the position of CRD Director is one of significant regional governance and impact; AND WHEREAS having a process for the public to provide input aligns with Priority Five of the Strategic Plan: Good Governance, increasing transparency and promoting democratic values; AND WHEREAS allowing public input on a preference for this position is standard practice in other municipalities with more than one CRD Director position; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Council direct staff to prepare a report on what the process would be to include an expression of preference for CRD Director as part of the 2026 election.
Documents (1)
Notice of Motion directing staff to prepare a report on options to include an expression of preference for CRD Director as part of the 2026 election, aligning appointment processes with other municipalities that have multiple CRD director positions.
Introduction
Loading…
Page 46–48NOTICE OF MOTION
Loading…
Page 46–48Background
Loading…
Page 46–48References:
Loading…
Page 46–48Summary
Council directed staff to prepare a letter to provincial ministers and the Premier outlining concerns about year-round daylight-saving time impacts on children walking to school and to advocate reopening Active Transportation grants and supporting visibility initiatives for students.
Debate
Council discussed safety for children commuting in darkness if permanent daylight-saving time were adopted and highlighted infrastructure, equity (visibility gear), and program supports such as the Walking School Bus. Motion carried with Councillor Morley opposed.
Motions (1)
THAT Council direct staff to prepare a letter to the Minister of Education and Child Care, the Minister of Transportation and Transit, and the Premier's Office, with a copy to all local governments in British Columbia, outlining Council's concerns regarding the impacts of adopting year-round Pacific Daylight Time on children who would be required to walk to school in the dark; AND THAT the letter advocate for: (1) immediate reopening of the Active Transportation Infrastructure Grant Program; (2) the establishment of a program ensuring all students have access to visibility-enhancing resources; and (3) the expansion of the Walking School Bus program.
Documents (1)
Notice of Motion requesting staff prepare a letter to provincial ministers and the Premier outlining Council concerns about year-round daylight-saving time causing children to travel to school in darkness and advocating for reopening active transportation grant programs and supports for safe school routes.
Introduction
Loading…
Page 49–51NOTICE OF MOTION
Loading…
Page 49–51Introduction:
Loading…
Page 49–51Background:
Loading…
Page 49–51Rationale:
Loading…
Page 49–51Strategic Plan Initiatives:
Loading…
Page 49–51References:
Loading…
Page 49–51Summary
Council moved in-camera to consider land acquisition/disposition and litigation matters per Community Charter section 90(1)(e) & (g).
Motions (1)
THAT Council close the meeting at 10:13 pm to the public pursuant to section 90 (1) (e) and (g) of the Community Charter to consider: • the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land or improvements, if the council considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality; • litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality.
Summary
Council adjourned the meeting at 10:38 pm.
Motions (1)
THAT Council adjourn the meeting.