This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.

DocumentsStaff ReportDec 2, 2024Pages 27–46

Staff Report: DVP24-0008 – Application to Reduce Onsite Parking Stalls at 797 Revilo Place

Application by Alan Lowe on behalf of Impera Residential to vary parking requirements at 797 Revilo Place by reducing the number of onsite stalls by eight to protect two trees on an adjacent property, following a parkade redesign.

8.1.3 Development Variance Permit - 797 Revilo Road (DVP24-0008)

Key facts

  • Civic address: 797 Revilo Avenue
  • Applicant: Alan Lowe Architect Inc.; Owner: Impera Residential Limited Partnership
  • Previously approved: 131 residential units with 164 onsite parking stalls; proposed reduction of 8 stalls → 156 stalls (1.19 stalls/unit)
  • Reason: redesign of underground parkade to protect two neighbouring trees (arborist input)
  • Site within 200 m/400 m tiers related to Transit-Oriented Area provisions noted (parking relaxations may apply)

Staff Report to Sustainable Development Advisory Committee

DATE: Tuesday, November 12, 2024
DEPARTMENT: Planning
APPLICATION NO.: DVP24-0008
SUBJECT: Application for a Development Variance Permit to Allow for a Reduced Number of Onsite Parking Stalls at 797 Revilo Place

Executive Summary

Alan Lowe has applied on behalf of Impera Residential Limited Partnership for a Development Variance Permit to reduce the number of onsite parking stalls at 797 Revilo Place by 8 stalls in order to protect two trees on the neighbouring property by reducing the parkade along the shared property line.

Page 27–46

Background

Previous Applications

The subject property was rezoned from ‘One-and Two-Family Residential’ (R2) to ‘City Centre’ (CC1) under rezoning application Z21-0011. Council adopted the rezoning in May of 2022 under Bylaw No. 2017. A subsequent Form and Character Development Permit (DP23-0040) for a 6-storey multi-family residential building with 131 units and 164 onsite parking stalls was issued in August of 2023.

Table 1: Site Data

Item Detail
Applicant Alan Lowe Architect Inc.
Owner Impera Residential Limited Partnership
Civic Address 797 Revilo Avenue
Legal Description Lot 1, Section 73, Esquimalt District, Plan EPP127677
Size of Property 2,850 m² (0.7 acres)
DP Areas City Centre
Zoning Existing: CC1
Proposed: CC1
OCP Designation Existing: City Centre
Proposed: City Centre
Page 27–46

Site and Surrounding Area

The subject property, which was consolidated from three lots, has been cleared of the three dwellings and vegetation that previously existed in order to facilitate the proposed development. South of this site is Lowe’s Home Improvement. To the west, across Phipps Road, is Walmart. To the north and east are single-family dwellings, duplexes, and townhomes.

Subject property figure / site context
Subject property figure / site context

Table 2: Surrounding Land Uses

Direction Zoning Use
North MU1 (Mixed Use Residential Commercial), RM3 (Apartment), R2 (One- and Two-Family Residential) Townhouse Residential; Apartment Residential; Single-Family Residential
East R2 (One- and Two-Family Residential) Single-Family Residential
South C3 (District Commercial) Commercial
West C3 (District Commercial) Commercial
Page 27–46

Commentary

Following the adoption of the rezoning and issuance of the Development Permit, the applicant sought approval from the neighbouring property owner to remove two of their trees as the location of the underground parkade would negatively impact these two trees. However, the applicant did not obtain approval to remove those trees, so the architect for this project redesigned the parkade in order to save them. This redesign resulted in the loss of 8 parking stalls, which is the purpose of the variance request.

It should be noted that the property is located within the 200-meter radius of the Transit-Oriented Area, for which the applicant could rezone to allow for a 10-storey building with no parking, in accordance with the new Provincial legislation. However, the applicant wishes to proceed with a 6-storey building and, if the variance were supported, have 156 onsite parking stalls for 131 units.

To support the requested variance, the applicant submitted a Parking Memo from WATT Consulting Group. The study found that visitor parking in similar developments were within the range that the current application is requesting, that being 0.1 space per unit for visitor parking stalls, and that they supported the variance request.

The previous rezoning required the registration of a restrictive covenant on title prior to issuance of a building permit that ensures parking is allocated to each unit and for visitors as required by the zoning bylaw and not provided in exchange for compensation separate from that of a residential unit. The allocation for visitor stalls would be amended to suit this variance request, if it is supported.

Page 27–46

Financial Implications

There are no financial implications assigned with this report.

Page 27–46

Legal Implications

This application and report considers a parking variance to reduce the number of parking spaces on site at 797 Revilo Place. The formerly approved rezoning application and development permit mentioned within the report are to provide context only.

Page 27–46

Options

Option 1

THAT the Sustainable Development Advisory Committee recommend that Council:

  1. Direct staff to provide notice that Council will consider issuing a Development Variance Permit for the property at 797 Revilo Place with the following variance:

a. That Table 1 of Section 4.01.01 be varied by reducing the minimum number of parking spaces required for an apartment in the City Centre from the required 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit to 1.19 spaces per dwelling unit, of which 0.19 shall be designated for visitor parking.

OR Option 2

THAT the Sustainable Development Advisory Committee recommend that Council take no action with respect to this application for a Development Variance Permit at 797 Revilo Place until such time as the following items are addressed and reviewed by the Sustainable Development Advisory Committee:

a. ________________;
b. ________________; AND
c. ________________.

Page 27–46

Submitted By

SUBMITTED BY: Robert Dykstra, RPP, MCIP, Senior Planner

Concurrence:
Matthew Baldwin, RPP, MCIP, Director of Development Services

Concurrence:
Leah Stohmann, RPP, MCIP, Director of Community Planning and Climate Change

Concurrence:
Melisa Miles, Manager of Legislative Services

Concurrence:
Donna Petrie, Senior Manager of Communications & Economic Development

Concurrence:
Katelyn Balzer, P.Eng., Director of Engineering and Public Works

Concurrence:
Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance

Concurrence:
Marie Watmough, Director of Legislative & Protective Services

Concurrence: Braden Hutchins, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer

Concurrence:
Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer

Page 27–46

Appendices

Appendix A – Site Map

Appendix A – Site Map (site plan)
Appendix A – Site Map (site plan)
Appendix A – Site Map (detailed site plan view)
Appendix A – Site Map (detailed site plan view)

Appendix B – Location Map

Appendix B – Location Map (regional context)
Appendix B – Location Map (regional context)
Appendix B – Location Map (local context)
Appendix B – Location Map (local context)
Page 27–46

Project Visuals and Supporting Diagrams

Project title / overview slide — DVP application – Impera – Revilo and Phipps
Project title / overview slide — DVP application – Impera – Revilo and Phipps
Rendering / plan view — DVP application – Impera – 797 Revilo
Rendering / plan view — DVP application – Impera – 797 Revilo
Diagram — "Underground wall at property line"
Diagram — "Underground wall at property line"
Diagram — "Underground wall moved to protect tree roots" (Reduction of 4 parking stalls)
Diagram — "Underground wall moved to protect tree roots" (Reduction of 4 parking stalls)
Diagram — "Underground wall at property line" (alternate view)
Diagram — "Underground wall at property line" (alternate view)
Diagram — "Underground wall moved to protect tree roots" (Reduction of 4 parking stalls, alternate view)
Diagram — "Underground wall moved to protect tree roots" (Reduction of 4 parking stalls, alternate view)

Parking Calculations / Project Summary

Slide showing parking calculations
Slide showing parking calculations
  • 131 residential units proposed
  • 131 x 1.25 stalls = 164 stalls
  • Request reduction of 8 stalls to protect trees on neighbour’s property
  • 164 minus 8 = 156 stalls
  • 156 stalls / 131 units = 1.19 stalls/unit
Map / slide — "Within 400 metre tier for Transit Oriented Areas" (Transit Oriented Development Areas require no off-street parking minimums)
Map / slide — "Within 400 metre tier for Transit Oriented Areas" (Transit Oriented Development Areas require no off-street parking minimums)
Slide — "Talmack Tree Arborist recommendations" and "Watt Consulting Group Parking Assessment" — Variance request based on:
Slide — "Talmack Tree Arborist recommendations" and "Watt Consulting Group Parking Assessment" — Variance request based on:

Watt Consulting Study

Watt Consulting Study — September 20, 2024 (cover slide)
Watt Consulting Study — September 20, 2024 (cover slide)
Final slide — "Thank you! Questions?"
Final slide — "Thank you! Questions?"
Page 27–46
Extracted from: Agenda(306 pages total)