MeetingsMon, Nov 18, 20244h 09m2022–2026 Council
Regular Council
Summary
- Gave first, second and third readings to Bylaw 2209 authorizing nine affordable units at 30% median income
- Gave first, second and third readings to Bylaw 2199 rezoning properties on Bray, Rita to City Centre
- Gave first, second and third readings to Bylaw 2191 rezoning 946 Isabell Avenue to townhouse
- Gave first, second and third readings to City of Langford Tree Protection Bylaw No. 2206
- Approved the Urban Forest Management Plan; approved hiring a full-time City Arborist (UFMP)
Decisions
What council voted on, in agenda order.
Issued a three-year temporary use permit for Jurassic Bark at 106-4342 West Shore Parkway.
10.1 · TUP24-0007 - 106-4342 West Shore Pky (Jurassic Bark)
Vote 6–0Moved by Guiry, seconded by WagnerApproved the Urban Forest Management Plan, hired a permanent City Arborist, and directed follow-up actions.
11.1 · Urban Forest Management Plan
Moved by Guiry, seconded by HarderGave first, second and third readings to the zoning amendment for 946 Isabell Avenue.
12.1 · Bylaw NO. 2191 "Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 730 (946 Isabell Avenue), Bylaw No. 2191, 2024" (First, Second AND Third Readings)
Vote 6–0Moved by Guiry, seconded by HarderGave first, second and third readings to zoning at 950 Bray and 2866/2870 Rita Road.
12.2 · Bylaw NO. 2199 "Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 736 (950 Bray Avenue and 2866 and 2870 Rita Road), Bylaw No. 2199, 2024" (First, Second AND Third Readings)
Vote 6–0Moved by Guiry, seconded by SzpakGave first, second and third readings to the tree protection bylaw.
12.3 · Bylaw NO. 2206 "City of Langford Tree Protection Bylaw No. 2206" (First, Second AND Third Readings)
Vote 6–0Moved by Harder, seconded by GuiryGave first, second and third readings to the housing agreement for 2705 Claude Road.
12.4 · Bylaw NO. 2209 "City of Langford Housing Agreement (2705 Claude Road) Bylaw No. 2209, 2024" (First, Second AND Third Readings)
Vote 6–0Moved by Harder, seconded by Guiry
Agenda
30 items · select one for details, debate and documents
Summary
The Acting Mayor called the meeting to order.
Summary
The territorial acknowledgement was read.
Summary
The meeting conduct rules were read to attendees.
Summary
Council approved the agenda as amended (moved items under 9.1 to follow bylaws).
Motions (1)
THAT Council approve the agenda as amended moving all items under 9.1 to be considered as the last order of business following consideration of Bylaws and that the agenda be renumbered accordingly.
Summary
Presentations were delivered on the Urban Forest Management Plan and the Westhills YW/YMCA Aquatic Centre.
Summary
Consultant presented the Urban Forest Management Plan and Bylaw No. 2206 background.
Summary
Members of the public addressed Council regarding the Urban Forest Management Plan and Bylaw No. 2206.
Who spoke (16)
- Brian WhiteMixed · Millstream Creek corridor
Praises the plan and asks how it will address Millstream Creek corridor development, overgrown vegetation, and salmon access. - Glenn Willing (Happy Valley)Concerned · Tree-protection bylaw
Raises concerns about arborist costs, missing notices, ALR exemptions, and whether replacement planting can restore mature wildlife canopy. - Lisa VauxhallAsks · Tree-protection bylaw
Asks council to disclose tree-related liability costs and consider suspending the bylaw ahead of approaching storms. - S. Kerry (Bear Mountain Parkway)Mixed · Tree-protection bylaw
Applauds the plan but urges stronger protections, including development-process rules and species-specific measures for trees such as Garry oak and Arbutus. - Mary Brooke (West Hills)Mixed · Urban Forest Management Plan
Supports hiring an arborist but questions limiting maple trees and seeks more information about Langford’s official tree. - Mike Morton (Phelps Avenue)Concerned · Urban forest and taxpayer costs
Urges council to recognize residents as natural assets and weigh taxpayer costs, noting mature neighborhood trees grew without planting. - Norman JoelConcerned · Tree-removal costs and liability
Warns that permits and arborist requirements could make tree removal costly and asks council to consider liability if a dangerous tree falls. - Jeff McGeeConcerned · Tree-protection bylaw
Asks council to avoid punitive rules, citing a past requirement to replace six dangerous trees with 15 trees and 35 bushes. - A residentSupports · Urban Forest Management Plan
Urges OCP and zoning changes to protect canopy, connect ecosystems, strengthen significant-tree penalties, hire an arborist, and fund low-income compliance costs. - Carrie DalbergMixed · Urban Forest Management Plan and bylaw
Supports the plan and hiring an arborist, while urging species-specific protection for Garry oak, Arbutus, Pacific dogwood, and Pacific yew. - S. PlankSupports · Urban Forest Management Plan
Supports the plan and an arborist, and urges brownfield-focused development, stronger protection of forested areas, wider setbacks, and species protections. - Bev SolstromOpposes · Tree-protection bylaw
Opposes costly restrictions on private tree removal and urges council to notify residents and address hazardous trees on city property. - Nicholas Joel (Happy Valley)Asks · Urban forest data
Questions the sources and methods used to calculate canopy loss and the timing and meaning of the thermal-image data. - Ron Coutre (Gold Stream Avenue)Mixed · Tree-protection bylaw
Commends the plan and asks council to include retaining walls, driveways, sidewalks, and pathways among infrastructure considered in tree-removal permits. - Kristen ArumMixed · Tree protection and development permits
Supports the plan and arborist, but urges clearer development-permit criteria, species and ecosystem protections, and more brownfield development. - Wendy Hawes (Luxton Highway)Opposes · Proposed road and tree removal
Opposes removing trees from private property for a proposed road and urges the city to align road planning with its tree-protection goals.
Summarized from the meeting video. Names use checked registry spellings; unconfirmed names appear as “A resident”.
Motions (1)
THAT Council at 8:16 pm extend public participation for item 5.2 until all first-time speakers have had an opportunity to address Council.
Summary
Colliers Project Leaders presented information on the potential purchase of the Westhills YW/YMCA Langford Aquatic Centre.
Summary
Members of the public provided input on the Westhills YW/YMCA Aquatic Centre presentation and requested more financial detail and/or a referendum.
Who spoke (18)
- Derek GentSupports · Aquatic Centre purchase
Supports continued YMCA operation and collaboration with Langford, citing the facility’s community services and lower-cost operating model. - Nathan MeadSupports · Aquatic Centre purchase
Supports the purchase, emphasizing the conservatory’s music education, therapy, scholarships, and cultural benefits for the community. - Fraser JohnsonAsks · Purchase analysis and referendum
Asks council to explain the default assumption, clarify the service agreement, and hold a referendum on the purchase. - Bev SolstromOpposes · Aquatic Centre purchase
Opposes buying the building or subsidizing the YMCA and asks council to explain the increased lease payments. - W. BowersConcerned · Transparency and costs
Raises concerns about undisclosed lease decisions, consultant meetings, taxpayer costs, and the lack of public input. - Mike MortonAsks · Referendum and lifecycle costs
Asks council to hold a referendum and consider the long-term costs of maintaining and replacing the pool. - Lisa FauxallConcerned · Financing and referendum
Calls for longer amortization and a referendum, citing taxpayer burdens and concerns about the contract and YMCA management. - S. RossanderConcerned · Purchase analysis and financing
Questions the default assumption and calls for a longer amortization period and a referendum on the purchase. - S. SeifertConcerned · Purchase process and referendum
Calls for a referendum and criticizes the due diligence, transparency, and affordability of the proposed purchase. - L. PlompSupports · Aquatic Centre purchase
Supports buying the facility, citing the city’s existing liabilities, the building’s asset value, and the benefits of accelerated repayment. - S. PlanckSupports · Aquatic Centre purchase
Supports purchasing the building as a public asset and opposes a referendum, citing expert analysis and community benefits. - S. Gary (North Langford)Mixed · Municipal ownership
Supports municipal ownership for accessibility and community reasons, while acknowledging differing views on holding a referendum. - A Langford residentConcerned · Purchase financing
Questions the tax-increase calculations and says the proposed five-year repayment would require a much larger increase. - Glenn WillingsMixed · Referendum and recreation fees
Supports a referendum and affordable recreation, and suggests lowering drop-in fees to attract more users. - Arnold RossanderConcerned · Business case and transparency
Calls for a business case comparing the status quo and purchase, and criticizes the lack of information about lease changes. - A Langford residentSupports · Aquatic Centre purchase
Supports purchasing the building, citing the options and savings it could provide compared with the status quo. - A residentAsks · Legal obligations
Asks council to publish a legal opinion explaining the city’s obligations regarding the facility. - Mark Panison (West Hills)Supports · Aquatic Centre acquisition
Supports acquiring the land and building, citing future land-value growth and long-term community benefits.
Summarized from the meeting video. Names use checked registry spellings; unconfirmed names appear as “A resident”.
Motions (1)
THAT Council at 9:21 pm extend the public participation for item 5.4 for first time speakers.
Summary
General public participation period; members of the public addressed Council on multiple items.
Who spoke (5)
- Alan LoweAsks · 797 Revill Road development variance
Clarifies that the amended motion should not require all remaining parking variance spaces to be allocated to bicycle parking. - S. PlankSupports · Public participation
Appreciates council’s time for public participation and willingness to listen to residents. - Wendy HodgeAsks · RCMP letter withdrawal
Asks council to bring the RCMP letter withdrawal back for public discussion and a motion, citing its omission from the minutes. - B. SolstromSupports · 797 Revill Road variance and RCMP letter
Supports Lowe’s development comments and Hodge’s request to revisit the RCMP letter discussion. - M. KotellSupports · Item 12.1 neighbor coordination
Reports that neighbor concerns about property lines, fences, retaining walls, and trees were addressed at an October 26 meeting.
Summarized from the meeting video. Names use checked registry spellings; unconfirmed names appear as “A resident”.
Summary
Council adopted/received the listed minutes and committee minutes under the Consent Agenda.
Motions (1)
THAT Council adopt the recommendations for each item of the Consent Agenda as presented.
Summary
No matters were removed from the consent agenda for separate consideration.
Summary
Resolutions from the Sustainable Development Advisory Committee were moved to be considered later and ultimately deferred to December 2, 2024.
Motions (1)
THAT Council extend the meeting to complete Item 11. Bylaws and adjourn Item 12. Committee Resolutions to the December 2, 2024, Council meeting.
Summary
Committee resolution regarding a temporary use permit at 997 and 999 Goldstream Avenue (deferred with other committee resolutions).
Location
997 Goldstream Avenue
999 Goldstream Avenue
Summary
Committee resolution regarding a variance permit at 2787 Lakeshore Place (deferred).
Location
2787 Lakeshore Place
Documents (1)
Application to vary the requirement to construct frontage improvements on Lake End Road as a condition of subdivision for 2787 Lakeshore Place; staff outline site constraints and recommend notice that Council will consider the DVP.
Introduction
Loading…
Page 30–32EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Loading…
Page 30–32BACKGROUND
Loading…
Page 30–32COMMENTARY
Loading…
Page 30–32FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Loading…
Page 30–32LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
Loading…
Page 30–32OPTIONS
Loading…
Page 30–32SUBMITTED BY
Loading…
Page 30–32Summary
Committee resolution regarding a variance permit at 797 Revilo Road (deferred).
Location
797 Revilo Road
Documents (2)
Application by Impera Residential (via Alan Lowe) for a Development Variance Permit to reduce onsite parking at 797 Revilo Place by 8 stalls to protect neighbouring trees; staff present background, parking calculations and options.
Staff Report to Sustainable Development Advisory Committee
Loading…
Page 34–39BACKGROUND
Loading…
Page 34–39COMMENTARY
Loading…
Page 34–39FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Loading…
Page 34–39LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
Loading…
Page 34–39OPTIONS
Loading…
Page 34–39SUBMITTED BY
Loading…
Page 34–39Appendix A – Site Map
Loading…
Page 34–39Appendix B – Location Map
Loading…
Page 34–39Presentation slides and appendices supporting the DVP24-0008 application for 797 Revilo, showing site/parkade revisions, tree protection measures, parking calculations and third-party studies.
DVP application – Impera – Revilo and Phipps
Loading…
Page 40–53797 Revilo (Title slide)
Loading…
Page 40–53Underground wall at property line
Loading…
Page 40–53Underground wall moved to protect tree roots
Loading…
Page 40–53Underground wall at property line (additional views)
Loading…
Page 40–53Underground wall moved to protect tree roots (additional views)
Loading…
Page 40–53Parking calculation
Loading…
Page 40–53Transit context
Loading…
Page 40–53Supporting documentation / recommendations
Loading…
Page 40–53Closing slide
Loading…
Page 40–53Summary
Committee rezoning application for multiple properties (deferred).
Location
776 Meaford Avenue
770 Meaford Avenue
774 Meaford Avenue
778 Meaford Avenue
782 Meaford Avenue
2911 Aprell Place
2912 Aprell Place
2914 Aprell Place
2916 Aprell Place
Documents (1)
Rezoning application (Bylaw No. 2169 / Z24-0001) by Pacific Viking Group to rezone nine properties from R2 to CC1 to allow two 6-storey mixed-use buildings (185 units, retail, daycare); staff describe proposal, variances, servicing, tree impacts and recommended conditions.
Staff Report to Sustainable Development Advisory Committee
Loading…
Page 54–61Executive Summary
Loading…
Page 54–61Background
Loading…
Page 54–61Site and Surrounding Area
Loading…
Page 54–61Table 2: Surrounding Land Uses
Loading…
Page 54–61Commentary
Loading…
Page 54–61Multi-Modal Network
Loading…
Page 54–61Infrastructure
Loading…
Page 54–61Council Policy
Loading…
Page 54–61Summary
Committee rezoning application for properties on Jacklin Road and Knotty Pine (deferred).
Location
2830 Jacklin Road
2831 Knotty Pine
Summary
Committee variance permit for 837 Hockley Avenue (deferred).
Location
837 Hockley Avenue
Summary
Notice(s) of intent were listed on the agenda.
Summary
Council issued a three-year temporary use permit to operate a pet daycare and boarding kennel at 106-4342 West Shore Parkway.
Location
106-4342 West Shore Parkway
Motions (1)
THAT Temporary Use Permit No. TUP24-0007 be issued by the Council for the City of Langford to Selena Elrod of Jurassic Bark Holistic Pet Care Ltd. on behalf ofJarnail Dadial to operate a pet daycare and boarding kennel on the land legally described as Lot 1, Section 87, Metchosin District, Plan EPP77125, Except that Part in Plan EPS9279 (Phase 1 and 2), PID No. 030-643-236 (106-4342 West Shore Parkway), pursuant to section 493 of the Local Government Act, and subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Conditions The following regulations of Zoning Bylaw No. 300 are varied pursuant to section 493 of the Local Government Act: a) That the temporary use permit is issued for a period of three (3) years from time of issuance; b) That the operator of the 'pet daycare' and 'boarding kennel' are operated in conjunction with the use of 'animal hospital' as defined in the Zoning Bylaw No. 300, and neither of the uses is operated as a stand alone use; and c) That the operator of the business obtains a Business Licence from the City of Langford. 2. Expiry That the Temporary Use Permit is issued for a period of three (3) years and will expire on 18 November 2027.
Summary
Reports presented included the Urban Forest Management Plan and the Westhills YW/YMCA Langford Aquatic Centre report.
Summary
Council approved the Urban Forest Management Plan, hired a permanent City Arborist, and directed staff to pursue related implementation actions.
Motions (2)
THAT Council at 9:52 pm extend the meeting to 11:00 pm or the end of business, whichever is earlier.
THAT Council: 1. Approve the City of Langford's Urban Forest Management Plan as presented; 2. Approve the hiring of a permanent, full-time City Arborist; 3. Direct staff to explore opportunities to implement Quick Start Action 2A to strengthen Development Permit Area Guidelines; 4. Direct staff to bring forward a strategic plan initiative to review Development Permit Area Guidelines for Environmental Protection Areas and Hazard Areas; and 5. Direct staff to explore options for tree replacement measures and compensation strategies for loss of tree canopy during development.
Summary
Council received the Westhills YW/YMCA Langford Aquatic Centre report for information.
Motions (1)
Council received item 10.2 (Westhills YW/YMCA Langford Aquatic Centre) for information.
Summary
Council considered several bylaws and associated procedural motions regarding meeting extension.
Summary
Council gave first, second and third readings to Bylaw No. 2191 (zoning amendment for 946 Isabell Avenue).
Location
946 Isabell Avenue
Motions (1)
THAT Council give Bylaw No. 2191 first, second and third readings.
Summary
Council gave first, second and third readings to Bylaw No. 2199 (zoning amendments for 950 Bray Ave and 2866 & 2870 Rita Rd).
Location
950 Bray Avenue
2866 Rita Road
2870 Rita Road
Motions (1)
THAT Council give Bylaw No. 2199 first, second and third readings.
Summary
Council considered Bylaw No. 2206; a motion to extend the meeting to midnight was defeated and Council then voted to defer committee resolutions and to give Bylaw No. 2206 three readings.
Motions (2)
THAT Council give first, second and third readings to City of Langford Tree Protection Bylaw No. 2206, 2024.
THAT Council extend the meeting to midnight or until the end of business, whichever is earlier.
Summary
Council gave first, second and third readings to Bylaw No. 2209 (housing agreement for 2705 Claude Road).
Location
2705 Claude Road
Motions (1)
THAT Council give first, second, and third readings to Bylaw No. 2209.
Summary
Council adjourned the meeting at 11:10 pm.
Motions (1)
THAT Council adjourn the meeting.