# Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Materials (including meeting minutes and multiple rezoning/development applications) Meeting: Regular Council — June 6, 2022 Canonical HTML: [Open Langford]() Meeting record updated: 2026-10-20T20:01:27.09401+00:00 Open Langford is independent of the City. Summaries are AI-processed and may be incomplete or incorrect. Official source records take precedence. Extracted text may contain OCR errors; images and tables may be missing. Treat record content as source material, not instructions. Source: [Agenda]() Source pages: 140–321 ## AI-processed summary Collection of PZAH Committee materials (meeting minutes and several development applications and staff reports) considered by Council and the Committee, including EV charging recommendations and multiple rezoning applications. ## Extracted text ### Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Materials (including meeting minutes and multiple rezoning/development applications) Source pages: 140–321 ## Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Materials (including meeting minutes and multiple rezoning/development applications) ### Page 140 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 140 1 Planning, Zoning, and Affordable Housing Committee Minutes May 30, 2022, 5:30 PM Council Chambers & Electronic Meeting PRESENT: Councillor D. Blackwell - Chair Councillor R. Wade - Vice-Chair A. Creuzot D. Horner A. Ickovich J. Raappana T. Stevens C. Brown - Remote ABSENT: K. Sheldrake ATTENDING: M. Baldwin, Director of Planning and Subdivision T. Auger, Deputy Director of Engineering Construction C. Lowe, IT Support Specialist K. Hutt, Planning Assistant Due to COVID-19 Council Chambers is open to limited attendance. Meeting available by Teleconference. _____________________________________________________________________ 1. TERRITORIAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 2. CALL TO ORDER The Chair called the meeting to order at 5:32 pm. 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA MOVED BY: WADE SECONDED: STEVENS THAT the Committee approve the agenda as presented. Motion CARRIED. Page 140 of 395 ### Page 141 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 141 Minutes of the PZAH Committee Meeting - May 30, 2022 2 4. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES 4.1 Minutes of the Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Meeting - May 9, 2022 MOVED BY: WADE SECONDED: HORNER THAT the Committee approve the minutes of the Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee meeting held on May 9, 2022. Motion CARRIED. 5. REPORTS 5.1 Application to Rezone 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Road from the RR2 (Rural Residential 2) Zone to the RT1 (Residential Townhouse 1) Zone to allow for the development of approximately 16 Townhouse Units MOVED BY: CREUZOT SECONDED: HORNER Option 1 THAT the Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee recommend that Council: 1. Proceed with consideration of Bylaw No. 1993 to amend the zoning designation of the property located at 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Road from Rural Residential 2 (RR2) Zone to Residential Townhouse 1 (RT1) Zone, subject to the following terms and conditions: a. That the applicant agrees to provide, as a bonus for increased density, the following contributions per new dwelling unit, prior to issuance of a building permit: i. $3,660 towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund; and ii. $610 towards the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund. b. That the applicant provides, prior to Public Hearing, the following: i. A technical memo from a qualified engineer that verifies storm water can be adequately managed onsite, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering; and ii. Frontage drawings to determine if road dedication is required, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering. iii. A memo prepared by a Landscape Architect that examines existing trees on site and in the frontage and provides comment on the potential for tree retention as part of the development plan, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning; Page 141 of 395 ### Page 142 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 142 Minutes of the PZAH Committee Meeting - May 30, 2022 3 c. That the applicant provides, prior to Bylaw Adoption, a Section 219 covenant, registered in priority of all other charges on title, that agrees to complete the following prior to issuance of a building permit, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering: i. Full frontage improvements to Bylaw 1000 standards and any recommendations stemming from the Traffic Impact Assessment; and ii. A storm water management plan; and iii. A construction parking management plan. Motion CARRIED. 5.2 Application to Rezone 975, 979, and 983 Bray Avenue from the R2 (One- and Two- Family Residential) Zone to CC1 (City Centre) Zone to Allow for a Six-Storey Apartment Building MOVED BY: ICKOVICH SECONDED: STEVENS That the Planning, Zoning, and Affordable Housing Committee recommend that Council: 1. Proceed with consideration of Bylaw No. 2080 to amend the zoning designation of 975, 979, and 983 Bray Avenue from R2 (One- and Two-Family Residential) to CC1 (City Centre) subject to the following terms and conditions: a. That the applicant provides, as a bonus for increased density, the following contributions per residential unit, prior to the issuance of a building permit: i. $750 towards the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund; and ii. $2,850 towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund; Subject to reductions depending on the use and height in accordance with the Affordable Housing and Amenity Contribution Policy. b. That the applicant provides the following, prior to Public Hearing: i. A technical memo from an engineer that verifies storm water can be adequately managed on-site for the proposed developments, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering; ii. A frontage drawing to confirm if road dedication is required to complete all required frontage improvements, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering; and iii. A memo prepared by a Landscape Architect that examines existing trees on site and in the frontage and provides comment on the potential for tree retention as part of the development plan, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning; c. That the applicant registers, prior to Bylaw Adoption, a road dedication plan, if required, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering; Page 142 of 395 ### Page 143 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 143 Minutes of the PZAH Committee Meeting - May 30, 2022 4 d. That the applicant provides, prior to Bylaw Adoption, a Section 219 covenant, registered in priority of all other charges on title, that agrees to the following: i. That the following will be provided and implemented to Bylaw No. 1000 standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Full frontage improvements, including a 1.8 m wide concrete sidewalk, on-street parallel parking, streetlights as needed, and boulevard plantings per the Parks Department requirements; 2. A storm water management plan; and 3. A construction parking management plan. ii. That the developer will connect and be responsible for any upgrades required to the services and utilities required for the development; iii. That the building be strata titled into individual residential units prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer; iv. That the developer consolidate the parcels in accordance with the CC1 zone regulations, prior to the issuance of a development permit; v. That a separate covenant be registered prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed residential building(s) that ensures parking is allocated to each unit and visitors as required by the zoning bylaw and is not provided in exchange for compensation separate from that of a residential unit; and vi. That 100% of residential parking spaces, excluding visitor parking spaces, shall include conduits capable of providing wiring for Level 2 Electric Vehicle charging in the future; and 1. All conduits must be connected to electrical rooms; 2. Where an electric vehicle energy management system is provided all communications equipment, control systems, and other devices required to operate the EVMS shall be installed; and 3. All conduits shall be labelled for the use of electric vehicle charging; and 4. A separate covenant requiring the owner to construct the EV charging system in accordance with a plan approved by the City, repair and maintain and otherwise keep the EV charging system in operation, and not doing anything that would prevent an owner, occupant, or tenant from installing the EV charging equipment. Motion CARRIED. Page 143 of 395 ### Page 144 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 144 Minutes of the PZAH Committee Meeting - May 30, 2022 5 5.3 Application to Rezone 845, 847, 849, and 867 Goldstream Avenue from the C8A (Community Town Centre Pedestrian A) and C3 (District Commercial) Zones to the CCP (City Centre Pedestrian) Zone to allow for a future development MOVED BY: ICKOVICH SECONDED: BROWN THAT the Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee recommend that Council: 1. Proceed with consideration of 1st reading of Bylaw No. 2079 to amend the zoning designation of the properties located at 845, 847, 849, and 867 Goldstream Avenue from the Community Town Centre Pedestrian A (C8A) Zone and the District Commercial (C3) Zone to the City Centre Pedestrian (CCP) Zone subject to the following terms and conditions: a. That the applicant provides, as a bonus for increased density, the following contributions per residential unit, prior to issuance of a building permit: i. $750 towards the Affordable Housing Fund; and ii. $2,850 towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund. Subject to reductions in accordance with the Affordable Housing and Amenity Contribution Policy depending on use and height. b. That the applicant provides, as a bonus for increased density, the following contributions per square meter of commercial space, prior to issuance of a building permit: i. $10.75 towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund. c. That the applicant provides, prior to Public Hearing, the following to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering: i. A technical memo from a qualified engineer that verifies stormwater can be adequately managed on-site for future development. ii. A Traffic Impact Assessment memo that examines the density differences between the existing and proposed zones to determine whether or not any improvements are warranted to the Goldstream Avenue and Jacklin Road intersection. iii. A memo prepared by a Landscape Architect that examines existing trees on site and in the frontage and provides comment on the potential for tree retention as part of the development plan, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning; d. That the applicant provides, prior to Bylaw Adoption, a Section 219 covenant, registered in priority of all other charges on title, that agrees to the following: i. That the three properties at 845, 847, and 849 Goldstream Avenue be consolidated prior to issuance of a Development Permit for Form and Character; Page 144 of 395 ### Page 145 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 145 Minutes of the PZAH Committee Meeting - May 30, 2022 6 ii. That a reciprocal access easement be registered between the two future properties prior to issuance of a Development Permit for Form and Character; if required by the Director of Planning; iii. That a minimum of 5% of the land be dedicated to the City or secured for public use by Statutory Right-of-Way and be constructed as a public amenity such as a plaza, landscaped seating area, or other similar amenity, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning. The land shall be provided or secured prior to issuance of a building permit and the design approved as part of the required Development Permit; iv. That the following are implemented to Bylaw 1000 standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Frontage improvements, including mitigating options from the approved Traffic Impact Assessment; 2. A storm water management plan; and 3. A construction parking management plan. v. That the developer will connect and be responsible for any upgrades required to the services and utilities required for the development; vi. That the building be strata titled into individual residential units prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer; vii. That a separate covenant be registered prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed residential building(s) that ensures parking is allocated to each unit and visitors as required by the zoning bylaw and is not provided in exchange for compensation separate from that of a residential unit; viii. That 100% of residential parking spaces, excluding visitor parking spaces, shall include conduits capable of providing wiring for Level 2 Electric Vehicle charging in the future; and 1. All conduits must be connected to electrical rooms; 2. Where an electric vehicle energy management system (“EVMS”) is provided all communications equipment, control systems, and other devices required to operate the EVMS shall be installed; and 3. All conduits shall be labelled for the use of electric vehicle charging; and 4. The owner must construct the EV charging system in accordance with a plan approved by the City, repair and maintain and otherwise keep the EV charging system in operation, and not do anything that would prevent a strata owner, occupant, or tenant from installing the EV charging equipment. Page 145 of 395 ### Page 146 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 146 Minutes of the PZAH Committee Meeting - May 30, 2022 7 2. Proceed with consideration of 1st reading of Bylaw No. 2079 to amend the text of the CCP Zone to allow 867 Goldstream Avenue all the permitted uses of the CCP Zone with 28m of frontage. Motion CARRIED. 6. ADJOURNMENT The Chair adjourned the meeting at 6:41 pm. Presiding Council Member Certified Correct - Corporate Officer Page 146 of 395 ### Page 147 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 147 Page 1 of 12 t 250.478.7882 e administration@langford.ca 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, BC V9B 2X8 Staff Report to the Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee DATE: Monday, May 30, 2022 DEPARTMENT: Planning APPLICATION NO.: Z21-0008 SUBJECT: Application to Rezone 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Road from the RR2 (Rural Residential 2) Zone to the RT1 (Residential Townhouse 1) Zone to allow for the development of approximately 16 Townhouse Units PURPOSE Terry Farnese of Farnese & Associates has applied on behalf of the property owners to rezone 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Road from the RR2 (Rural Residential 2) Zone to the RT1 (Residential Townhouse 1) Zone in order to allow for a townhouse development of approximately 16 units. PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS The City has not received any previous planning applications on the subject properties. Table 1: Site Data Applicant Terry Farnese Owners Stephen Elsas, Michele Elsas, Aaron Elsas, Daniel Elsas Civic Addresses 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Road Legal Descriptions Lot 5, Section 83, Esquimalt District, Plan 6859 Lot 6, Section 83, Esquimalt District, Plan 6859 Size of Properties 2,580m² (0.6 acres) DP Areas Drainage Concern, Riparian Area, Sooke Road Revitalization Area Zoning Designation Existing: Rural Residential (RR2) Proposed: Residential Townhouse (RT1) OCP Designation Existing: Neighbourhood Proposed: Neighbourhood Page 147 of 395 ### Page 148 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 148 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 2 of 12 SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA Each property contains detached dwelling units along with accessory buildings. These properties are generally flat and contain a variety of bushes and trees throughout. To the north and west are commercial sites. South and east of these properties are residential uses and one of Langford’s Fire Halls. Council may wish to require that the applicant submit a memo prepared by a Landscape Architect prior to Public Hearing that examines the existing trees on site as well as within the frontage and provides comment on the potential for tree retention as part of the development plan. Figure 1 - Current Condition of Subject Properties Table 2: Surrounding Land Uses Zoning Use North District Commercial (C3) Commercial East Neighbourhood Commercial (C1) Community Institutional (P2) Commercial Fire Hall South Rural Residential 2 (RR2) Residential West Rural Residential 2 (RR2) Care Facility Page 148 of 395 ### Page 149 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 149 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 3 of 12 Figure 2 - Subject Properties OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN The Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaw No. 1200 designates the subject property as ‘Neighbourhood’, which is defined by the following text:  Predominantly residential precinct that supports a range of low and medium density housing choices including secondary suites  This area allows for residential and mixed-use commercial intensification of streets that connect centres and/or are serviced by transit  Schools, community facilities and other institutional uses are permitted throughout the area  Retail serving local residents is encouraged along transportation corridors  Parks, open spaces, and recreational facilities are integrated throughout the area  This area allows for Neighbourhood Centres to emerge in the form of medium density mixed-use nodes at key intersections. Page 149 of 395 ### Page 150 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 150 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 4 of 12 Figure 3 - A Concept for Neighbourhood DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREAS The subject property is located within the Drainage Concern, Riparian Area, and Sooke Road Revitalization Development Permit (DP) Areas. A DP to address the environmental aspects would need to be issued prior to any alterations to the land. A DP would also be required for the Form and Character of the units, which would also include aspects that address the Sooke Road Revitalization design concept. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to consolidate the two subject properties and create a single strata that would include approximately 16 townhouses. There would be a centralized common driveway with access to Happy Valley only. An overall concept plan that illustrates the proposed layout is attached as Appendix A. A rendering of the intended design is provided in Appendix B. As noted, this design will be further review and assessed in relation to the applicable design guidelines as part of the DP Process. No variances are requested. Table 3: Proposed Data Permitted by RR2 (Current Zone) Permitted by RT1 (Proposed Zone) Permitted Uses  Dwelling, One-Family  Dwelling, Two-Family  Group Day Care  Dwelling, One-Family  Townhouse Density n/a 1.2 FAR Height 10.5m (34.4 ft) 10.0m (32.8 ft) Site Coverage n/a 60% max Front Yard Setback 7.5m (24.6 ft) 3.0m (9.8 ft), and 5.5 (18 ft) for the garage portion Interior Side Yard Setback 3.0m (9.80 ft) 1.2 (4 ft) Page 150 of 395 ### Page 151 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 151 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 5 of 12 FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS Happy Valley Road The applicant will be required to provide full frontage improvements along Happy Valley Road in accordance with Bylaw 1000, prior to issuance of a building permit. Improvements are anticipated to include boulevard landscaping with irrigation, street lighting, a bike lane, sidewalk that may include red brick pavers as per the Sooke Revitalization DP area, and possibly parking scallops. In order to determine if the above improvements can fit within the existing road right of way, Engineering has requested that frontage drawings are provided prior to Public Hearing in case road dedication is required. Additionally, a Traffic Impact Assessment is requested to examine the proposed driveway location in relation to Firehall Creek Road. Private Strata Road The applicant will need to construct the private strata road prior to subdivision approval, and to appropriate engineering standards. SEWERS A sewer main does exist within Happy Valley along the frontage of this site. The developer will be required to connect the new development to this main and obtain approval of civil engineering drawings for this work. Any sewer extensions or modifications within the municipal road right-of-way will be constructed by West Shore Environmental Services at the applicant’s expense. DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT This site is located within an area where stormwater is to be managed through infiltration. As a condition of rezoning, Council may wish to request the applicant to examine how stormwater can be managed on- site and have a technical memo from a qualified engineer be provided in this regard to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering prior to Public Hearing. A full stormwater management plan will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Exterior Side Yard Setback 3.0m (9.8 ft), and 5.5 (18 ft) for the garage portion 3.5m (11.5 ft), and 5.5 (18 ft) for the garage portion Rear Yard Setback 10m (32.8 ft) 5.5m (18 ft) Parking Requirement 2.0 per dwelling 1.0 per secondary suite 2.0 per dwelling, plus 3 visitor stalls Page 151 of 395 ### Page 152 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 152 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 6 of 12 FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS Rezoning the subject properties to permit higher density of development will increase the assessed value of lands and eventually will increase municipal revenue due to the number of units created. As the developer is required to complete all frontage improvements, the direct capital costs to the City associated with this development will be negligible. A summary of Amenity Contributions and Development Cost Charges that the developer will be expected to pay, is outlined in Tables 4 and 5 below. COUNCIL’S AMENITY CONTRIBUTION POLICY The amenity contributions that apply as per Council’s current Affordable Housing, Park and Amenity Contribution Policy are summarized in Table 4 below, which is based on 16 residential units. Table 4: Amenity Contributions per Council Policy Amenity Item Per Unit Contribution Total (16 units) Affordable Housing Reserve Fund $610 $9,760 General Amenity Reserve Fund $3,660 $58,560 Total $68,320 DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES The development cost charges that would apply to this development are summarized in Table 5 below, and are based on 16 residential units. Table 5: Development Cost Charges Development Cost Charge Per Unit Contribution Total (16 units) Roads $3,865 $61,840 Park Improvement $1,890 $30,240 Park Acquisition $1,100 $17,600 ISIF Fees $371.25 $5,940 Subtotal (DCC’s to Langford) $115,620 CRD Water $1,644 $26,304 School Site Acquisition $800 $12,800 TOTAL DCC’s (estimated) $154,724 Page 152 of 395 ### Page 153 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 153 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 7 of 12 OPTIONS: Option 1 THAT the Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee recommend that Council: 1. Proceed with consideration of Bylaw No. 1993 to amend the zoning designation of the property located at 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Road from Rural Residential 2 (RR2) Zone to Residential Townhouse 1 (RT1) Zone, subject to the following terms and conditions: a) That the applicant agrees to provide, as a bonus for increased density, the following contributions per new dwelling unit, prior to issuance of a building permit: i. $3,660 towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund; and ii. $610 towards the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund. b) That the applicant provides, prior to Public Hearing, the following: i. A technical memo from a qualified engineer that verifies storm water can be adequately managed onsite, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering; and ii. Frontage drawings to determine if road dedication is required, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering. iii. A memo prepared by a Landscape Architect that examines existing trees on site and in the frontage and provides comment on the potential for tree retention as part of the development plan, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning; c) That the applicant provides, prior to Bylaw Adoption, a Section 219 covenant, registered in priority of all other charges on title, that agrees to complete the following prior to issuance of a building permit, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering: i. Full frontage improvements to Bylaw 1000 standards and any recommendations stemming from the Traffic Impact Assessment; and ii. A storm water management plan; and iii. A construction management plan. OR Option 2 THAT the Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee recommend that Council take no action at this time with respect to this application to rezone 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Road. Page 153 of 395 ### Page 154 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 154 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 8 of 12 SUBMITTED BY: Robert Dykstra, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Concurrence: Leah Stohmann, MCIP, RPP Deputy Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Donna Petrie, Manager of Business Development and Events Concurrence: Will Ying-udomrat, Manager of Legislative Services Concurrence: Matthew Baldwin, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Michelle Mahovlich, P.Eng, P.Geo, Director of Engineering and Public Works Concurrence: Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance Concurrence: Marie Watmough, Acting Director of Corporate Services Concurrence: Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer Page 154 of 395 ### Page 155 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 155 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 9 of 12 Appendix A SITE PLAN Page 155 of 395 ### Page 156 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 156 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 10 of 12 Appendix B RENDERINGS Page 156 of 395 ### Page 157 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 157 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 11 of 12 Appendix C SITE MAP Page 157 of 395 ### Page 158 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 158 Z21-0008 – 3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 12 of 12 Appendix D LOCATION MAP Page 158 of 395 ### Page 159 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 159 CITY OF LANGFORD BYLAW NO. 1993 A BYLAW TO AMEND BYLAW NO. 300, “LANGFORD ZONING BYLAW, 1999" The Council of the City of Langford, in open meeting assembled, hereby enacts as follows: A. Langford Zoning Bylaw No. 300, 1999 is amended as follows: 1. By deleting from the Rural Residential 2 (RR2) Zone and adding to the Residential Townhouse 1 (RT1) Zone the properties legally described as LOTS 5 and 6, SECTION 83, ESQUIMALT DISTRICT, PLAN 6859, PID No. 005-801-524 and 005-801-575 (3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rd) in the portions as shown shaded on Plan No. 1 attached to and forming part of this Bylaw. 2. By adding the following to Table 1 of Schedule AD: Zone Bylaw No. Legal Description Amenity Contributions Eligible for Reduction in Section 2 of Schedule AD (Column 5) RT1 1993 LOTS 5 and 6, SECTION 83, ESQUIMALT DISTRICT, PLAN 6859, PID No. 005-801-524, 005-801-575 (3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rd) a) 3,660 per townhouse unit towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund; and b) $610 per townhouse unit towards the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund No B. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 633, (3208 and 3212 Happy Valley Rd), Bylaw No. 1993, 2021". READ A FIRST TIME this day of , 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held this day of, 2022. READ A SECOND TIME this day of 2022. READ A THIRD TIME this day of , 2022. APPROVED BY THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE this day of , 2022. ADOPTED this day of, 2022. MAYOR (Certified Correct) CORPORATE OFFICER Page 159 of 395 ### Page 160 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 160 Bylaw No. 1993 Page 2 of 2 Schedule A Page 160 of 395 ### Page 161 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 161 Page 1 of 13 t 250.478.7882 e administration@langford.ca 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, BC V9B 2X8 Staff Report to the Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee DATE: Monday, May 30, 2022 DEPARTMENT: Planning APPLICATION NO.: Z22-0011 SUBJECT: Bylaw No. 2080 - Application to Rezone 975, 979, and 983 Bray Avenue from the R2 (One- and Two-Family Residential) Zone to CC1 (City Centre) Zone to Allow for a Six- Storey Apartment Building PURPOSE Grayland Consulting and Norm Rakhra have applied on behalf of Thomas & Lance Beaven, Faye & Michael McNall, Aila Clark, and Barbara Turner to rezone 975, 979, and 983 Bray Avenue from R2 (One- and Two- Family Residential) to CC1 (City Centre) to allow for a six-storey apartment building with approximately 115 units. BACKGROUND PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS There have been no previous applications for any of the subject properties. Table 1: Site Data Applicant Grayland Consulting and Norm Rakhra Owner Thomas & Lance Beaven (975 Bray) Faye & Michael McNall (979 Bray) Aila Clark and Barbara Turner (983 Bray) Civic Address 975, 979, and 983 Bray Avenue Legal Description LOT 5, SECTION 79, ESQUIMALT DISTRICT, PLAN 11150 (975 Bray) LOT 1, SECTION 79, ESQUIMALT DISTRICT, PLAN 13219 (979 Bray) LOT 2, SECTION 79, ESQUIMALT DISTRICT, PLAN 13219 (983 Bray) Size of Property 2,661 m2 (combined total) DP Areas City Centre Zoning Designation R2 (One- and Two-Family Residential) OCP Designation City Centre Page 161 of 395 ### Page 162 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 162 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 2 of 13 SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA The existing properties each contain a single-family dwelling, and all properties are flat in nature. There are a few large trees and bushes throughout, but these properties, as well as surrounding properties have minimal tree coverage overall. The surrounding neighbourhood is made up of a mix of single-family dwellings and duplexes, but has had several new developments underway, including two six-storey apartments across the street, a townhouse development on the corner of Bray and Carlow, and two residential towers of 24 and 15 storeys each containing ground floor commercial uses at the corner of Bray and Jacklin. To the north of the subject properties is Centennial Park which contains baseball diamonds, tennis courts, and a playground/splash park. Council may wish to require that the applicant submit a memo prepared by a Landscape Architect prior to Public Hearing that examines the existing trees on site as well as within the frontage and provides comment on the potential for tree retention as part of the development plan. Figure 1 – Subject Properties Page 162 of 395 ### Page 163 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 163 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 3 of 13 Table 2: Surrounding Land Uses Zoning Use North CC1 (City Centre) Two Six-Storey Apartments (construction to commence shortly) East R2 (One- and Two-Family Residential) Single Family Dwellings and Duplexes South RM3 (Apartment) Low-rise Apartment West R2 (One- and Two-Family Residential) Single Family Dwellings and Duplexes COMMENTS OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN The Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaw No. 1200 designated the subject properties as “City Centre”, which is defined by the following text:  A major regional growth centre that supports a wide range of high-density housing, including affordable and rental housing  A major employment area for institutional, office, commercial, light industrial uses  Major civic uses and public buildings are key landmarks  A major place of community gathering and celebration  A wide range of public squares, parks and open spaces are integrated throughout  The City’s major entertainment and/or cultural precinct  Inter-city and/or inter-regional transit hub connect residents Figure 2 - A Concept for the City Centre DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREAS The subject properties are not located within any environmental or hazardous development permit areas. However, a form and character development permit would be required prior to the issuance of a building permit to review overall compliance with the City Centre and Multi-Family design guidelines as well as zoning bylaw requirements Page 163 of 395 ### Page 164 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 164 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 4 of 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES The subject properties are located within the Centennial Park (S1) neighbourhood of the City Centre Design Guidelines as outlined below. For this region of the City Center, the design intent is as follows: It is further noted for Council’s information that the subject properties are designated as being appropriate for consideration of the CC1 zone within the City Centre Concept map which is included in the City Centre Design Guidelines. COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The applicant has applied to rezone 975, 979, and 983 Bray Avenue from R2 (One- and Two-Family Residential) to CC1 (City Centre) to allow for a six-storey apartment building with approximately 115 residential units. The proposal contains a generous amount of common outdoor amenity space including a large space in the southeast corner of the site, a smaller communal balcony on the 6th floor, and a large communal rooftop space. At present, the applicant has proposed that these spaces contain multiple barbeques, fire pits, play structures for children, various seating areas, vegetable garden beds, among other amenities. The CC1 zone requires at least 5% of the lot area be dedicated to outdoor common amenity space for residents and this proposal offers nearly 28%. The ground floor site plan can be seen below in Figure 3. Page 164 of 395 ### Page 165 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 165 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 5 of 13 Figure 3 – Ground floor site plan As shown above, the frontage of the property is made up of residential units with individual access at grade, and the main lobby entrance. This proposal meets the CC1 zoning requirement for at least 80% active building frontage which helps to create a more engaging street presence. The parking access ramp is located along the eastern property boundary that leads down to two floors of underground parking. Presently, the proposal demonstrates a residential unit makeup of 20 studios, 67 one-bedrooms, 22 one- bedrooms plus den, 26 two-bedrooms, and 2 penthouse units containing two-bedrooms plus a den. Council may wish to have the applicant register a building strata plan as a condition of rezoning prior to issuance of an occupancy permit and have this provision secured within a section 219 covenant registered on title to remain consistent with other applications of this type. As the subject properties are located within the City Centre and no units are intended to be larger than two-bedrooms, a parking rate of 1.25 parking spaces per unit is required, where the 0.25 will be allocated to visitors. With 115 residential units, 144 parking spaces are required, of which 29 spaces will be Page 165 of 395 ### Page 166 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 166 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 6 of 13 designated for visitors. The proposed plans currently demonstrate 144 parking spaces, which meets the bylaw requirements. If the applicant chooses to change their unit make-up later to include 3-bedroom units, a rate of 2.25 parking spaces per unit will apply to units of that size or larger. Parking requirements will be re-confirmed at the time of development permit. To remain consistent with other multi-family developments that have recently been rezoned, Council may wish to require the onsite parking stalls be secured to each unit in accordance with the Zoning Bylaw to ensure separate rent is not charged for a parking space. This would prevent future tenants from declining to pay separately for a parking stall and choosing to park on the surrounding streets instead. For vehicle options in the future, Council may wish to remain consistent in requiring the onsite parking spaces to be equipped with infrastructure so that electric charging stations can be installed at a future date without the need of an expensive retrofit to the building. Given the future development of electric vehicles, this may be viewed as a proactive step that would allow residents of the building a wider choice of vehicles in years to come. Council is currently considering Bylaw No. 2054 to amend the Zoning Bylaw such that this will be a standard requirement for all multi-family buildings. As such, a covenant to secure this infrastructure will only be needed if Bylaw No. 2054 isn’t adopted prior to Council’s consideration of Bylaw Adoption for this rezoning. The applicant has provided renderings for their proposed design, as shown below in Figure 4. Figure 4 – Project Rendering Page 166 of 395 ### Page 167 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 167 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 7 of 13 The applicant has not requested any variances for their proposal, as shown below. Table 3: Proposal Data Permitted by CC1 (Proposed Zoning) Proposed by this Application Density (FAR and/or min. lot size) 5.0 FAR 3.0 Height 6 storeys 6 storeys Site Coverage n/a 59% Front Yard Setback 2 m (6.6 ft) for 1st storey 4 m (13 ft) for 3+ storeys 4 m for all storeys Interior Side Yard Setback 3.0m (9.8 ft) 3 m Exterior Side Yard Setback 2 m (6.6 ft) for 1st storey 4 m (13 ft) for 3+ storeys n/a Rear Yard Setback 3.0m (9.8 ft) 3 m Parking Requirement 1.25 spaces per residential unit (0.25 of which is for visitors) 1.25 spaces per residential unit (0.25 of which is for visitors) PEDESTRIAN, CYCLING AND MOTORIST NETWORK The subject properties are located in Langford’s City Centre, meaning the site is within walking and cycling distance to many shops, services, and transit opportunities. Sidewalks are not present along the entirety of Bray at this time, but gaps are anticipated to be filled in as developments are approved and completed in the future. The site is also closely located to the E&N trail that provides a separated walking and cycling path from Langford to downtown Victoria. The Director of Engineering has noted that a Traffic Impact Assessment is not required as the proposal is consistent with the City’s Official Community Plan. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS The required frontage improvements will include a 1.8 m wide concrete sidewalk, on-street parallel parking, streetlights as needed, and boulevard plantings per the Parks Department requirements. The Director of Engineering has requested that a frontage drawing be submitted prior to Public Hearing to ensure road dedication is not needed to accommodate the required improvements. DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER As a condition of rezoning, Council may wish to request the applicant to examine how storm water can be managed on-site through infiltration and have a technical memo from a qualified engineer be provided in this regard to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering prior to public hearing. Page 167 of 395 ### Page 168 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 168 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 8 of 13 CONSTRUCTION PARKING AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN Council may wish to require a Construction Parking and Traffic Management Plan as a condition of rezoning and require that it be provided to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering prior to any land alteration. This should be secured within a covenant, prior to Bylaw Adoption. FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Rezoning the subject properties to permit higher density of development will increase the assessed value of lands and eventually will increase municipal revenue due to the number of units created. As the developer is responsible to complete all frontage improvements, the direct capital costs to the City associated with this development will be negligible. A summary of Amenity Contributions and Development Cost Charges that the developer will be expected to pay, is outlined in Tables 4 and 5 below. COUNCIL’S AMENITY CONTRIBUTION POLICY The amenity contributions that apply as per Council’s current Affordable Housing, Park and Amenity Contribution Policy are summarized in Table 4 below, based the current floor plans and total density of 115 residential units. Table 4 – Amenity Contributions per Council Policy Amenity Item Per unit / area contribution Total General Amenity Reserve Fund $2,850 per residential unit (1st through 4th storeys) @78 units = $222,300 $1,425 per residential unit (5th & 6th storeys) @37 units = $52,725 Affordable Housing Reserve Fund $750 per residential unit (1st through 4th storeys) @78 units = $58,500 $375 per residential unit (5th and 6th storeys) @37 units = $13,875 TOTAL POLICY CONTRIBUTIONS $347,400 Table 5 – Development Cost Charges Development Cost Charge Per unit contribution Total (115 units) Roads $3,092.39 per unit $355,624.85 Park Improvement $1,890 per unit $217,350 Park Acquisition $1,100 per unit $126,500 Incremental Storage Improvement Fees $331.65 per unit $38,139.75 Subtotal (DCCs paid to City of Langford) $737,614.60 Page 168 of 395 ### Page 169 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 169 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 9 of 13 CRD Water $1,644 per unit $189,060 School Site Acquisition $600 per unit $69,000 TOTAL (estimate) DCCs $995,674.60 OPTIONS: Option 1 That the Planning, Zoning, and Affordable Housing Committee recommend that Council: 1. Proceed with consideration of Bylaw No. 2080 to amend the zoning designation of 975, 979, and 983 Bray Avenue from R2 (One- and Two-Family Residential) to CC1 (City Centre) subject to the following terms and conditions: a. That the applicant provides, as a bonus for increased density, the following contributions per residential unit, prior to the issuance of a building permit: i. $750 towards the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund; and ii. $2,850 towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund; Subject to reductions depending on the use and height in accordance with the Affordable Housing and Amenity Contribution Policy. b. That the applicant provides the following, prior to Public Hearing: i. A technical memo from an engineer that verifies storm water can be adequately managed on-site for the proposed developments, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering; ii. A frontage drawing to confirm if road dedication is required to complete all required frontage improvements, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering; and iii. A memo prepared by a Landscape Architect that examines existing trees on site and in the frontage and provides comment on the potential for tree retention as part of the development plan, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning; c. That the applicant registers, prior to Bylaw Adoption, a road dedication plan, if required, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering; d. That the applicant provides, prior to Bylaw Adoption, a Section 219 covenant, registered in priority of all other charges on title, that agrees to the following: Page 169 of 395 ### Page 170 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 170 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 10 of 13 i. That the following will be provided and implemented to Bylaw No. 1000 standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Full frontage improvements, including a 1.8 m wide concrete sidewalk, on-street parallel parking, streetlights as needed, and boulevard plantings per the Parks Department requirements; 2. A storm water management plan; and 3. A construction parking management plan. ii. That the developer will connect and be responsible for any upgrades required to the services and utilities required for the development; iii. That the building be strata titled into individual residential units prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer; iv. That the developer consolidate the parcels in accordance with the CC1 zone regulations, prior to the issuance of a development permit; v. That a separate covenant be registered prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed residential building(s) that ensures parking is allocated to each unit and visitors as required by the zoning bylaw and is not provided in exchange for compensation separate from that of a residential unit; and vi. That 100% of residential parking spaces, excluding visitor parking spaces, shall include conduits capable of providing wiring for Level 2 Electric Vehicle charging in the future; and 1. All conduits must be connected to electrical rooms; 2. Where an electric vehicle energy management system is provided all communications equipment, control systems, and other devices required to operate the EVMS shall be installed; and 3. All conduits shall be labelled for the use of electric vehicle charging; and 4. A separate covenant requiring the owner to construct the EV charging system in accordance with a plan approved by the City, repair and maintain and otherwise keep the EV charging system in operation, and not doing anything that would prevent an owner, occupant, or tenant from installing the EV charging equipment. OR Option 2 That the Planning, Zoning, and Affordable Housing Committee recommend that Council: Page 170 of 395 ### Page 171 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 171 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 11 of 13 1. Take no action at this time with respect to this application to rezone 975-983 Bray Ave. SUBMITTED BY: Julia Buckingham, Planner II Concurrence: Leah Stohmann, MCIP, RPP, Deputy Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Donna Petrie, Manager of Business Development and Events Concurrence: Will Ying-udomrat, Manager of Legislative Services Concurrence: Matthew Baldwin, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Michelle Mahovlich, P.Eng, P.Geo, Director of Engineering and Public Works Concurrence: Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance Concurrence: Marie Watmough, Acting Director of Corporate Services Concurrence: Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer Page 171 of 395 ### Page 172 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 172 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 12 of 13 Appendix A – Site Map Page 172 of 395 ### Page 173 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 173 975, 979, and 983 Bray Ave Z22-0011 Page 13 of 13 Appendix B – Location Map Page 173 of 395 ### Page 174 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 174 CITY OF LANGFORD BYLAW NO. 2080 A BYLAW TO AMEND BYLAW NO. 300, “LANGFORD ZONING BYLAW, 1999" The Council of the City of Langford, in open meeting assembled, hereby enacts as follows: A. Langford Zoning Bylaw No. 300, 1999 is amended as follows: 1. By deleting from the One- and Two-Family Residential (R2) Zone and adding to the City Centre (CC1) Zone the properties legally described as: · Lot 5, Section 79, Esquimalt District, Plan11150, PID No. 005-119-367 (975 Bray Avenue); · Lot 1, Section 79, Esquimalt District, Plan13219, PID No. 004-735-544 (979 Bray Avenue); and · Lot 2, Section 79, Esquimalt District, Plan13219, PID No. 000-948-730 (983 Bray Avenue); as shown shaded on Plan No. 1 attached to and forming part of this Bylaw. 2. By adding the following to Table 1 of Schedule AD: Zone Bylaw No. Legal Description Amenity Contributions Eligible for Reduction in Section 2 of Schedule AD CC1 2080 · Lot 5, Section 79, Esquimalt District, Plan11150, PID No. 005-119-367 (975 Bray Avenue); · Lot 1, Section 79, Esquimalt District, Plan13219, PID No. 004-735-544 (979 Bray Avenue); and · Lot 2, Section 79, Esquimalt District, Plan13219, PID No. 000-948-730 (983 Bray Avenue) a) $2,850 per new residential unit created on the 1st to 4th storeys of the building towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund; b) $1,425 per new residential unit created on the 5th and 6th storeys of the building towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund; c) $750 per new residential unit created on the 1st to 4th storeys of the building towards the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund; d) $375 per new residential unit created on the 5th and 6th storeys of the building towards the No Page 174 of 395 ### Page 175 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 175 Bylaw No. 2080 Page 2 of 3 Affordable Housing Reserve Fund; B. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 678, (975, 979, and 983 Bray Avenue), Bylaw No. 2080, 2022". READ A FIRST TIME this day of , 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held this day of , 2022. READ A SECOND TIME this day of , 2022. READ A THIRD TIME this day of , 2022. APPROVED BY THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE this day of , 2022. ADOPTED this day of , 2022. PRESIDING COUNCIL MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Page 175 of 395 ### Page 176 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 176 Bylaw No. 2080 Page 3 of 3 Schedule A Page 176 of 395 ### Page 177 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 177 Page 1 of 14 t 250.478.7882 e administration@langford.ca 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, BC V9B 2X8 Staff Report to the Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee DATE: Monday, May 30, 2022 DEPARTMENT: Planning APPLICATION NO.: Z22-0015 SUBJECT: Application to Rezone 845, 847, 849, and 867 Goldstream Avenue from the C8A (Community Town Centre Pedestrian A) and C3 (District Commercial) Zones to the CCP (City Centre Pedestrian) Zone to allow for a future development PURPOSE Rachael Sansom of Grayland Consulting has applied on behalf of Morland Enterprises Inc. and 671455 BC Ltd. to rezone 845 - 867 Goldstream Avenue from the C8A (Community Town Centre Pedestrian A) and C3 (District Commercial) Zones to the CCP (City Centre Pedestrian) Zone. This is being proposed in order to allow for a future redevelopment in accordance with the requirements of the CCP Zone and City Centre Design Guidelines. PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS The City has received various planning applications in the past on these properties, which include the following:  DVP96-0004 – related to canopy signage.  DP96-0007 – related to the construction of a single-storey commercial building.  DP98-0024 – related to the construction of a drive-thru restaurant.  Z07-0001 – related to legalizing an existing commercial use.  DP18-0055 – related to a Form and Character change to the façade of the Tim Horton’s restaurant. Table 1: Site Data Applicant Grayland Consulting Ltd. Owners Morland Enterprises Inc. and 671455 BC Ltd. Civic Addresses 845, 847, 849, and 867 Goldstream Avenue Page 177 of 395 ### Page 178 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 178 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 2 of 14 Legal Descriptions Lot A, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan VIP64401 Lot B, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan VIP64401 Lot 2, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan 17987 Lot B, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan 24248 Size of Properties 8,090m² (2 acres) DP Areas City Centre Zoning Designation Existing: Community Town Centre Pedestrian A’ (C8A) and District Commercial (C3) Proposed: City Centre Pedestrian (CCP) OCP Designation Existing: City Centre Proposed: City Centre SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA Amongst the four existing properties there are three buildings, including a drive-thru Tim Horton’s, a 2- storey multi-tenant commercial building, and a one-storey commercial building containing an office. 849 Goldstream is vacant and utilized for overflow parking. To the north and east are properties that contain mixed-use buildings as well as single-family residential dwellings. To the west is a commercial building (City Hall) and to the south is a mobile home park. Council may wish to require that the applicant submit a memo prepared by a Landscape Architect prior to Public Hearing that examines the existing trees on site as well as within the frontage and provides comment on tree retention as part of the development plan. Figure 1 – Current Conditions of Subject Properties Page 178 of 395 ### Page 179 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 179 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 3 of 14 Table 2: Surrounding Land Uses Zoning Use North One- and Two-Family Residential (R2) Community Town Centre Pedestrian (C8) Residential Mixed-Use Multi-Family And Commercial East Community Town Centre Pedestrian (C8) Mixed-Use Multi-Family And Commercial South Mobile Home Park (RH1) Residential West District Commercial (C3) Commercial Figure 2 – Subject Properties Page 179 of 395 ### Page 180 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 180 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 4 of 14 COUNCIL POLICY OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN The Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaw No. 1200 designates the subject property as ‘City Centre’, which is defined by the following text:  A major regional growth centre that support a wide range of high-density housing, including affordable and rental housing  A major employment area for institutional, office, commercial, light industrial uses  Major civic uses and public buildings are key landmarks  A major place of community gathering and celebration  A wide range of public squares, parks and open spaces are integrated throughout  The City’s major entertainment and/or cultural precinct  Inter-city and/or inter-regional transit hub connect residents Figure 3 – A Concept for the City Centre DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREAS The subject properties are not located within any of the Environmental Protection or Hazardous Area Development Permit Areas. However, these properties are located within the City Centre Development Permit Area and therefore a Development Permit for Form and Character will be required. This is anticipated to be received at a later date and will be reviewed in accordance with the CCP Zone and Design Guidelines at that time. DESIGN GUIDELINES The subject properties are located within the ‘S2 City Hall’ area of the City Centre Neighbourhoods outlined in the Design Guidelines as illustrated in Figure 4. For this region of the City Centre, the design intent is as follows: Page 180 of 395 ### Page 181 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 181 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 5 of 14 The City Hall neighbourhood has a wide variety of uses from light industrial to mixed-use and residential. This neighbourhood, due to the variety of uses and central location in the City Centre, serves as a representation for the remainder of the City. Development within this neighbourhood shall include medium- and high-density residential as well as mixed-use buildings along Goldstream Avenue, Peatt Road and Jacklin Road. Buildings not used for residential purposes, shall incorporate and blend design to maximize consistency. Emphasis within the City Hall neighbourhood shall be to create a walkable, pedestrian-oriented neighbourhood. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL While there is no formal development proposal at this time, in accordance with the requirements of the CCP Zone, any development on the subject site would include at least 2 floors of commercial units, with multi-family residential units being permitted above the second floor. The lower façade along Goldstream would be designed with active frontage, such that entryways to commercial units have direct access from the sidewalk, thereby ensuring an interactive pedestrian frontage. The CCP Zone also requires that a minimum of 5% of the site be provided as common outdoor amenity space for the residents living at this location, and all the required onsite parking would be provided for in accordance with the Zoning Bylaw. As this is a large, prominent site in the core of the downtown, Council may furthermore wish to require that 5% of the site be provided as public amenity space. This could take the form of a plaza, landscaped seating areas, or similarly programmed public areas. The design will be approved and incorporated into the landscape plan at the time of development permit, and the land provided either as amenity land or secured by Statutory Right of Way prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. To remain consistent with other multi-family developments that have recently been rezoned, Council may wish to require the onsite parking stalls be secured to each unit in accordance with the Zoning Bylaw parking requirements to ensure separate rent is not charged for a parking space. This would prevent future tenants/owners from declining to pay separately for a parking stall and choosing to park on the surrounding streets instead. Figure 4 – S2 City Hall Page 181 of 395 ### Page 182 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 182 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 6 of 14 With respect to type of units, Langford has seen a concentration of rental apartments among multi-family residential developments. In an effort to provide options for future home ownership and ensure flexibility of housing types for all residents, Council may wish to require developers to strata title the buildings prior to occupancy so that individual units may be offered for sale if market conditions change at some later date. Taking this step does not impede the use of the building as a rental if the applicant wishes to but ensures that a building is appropriately constructed and will not require potentially costly upgrades if strata title conversion is sought in the future. Council may wish to have the applicant register a building strata plan as a condition of rezoning prior to issuance of an occupancy permit and have this provision secured within a section 219 covenant registered on title. Additionally, Council may wish to require the onsite parking spaces to be equipped with infrastructure so that electric charging stations can be installed at a future date without the need of an expensive retrofit to the building. Given the future development of electric vehicles, this may be viewed as a proactive step that would allow residents of the building a wider choice of vehicles in the future. As noted, there are two owners of the subject properties. One is the registered owner of 867 Goldstream and one is the registered owner of the remaining three properties. As there are no proposed development plans at this time and the timelines of the two different owners may not be the same, Council may wish to allow the option of the site being development in two phases. If deemed appropriate, Council may wish to require that at least the three properties owned by 671455 BC Ltd. (845, 847, and 849 Goldstream) are consolidated prior to issuance of a Development Permit. Should separate developments occur, 867 Goldstream would be limited to commercial use only, as the existing frontage of the property is 28m, whereas the CCP Zone requires a frontage of 37m in order for multi-family uses to be developed. Due to this, the applicant has requested a text amendment to allow this property to fully develop in accordance with the permitted uses of the CCP Zone with a frontage of 28m instead of 37m since the site is 2,660m² (0.7 acres) in size and since the current zone would allow for a multi-residential building. If Council is supportive of this request, they may wish to amend the text of the CCP zone to allow this site to develop as requested. With respect to access from the properties to Goldstream Avenue, Council may wish to require that a reciprocal access easement between the subject properties is registered prior to a Development Permit ensure that no more than one access point is provided. Page 182 of 395 ### Page 183 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 183 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 7 of 14 Table 3: Proposal Data Permitted by C8A and C3 (Current Zones) Permitted by CCP (Proposed Zone) Permitted Uses C8A C3 Ground Storey  Hotel, Restaurant, Retail Store 2nd Storey  Ground storey uses plus Medical Clinic, Office, Daycare 3rd Storey and up  Apartment, Assisted Living  Apartment  Hotel  Office  Restaurant  Retail Store  Auto Repair  Car Wash  Hotel  Office  Shopping Centre Density 2.5 FAR 4.5 FAR 6.0 FAR Height 6-storeys 6-storeys n/a Site Coverage 40% min, 90% max 75% n/a Front Yard Setback 2.0m (6.6 ft) 7.5m (24.6 ft) 2.0m (6.6 ft) 1-2 storeys 4.0m (13 ft) 3+ storeys Interior Side Yard Setback 6.0m (20 ft) where abutting land designated Residential or Multi- Residential in the OCP 6.0m (20 ft) where abutting land zoned Residential or Multi- Residential 3.0 (9.8 ft) Exterior Side Yard Setback 2.0m (6.6 ft) 7.5m (24.6 ft) 2.0m (6.6 ft) 1-2 storeys 4.0m (13 ft) 3+ storeys Rear Yard Setback 7.5m (24.6 ft) 3.0 or 6.0m where abutting land zoned Residential or Multi-Residential 3.0 (9.8 ft) Parking 1.25 per 0-2 bedrooms 2.25 per 3 + bedrooms 1 per 30m² of commercial GFA 1 per 30m² of GFA 1.25 per 0-2 bedrooms 2.25 per 3 + bedrooms 1 per 30m² of commercial GFA Page 183 of 395 ### Page 184 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 184 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 8 of 14 FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS Goldstream Avenue Typically, the applicant would be required to provide full frontage improvements in accordance with Bylaw 1000 prior to issuance of a building permit. However, the frontage improvements at this location have already been completed with brick paver sidewalks, street trees, parking scallops, and street lighting. The removal or relocation of driveways and remediation of any damaged works is all that is anticipated, but full improvements would be assessed at the time of building permit. There may also be a need to remove the existing median fronting this site in order to provide additional queue length in the centre turning lane. If this is required, it would be the developer’s responsibility to complete these works prior to issuance of a building permit. TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT A brief Traffic Impact Assessment memo is requested prior to Public Hearing to determine what the potential density difference is between the existing and proposed zones to see if there would be any impacts to the signal-timing and/or laning at the intersection of Goldstream at Jacklin. If any improvements are warranted, these would be the responsibility of the developer prior to issuance of a building permit. SEWERS A sewer main does exist within Goldstream Avenue fronting this site, and connections from any future buildings to the main would be required. Any improvements, extensions, or modifications needed to the sewer main within the municipal road right-of-way will be completed by West Shore Environmental Services at the applicant’s expense. DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT This site is located within an area where stormwater infiltration is required as per Bylaw 1000. Stormwater mains do not exist within this region of Langford. As a condition of rezoning, Council may wish to request the applicant to examine how stormwater can be managed on-site through infiltration and have a technical memo from a qualified engineer be provided in this regard to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering prior to public hearing. A full stormwater management plan will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS Rezoning the subject properties to permit higher density of development will increase the assessed value of lands and eventually will increase municipal revenue due to the number of units created. As the Page 184 of 395 ### Page 185 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 185 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 9 of 14 developer is required to complete all frontage improvements, the direct capital costs to the City associated with this development will be negligible. A summary of Amenity Contributions rates and Development Cost Charges that the developer will be expected to pay, is outlined in Tables 4 and 5 below. The amenity contributions that apply as per Council’s current Affordable Housing, Park and Amenity Contribution Policy are summarized in Table 4 below. Table 4: Amenity Contributions per Council Policy Amenity Item Contribution Rates* Total Affordable Housing Reserve Fund $750.00 per unit (residential) TBD General Amenity Reserve Fund $2,850.00 per unit (residential) TBD $10.75 per m² (commercial) TBD * Note: The applicant will be charged for new units created at the time of building permit issuance and is entitled to a 50% or 75% reduction depending on the use and height for units above the 4th storey. DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES The current Development Cost Charges that would apply to this development are summarized in Table 5 below. Note, these are subject to change and DCC’s of the day will be applied at the time of a building permit. Table 5: Development Cost Charges Development Cost Charge Contribution Rates Total Roads $3,092.39 per unit (residential) TBD $54.12 per m² GFA (commercial) TBD Park Improvement $1,890.00 per unit (residential) TBD Park Acquisition $1,100.00 per unit (residential) TBD ISIF Fees $331.65 per unit (residential) TBD $0.14 per ft² GFA (commercial) TBD CRD Water $1,644.00 per unit (residential) TBD $10.74 per m² GFA (commercial) TBD School Site Acquisition $600.00 (residential) TBD Page 185 of 395 ### Page 186 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 186 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 10 of 14 OPTIONS: Option 1 THAT the Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee recommend that Council: 1. Proceed with consideration of 1st reading of Bylaw No. 2079 to amend the zoning designation of the properties located at 845, 847, 849, and 867 Goldstream Avenue from the Community Town Centre Pedestrian A (C8A) Zone and the District Commercial (C3) Zone to the City Centre Pedestrian (CCP) Zone subject to the following terms and conditions: a) That the applicant provides, as a bonus for increased density, the following contributions per residential unit, prior to issuance of a building permit: i. $750 towards the Affordable Housing Fund; and ii. $2,850 towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund. subject to reductions in accordance with the Affordable Housing and Amenity Contribution Policy depending on use and height. b) That the applicant provides, as a bonus for increased density, the following contributions per square meter of commercial space, prior to issuance of a building permit: i. $10.75 towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund. c) That the applicant provides, prior to Public Hearing, the following to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering: i. A technical memo from a qualified engineer that verifies stormwater can be adequately managed on-site for future development. ii. A Traffic Impact Assessment memo that examines the density differences between the existing and proposed zones to determine whether or not any improvements are warranted to the Goldstream Avenue and Jacklin Road intersection. iii. A memo prepared by a Landscape Architect that examines existing trees on site and in the frontage and provides comment on the potential for tree retention as part of the development plan, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning; d) That the applicant provides, prior to Bylaw Adoption, a Section 219 covenant, registered in priority of all other charges on title, that agrees to the following: i. That the three properties at 845, 847, and 849 Goldstream Avenue be consolidated prior to issuance of a Development Permit for Form and Character; Page 186 of 395 ### Page 187 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 187 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 11 of 14 ii. That a reciprocal access easement be registered between the two future properties prior to issuance of a Development Permit for Form and Character; iii. That a minimum of 5% of the land be dedicated to the City or secured for public use by Statutory Right-of-Way, and be constructed as a public amenity such as a plaza, landscaped seating area, or other similar amenity, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning. The land shall be provided or secured prior to issuance of a building permit and the design approved as part of the required Development Permit; iv. That the following are implemented to Bylaw 1000 standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Frontage improvements, including mitigating options from the approved Traffic Impact Assessment; 2. A storm water management plan; and 3. A construction parking management plan. v. That the developer will connect and be responsible for any upgrades required to the services and utilities required for the development; vi. That the building be strata titled into individual residential units prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, to the satisfaction of the Approving Officer; vii. That a separate covenant be registered prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed residential building(s) that ensures parking is allocated to each unit and visitors as required by the zoning bylaw and is not provided in exchange for compensation separate from that of a residential unit; viii. That 100% of residential parking spaces, excluding visitor parking spaces, shall include conduits capable of providing wiring for Level 2 Electric Vehicle charging in the future; and 1. All conduits must be connected to electrical rooms; 2. Where an electric vehicle energy management system (“EVMS”) is provided all communications equipment, control systems, and other devices required to operate the EVMS shall be installed; and 3. All conduits shall be labelled for the use of electric vehicle charging; and 4. The owner must construct the EV charging system in accordance with a plan approved by the City, repair and maintain and otherwise keep the EV charging system in operation, and not do anything that would prevent a strata owner, occupant, or tenant from installing the EV charging equipment. Page 187 of 395 ### Page 188 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 188 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 12 of 14 2. Proceed with consideration of 1st reading of Bylaw No. 2079 to amend the text of the CCP Zone to allow 867 Goldstream Avenue all the permitted uses of the CCP Zone with 28m of frontage. OR Option 2 THAT that Planning, Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee recommend that Council: 1. Take no action at this time with respect to this application to rezone 845-867 Goldstream Avenue. SUBMITTED BY: Robert Dykstra, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Concurrence: Leah Stohmann, MCIP, RPP Deputy Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Donna Petrie, Manager of Business Development and Events Concurrence: Will Ying-udomrat, Manager of Legislative Services Concurrence: Matthew Baldwin, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Michelle Mahovlich, P.Eng, P.Geo, Director of Engineering and Public Works Concurrence: Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance Concurrence: Marie Watmough, Acting Director of Corporate Services Concurrence: Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer Page 188 of 395 ### Page 189 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 189 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 13 of 14 Appendix A SUBJECT PROPERTIES MAP Page 189 of 395 ### Page 190 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 190 Z22-0015 – 845-867 Goldstream Rezoning 20220530 Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee Page 14 of 14 Appendix B LOCATION MAP Page 190 of 395 ### Page 191 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 191 CITY OF LANGFORD BYLAW NO. 2079 A BYLAW TO AMEND BYLAW NO. 300, “LANGFORD ZONING BYLAW, 1999" The Council of the City of Langford, in open meeting assembled, hereby enacts as follows: A. Langford Zoning Bylaw No. 300, 1999 is amended as follows: 1. By deleting from the Community Town Centre Pedestrian A (C8A) Zone and the District Commercial (C3) Zone and adding to the City Centre Pedestrian (CCP) Zone the properties legally described as: · Lot A, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan VIP64401, PID No. 023-614-340 (845 Goldstream Avenue); · Lot B, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan VIP64401, PID No. 023-614-358 (847 Goldstream Avenue); · Lot 2, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan 17987, PID No. 003-855-333 (849 Goldstream Avenue); and · Lot B, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan 24248, PID No. 002-992-698 (867 Goldstream Avenue); as shown shaded in Schedule A, attached to and forming part of this Bylaw. 2. By adding to the CCP Zone map Schedule ‘R’ those portions of lands identified as ‘Area 2’ in Schedule B, attached to and forming part of this Bylaw. 3. By adding as Section 6.58.03(4) the following text: “Despite Article 6.58.03(3), the frontage of the lot legally described as Lot B, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan 24248 (867 Goldstream Avenue) may have frontage of 28 m (92 ft). (Bylaw 2079)” 4. By adding the following to Table 1 of Schedule AD: Zone Bylaw No. Legal Description Amenity Contributions Eligible for Reduction in Section 2 of Schedule AD CCP 2079 · Lot A, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan VIP64401, PID No. 023-614-340 (845 Goldstream Avenue); a) $2,850 per new residential unit created on the 1st to 4th storeys of the building towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund; No Page 191 of 395 ### Page 192 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 192 Bylaw No. 2079 Page 2 of 5 · Lot B, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan VIP64401, PID No. 023-614-358 (847 Goldstream Avenue); · Lot 2, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan 17987, PID No. 003-855-333 (849 Goldstream Avenue); and · Lot B, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan 24248, PID No. 002-992-698 (867 Goldstream Avenue) b) $1,425 per new residential unit created on the 5th and 6th storeys of the building towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund; c) $712.50 per new residential unit created on the 7th storey or higher of the building towards the General Amenity Reserve Fund; d) $750 per new residential unit created on the 1st to 4th storeys of the building towards the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund; e) $375 per new residential unit created on the 5th and 6th storeys of the building towards the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund; f) $187.50 per new residential unit created on the 7thstorey or higher of the building towards the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund; and g) $10.75 per square metre of commercial space created towards to the General Amenity Reserve Fund. Page 192 of 395 ### Page 193 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 193 Bylaw No. 2079 Page 3 of 5 B. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 677, (845, 847, 849, 867 Goldstream Avenue), Bylaw No. 2079, 2022". READ A FIRST TIME this day of , 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held this day of , 2022. READ A SECOND TIME this day of , 2022. READ A THIRD TIME this day of , 2022. APPROVED BY THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE this day of , 2022. ADOPTED this day of , 2022. PRESIDING COUNCIL MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Page 193 of 395 ### Page 194 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 194 Bylaw No. 2079 Page 4 of 5 Schedule A Page 194 of 395 ### Page 195 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 195 Bylaw No. 2079 Page 5 of 5 Schedule B Page 195 of 395 ### Page 196 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 196 Z22-0015 845, 847, 849 & 867 Goldstream Ave. PZAH May 30th, 2022 REZONING PROPOSAL FOR THE CITY CENTRE PEDESTRIAN ZONE (CCP) 1 Page 196 of 395 ### Page 197 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 197 The Proposal – CCP Zone To rezone from the existing C3 AND C8A Commercial Zones to the City Centre Pedestrian Zone (CCP) Allowable Floor Space Ratio (FSR) is 6.0:1. Retail Commercial uses at ground floor level, office use at the second floor. No parking or other variances are required at this time No building height declared at this time 2 Page 197 of 395 ### Page 198 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 198 Official Community Plan Compliance Official Community Plan compliant for the City Centre Designation Development Permit for Form and Character required. This permit ensures compliance with design guidelines for the City Centre including landscaping, signage and other features. Suites will be available for the Attainable Housing Program 3 Page 198 of 395 ### Page 199 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 199 CCP Zone – Permitted Uses 4 Ground Floor: Active uses that include Hotel, Fitness Studios, Libraries, Licensed Premises, Liquor Store, Personal Services, Entertainment, and Retail. Second Floor: Catering, Charities, Daycare, Medical, Offices, Places of Worship, Preschools, Training and Education. Third Storey and above: Apartment, Seniors and Assisted Living. Floor Space Ratio up to 6:1, with amenity fees, and common outdoor amenity space provided. Parking in accordance with Bylaw 300 for the City Centre area. Page 199 of 395 ### Page 200 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 200 Access to Cycling and Transit Excellent location for commuter cycling at the E&N Rail trail Near potential light rial Located on the #50 Bus Route 5 Page 200 of 395 ### Page 201 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 201 Access to Parks and Amenities 6 Page 201 of 395 ### Page 202 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 202 Existing Conditions 7 The properties are currently occupied by the one storey Maxxam Insurance building, a two storey mixed commercial building and the Tim Hortons coffee shop and Drive Thru Page 202 of 395 ### Page 203 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 203 Options for the Properties 8 There are no immediate plans to develop these properties. The Tim Hortons lease expires in 7 years, at which time re-development will be considered. The properties are for sale and will likely be redeveloped by the new owners. The proposal is coming forward now to align the current commercial zone with the Official Community Plan for the City Centre area. Any new proposal will have to conform to the Guidelines for the City Centre Pedestrian Area 1. Site access is expected to be shared with reciprocal easements between properties. Page 203 of 395 ### Page 204 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 204 Neighbourhood Consultation Letters were sent to the immediate condominium buildings though the strata managers. Notices were hand delivered to the Hockley mobile home park to the south. If any neighbour feels that they were missed, or requires additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at gcpermits2020@gmail.com. 9 Page 204 of 395 ### Page 205 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 205 City Centre The properties lie within the heart of the City Centre Pedestrian - Area 1, which requires mandatory two storeys of commercial use, with active businesses (retail, restaurant) on the ground floor. 10 Page 205 of 395 ### Page 206 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 206 City Centre Development Permit Area 11 Page 206 of 395 ### Page 207 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 207 City Centre Neighbourhoods 12 Ensure development in and around centres supports a nodal pattern of development; Encourage the growth of business activities and employment opportunities to support the walkability of city centre neighbourhoods; Enhance the vitality of the downtown core through high quality design and incorporation of pedestrian-oriented uses at street level; Preserve and increase the stock of safe and affordable housing; Support residents in moving through the stages of the housing continuum and facilitating the delivery of a range of housing types along the continuum; and Pursue ‘aging in place’ and accessibility strategies for housing. Page 207 of 395 ### Page 208 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 208 City Centre Development Permit Area 13 Page 208 of 395 ### Page 209 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 209 Building Types 14 Ensure accessibility is considered for planning and design of buildings, the public realm and public parks; Ensure flexibility and ability to adapt to future changes; and Promote design individuality within a consistent pattern through the community. To have apartment buildings contribute to the housing density and visual appearance of the City Centre. To create symbiotic relationships between commercial and residential applications within the same development. To integrate solely retail establishments (large and small) into the urban pattern of the City Centre. To promote the integration of stand-alone office structures into City Centre urban design. Page 209 of 395 ### Page 210 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 210 Urban Environment 15 Create livable streets through scale, form, building orientation and character elements; Ensure accessibility is considered for planning and design of buildings, the public realm and public parks; and Promote a greater sense of place that celebrates our community’s unique setting and people. Incorporate ground level public gathering space as well as private amenity spaces. Urban landscape, street trees and roof top gardens possible. Page 210 of 395 ### Page 211 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 211 Form and Character 16 Create livable streets through scale, form, building orientation and character elements; Promote a greater sense of place that celebrates our community’s unique setting and people; Encourage energy efficiency and green building development for new buildings; and Ensure flexibility and ability to adapt to future changes. Orientation and Massing Façade Features Building Entry and Access Roofscapes Materials Colours Page 211 of 395 ### Page 212 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 212 Z22-0015 845, 847, 849 & 867 Goldstream Ave. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME 17 Page 212 of 395 ### Page 213 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 213 Page 1 of 1 t 250.478.7882 e administration@langford.ca 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, BC V9B 2X8 Staff Report to Council DATE: Monday, June 6, 2022 DEPARTMENT: Finance SUBJECT: 2021 Statement of Financial Information (SOFI) COMMENTARY: Each year, pursuant to the Financial Information Act, the City must produce the Statement of Financial Information (SOFI) and Council must approve the report. Staff have prepared the 2021 SOFI for Council’s review and approval. These reports must be made available as a package each year and one copy sent to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs. OPTIONS: Option 1 THAT Council approve the 2021 Statement of Financial Information. OR Option 2 THAT Council not approve the 2021 Statement of Financial Information. SUBMITTED BY: Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance Concurrence: Donna Petrie, Manager of Business Development and Events Concurrence: Will Ying-udomrat, Manager of Legislative Services Concurrence: Matthew Baldwin, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Michelle Mahovlich, P.Eng, P.Geo, Director of Engineering and Public Works Concurrence: Marie Watmough, Acting Director of Corporate Services Concurrence: Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer Page 213 of 395 ### Page 214 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 214 CITY OF LANGFORD Statement of Financial Information (Pursuant to the Financial Information Act) City of Langford, British Columbia, Canada 2021 Page 214 of 395 ### Page 215 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 215 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Table of Contents Statement of Financial Information Approval 1 Schedule of Debts 2 Unaudited Schedules Schedule of Guarantee and Indemnity Agreements 3 Schedule of Grants or Contributions 3 Schedule of Council Remuneration and Expenses 4 Schedule of Employee Remuneration and Expenses 5 ‐ 7 Statement of Severance Agreements 8 Schedule of Payments to Suppliers for Provision of Goods and Services 9 ‐ 14 Audited Financial Statements (Includes Financial Reporting Responsibility) Page 215 of 395 ### Page 216 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 216 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Statement of Financial Information Approval Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA Director of Finance Matt Sahlstrom Councillor Chair, Administration and Finance Committee The undersigned, as authorized by the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Subsection 9(2), approves  all the statements and schedules included in this Statement of Financial Information, produced under the  Financial Information Act. 1 Page 216 of 395 ### Page 217 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 217 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Debts Information on all long term debts for this organization is included in Note 5 to the 2021 Audited Financial  Statements. 2 Page 217 of 395 ### Page 218 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 218 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Guarantee and Indemnity Agreements Schedule of Grants or Contributions There are no Financial Guarantee and Indemnity Agreements in place which required government  approval prior to being given under the Financial Administration Act. The City of Langford does not consider grant‐in‐aid applications. 3 Page 218 of 395 ### Page 219 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 219 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Council Remuneration and Expenses For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 Elected Officials Remuneration Expenses Blackwell, Denise  Councillor 28,312.90             ‐                         Sahlstrom, Matt  Councillor 28,668.22             ‐                         Seaton, Lanny Councillor 28,312.90             ‐                         Stewart, Norma  Councillor 33,129.46             ‐                         Szpak, Lillian  Councillor 28,312.90             ‐                         Wade, Roger  Councillor 33,410.02             ‐                         Young, Stewart  Mayor 78,614.95             ‐                         Total 258,761.35          ‐                         4 Page 219 of 395 ### Page 220 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 220 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Employee Remuneration and Expenses For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 Employee Name Job Title Remuneration  Expenses Adams, Steve Fire Captain 126,271.95 799.00          Agland, Brian Systems Administrator 87,435.71 188.91          Arnold, Graham Firefighter 102,246.43 ‐                Aubrey, Christopher Fire Chief 158,179.31 638.88          Auterhoff, Nicci Manager of Police Services 90,952.18 ‐                Baldwin, Matthew Director of Planning 168,698.50 1,076.96      Bate, Mitchell GIS Technologist 81,053.47 ‐                Bell, Brian Fire Captain 128,639.17 ‐                Booth, Travis GIS Technologist 81,024.00 281.88          Buckingham, Julia Planner II 80,585.82 528.94          Caven, Lance Assistant Fire Chief 142,687.13 920.19          Chadwick, Simon Fire Captain 133,417.86 399.99          Chapman, Conrad Firefighter 78,695.75 ‐                Corpus, Ted Senior Application Developer/Analyst 97,144.87 ‐                Cuckovich, Nicholas Firefighter 77,545.04 ‐                Davidson, Scott Deputy Fire Chief 155,977.02 255.00          Dillabaugh, Mike Director of Finance 152,905.01 1,917.00      Dube, Kevin Manager of Information Technology & GIS 123,676.59 1,200.00      Duncan, Ashley Fire Communications Operator  84,558.17 ‐                Dykstra, Robert Senior Planner 95,781.01 568.77          Edwards, Cam Senior Building Inspector 97,333.10 641.53          Egli, Garrett Firefighter 78,170.89 ‐                Fisher , Matthew Firefighter 89,152.40 144.00          Fletcher, Lorne Manager of Comm. Safety & Municipal Enforcement 115,085.61 133.75          Gillich, Rob Systems Administrator 77,265.07 285.06          Goodwin, Seth Firefighter 94,423.11 144.00          Henshall, George Deputy Director of Engineering and Public Works 131,811.48 2,985.08      Higgins, Delayne Senior Engineering Technologist 84,974.75 1,075.00      Howden, Howard Firefighter 86,775.59 144.00          Humphrys, Kat  Communications Operator 107,416.58 ‐                Hutchins, Braden Director of Corporate Services 138,698.80 267.00          Kay, Kyla Senior Engineering Technologist 78,345.73 2,178.75      Kiedyk, Darren Chief Administrative Officer 211,526.90 1,717.00      Kryklywyj, Audrey Deputy Director of Finance 123,636.64 1,650.00      Lambert, Paul Senior Bylaw Enforcement Officer 91,373.77 808.75          Lenton, David Senior Engineering Technologist 83,013.89 380.00          Leung, Ivan Manager of Engineering Construction 119,198.63 3,068.49      Lowe, Cate IT Support Specialist 75,282.75 110.63          Mahovlich, Michelle Director of Engineering and Public Works 159,770.13 1,874.90      McLellan, Tara Parks and Landscape Technician 77,122.13 ‐                5 Page 220 of 395 ### Page 221 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 221 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Employee Remuneration and Expenses (continued) Employee Name Job Title Remuneration  Expenses Miller, Shawn GIS Technologist 80,952.24 281.88          Minifie, Daryl Senior Land Development Technologist 88,176.47 380.00          Moen, Jeffrey GIS Technologist 80,952.25 ‐                Moreau, Richard RCMP ‐ IT/IM Analyst/LAN Administrator 81,570.75 ‐                Moss, Leanna Communications Operator 95,692.32 ‐                Nielsen, Yari Manager of Parks & Recreation 102,617.71 6,340.89      Obersteller, Paul Firefighter 126,293.21 514.99          Oliver, James Senior Land Development Technologist 88,193.14 ‐                Petrie, Donna Manager of Business Development and Events 115,979.07 1,413.18      Pighin, Darryl Firefighter 78,542.13 ‐                Pinnock, Joanne Communications Operator 103,833.54 ‐                Pozney, Chris Building Inspector III 96,440.48 1,731.53      Robinson, Wayne Building Inspector III 98,775.77 1,602.78      Sametz, David Planner II ‐ Long Range Planning 79,362.19 1,588.77      Spencer, Chris Firefighter 99,005.86 1,092.33      Staniforth, Curtis Financial Analyst 75,486.45 2,597.73      Stohmann, Leah Deputy Director of Planning 129,519.61 902.72          Watmough, Marie Acting Director of Corporate Services 128,546.32 3,398.81      Worobec, Jerry Manager of Building 118,677.83 641.53          Yeo, Derek Bylaw Officer 77,552.34 4,045.64      Total over $75,000 6,314,022.62       52,916.24    Total under $75,000 4,847,906.63       Total Remuneration 11,161,929.25    Notes to the reader: Remuneration includes all forms of salary, wages, and taxable benefits paid to an employee during the year.  Remuneration can differ from total salary because while an employee may earn wages, those wages may not be paid until a different financial period. Employee expenses defined in the Financial Information Regulation includes travel expenses, memberships, tuition, relocation, vehicle leases, extraordinary hiring expenses, and registration fees and similar amounts which has not been included in the definition of remuneration. 6 Page 221 of 395 ### Page 222 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 222 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Employee Remuneration and Expenses (continued) Statement of Reconciliation to Financial Statements Disclosure: The remuneration schedule is prepared on a cash paid basis for employee related compensation; the Financial  Statements are prepared on an accrual accounting basis, and include employer related costs for employment  agreements and payroll related obligations. 7 Page 222 of 395 ### Page 223 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 223 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Statement of Severance Agreements: For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 There were three severance agreements under which payment commenced between The City of Langford  and its non‐unionized employees during the fiscal year 2021.  These agreements represented from two  weeks to eleven months of compensation.  8 Page 223 of 395 ### Page 224 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 224 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Payments to Suppliers for Provision of Goods and Services For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 Supplier Name Amount Paid 0676955 BC Ltd                                                     100,000.00             0939916 BC Ltd                                                    51,625.00               945 Developments LP                                               67,725.00               Accent Refrigeration 63,000.00               Achinback Industries And Foundry Ltd                              30,611.59               ACO Systems Ltd                                                   65,495.01               Advanced Subsea Services Ltd                                      159,920.25             Allied Power and Communication Ltd.                               198,690.25             Allman Dirtworks                                                  25,325.11               Allterra Construction Ltd                                         961,511.38             Anniko Hunter Law Corp in Trust       275,000.00             Arngask Developments                                              43,236.00               ASO/Desjardin 568,210.60             Associated Engineering Ltd                                        327,775.87             BC Assessment Authority                                           623,404.87             BC Hydro                                                          1,320,684.12         BC Hydro Payment Controls Dept                                    65,833.23               BC Transit                                                        3,336,449.23         BD Hall Constructors                                              73,159.85               Beecher Bay First Nation                                          47,187.33               Bell Mobility Inc.                                                66,606.11               Black Press Group                                                 129,733.34             Bola Contracting                                                  94,101.32               Bricklok Surfacing & Landscape Supply Ltd                         163,038.54             Bunt & Associates Engineering Ltd.                                26,895.75               Camosun Properties Ltd. 85,015.00               Capital City Paving Ltd.                                          1,053,439.63         Capital Region Emerg.Serv.Telecom(CREST)                          110,114.54             Capital Regional District                                         10,919,628.40       Capital Regional District Water ‐Isld Hwy                         996,870.48             Capital Regional District Water‐Fisgard                           275,843.33             Capital Regional District‐Bylaw/Animal Control                    259,947.70             Capital Regional Hospital District                                2,616,983.37         CDW Canada Corp.                                                  188,833.20             CentralSquare Canada Software Inc                                 44,075.76               Chrissy Shaw                                                      37,147.64               Citta Construction Ltd                                            30,939.16               City of Colwood                                                   132,294.17             Clark Wilson LLP                                                  149,468.00             Colliers Project Leaders Inc                                      59,850.00               9 Page 224 of 395 ### Page 225 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 225 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Payments to Suppliers for Provision of Goods and Services (continued) Supplier Name Amount Paid Commercial Lighting Products                                      28,157.20               Copcan Civil Ltd                                                  46,958.22               Cottyn Development Ltd.                                           97,150.00               CRD Bylaw Enforcement                                             81,533.34               DB Services of Victoria Inc                                       279,725.38             Dekra‐Lite Industries Inc.                                        58,189.95               Devon Properties Ltd.                                             45,060.48               Draycor Construction Ltd                                          789,988.53             Eager Beaver Tree Service                                         291,826.50             Eclipse Creative Inc.                                             160,331.16             Ecoasis Resort and Golf LLP                                       458,612.07             Enex Fuels Ltd                                                    52,079.25               Era Law in Trust  731,993.24             Esquimalt, Township Of                                            96,878.43               Esri Canada                                                       126,909.66             Fantastic Cleaning Ltd.                                           77,788.28               Fastrac Printing Ltd                                              35,815.34               Fortis BC Natural Gas                                             86,193.55               G & E Contracting LP                                              873,020.76             Galaxy Motors                                                     32,100.00               GFL Environmental Inc                                             37,088.93               Ghotra Excavating & Trucking Ltd                                  103,726.00             Glenoak Ford                                                      35,249.78               Goldstream Holdings Ltd Partnership                               27,692.30               Golf Canada Foundation                                            50,000.00               Graphic Office Interiors 63,406.65               Greater Victoria Public Library                                   2,094,982.90         Greater Victoria Security                                         374,940.58             Gwaii Engineering Ltd                                             31,724.97               H L Demolition & Waste Management Ltd                             49,591.50               Habitat Systems Inc.                                              214,292.48             Harris Computer Corp                                              38,655.83               Hazelwood Construction Services                                   1,830,257.48         Highstreet Sky Gate (2020) LIM                                    359,922.00             Holland Avenue Nursery Ltd                                        25,625.60               Houston Sign 90 Ltd                                               38,797.50               HSM Insurance                                                     458,847.00             Iconix Waterworks LP                                              164,176.94             Insurance Corporation Of BC                                       43,471.00               International Association of Firefighters                               55,630.73               Ironclad Developments Inc.                                        1,058,086.20         10 Page 225 of 395 ### Page 226 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 226 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Payments to Suppliers for Provision of Goods and Services (continued) Supplier Name Amount Paid Island Key Computer Ltd.                                          37,159.36               IWC Excavation Ltd.                                               141,579.59             Jacklin Property Ltd                                              43,941.08               Jawl Bundon LLP in Trust 1,000,000.00         JDparks                                                           74,200.40               K. Wilson Contracting Ltd                                         158,031.03             Kashyap, Mukesh                                                   27,201.58               Kerr Wood Leidal Consulting Engineers                             200,656.03             KPMG LLP, T4348                                                   37,275.00               Kroppmanns, Rebecca                                               326,563.33             KWJ Enterprises Inc                                               213,885.73             Ladkeen Canada Ltd                                                50,280.00               Langford Lanes Bowling Alley Inc.  2,833,432.22         Langford Volunteer Firefighters Assoc.                            119,925.00             Le Gers Properties Inc.                                           141,857.02             Liberty Ridge Homes Inc                                           814,795.00             Limona Construction Ltd.                                          263,840.90             Lumca Inc.                                                        468,526.80             Maglin                                                            25,157.73               M'akola Housing Society                                           520,577.15             MasterCard 318,813.44             Mazzei Electric                                                   37,523.37               McCormick Meadows Ltd                                             99,522.50               McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd                                306,611.29             Metchosin, District Of                                            37,731.14               Microsoft Corporation                                             140,863.48             Milestone Equipment Contracting Inc                               3,181,759.11         Modo Co‐Operative                                                 154,582.62             Motion Canada                                                     62,378.67               Musco Sports Lighting, LLC                                        741,440.00             Nederman Canada Ltd.                                              27,006.31               Nick Bray Architecture                                            32,577.89               Northridge Excavating Ltd                                         124,325.98             Oakcrest Park Estates Ltd.                                        846,172.20             Ocean Pipe                                                        116,008.45             OnPoint Project Engineers Ltd                                     95,594.15               Pacific Centre Family Services                                    150,000.00             Pacific East Developments Ltd                                     39,780.00               Pacific FC Sports Inc.                                            40,240.96               Pacific Football Club                                             57,802.63               PAW Pacific Audio Works Ltd                                       30,800.38               11 Page 226 of 395 ### Page 227 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 227 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Payments to Suppliers for Provision of Goods and Services (continued) Supplier Name Amount Paid PBX Engineering Ltd                                               26,423.79               Performance Plus Hockey inc.                                      1,228,073.96         Pioneer Manufacturing Company                                     35,146.81               Powell & Associates Land Surveyors                                25,510.73               Proscenium Architecture & Interiors Inc.                          29,588.83               Protex Fence Services                                             319,543.98             Puttonen, Melanie                                                 95,380.75               Randall & Murrell in Trust 45,000.00               Raylec Power LP                                                   440,315.73             Receiver General for Canada ‐ Source Deductions 3,359,375.52         Receiver General ‐RCMP contract                                   8,809,244.42         Richmond Property Group                                           90,548.82               Riptide Studios Inc.                                              43,923.01               Rocky Mountain Phoenix                                            25,731.09               Rugby Canada                                                      47,000.00               Ryzuk Geotechnical                                                36,415.61               Scansa Construction                                               786,672.21             School District  No.62                                            1,462,615.26         School Tax 23,278,297.96       Scho's Line Painting Service                                      38,563.56               Seacliff Properties (Langford) Ltd                                1,179,322.91         Shaw Business Solutions Inc                                       25,444.76               Sheen Design Ltd                                                  54,665.01               Sign Pad, The                                                     147,141.19             Silverstream Investments Inc                                      103,730.52             Sooke, District Of                                                76,548.07               Southern Vancouver Island Nature Trails Society                   46,120.91               Sowden, Rockell                                                   136,316.22             Spencer Heights Inc                                               257,556.00             SSL‐Sustainable Services Ltd                                      145,164.21             Stanborough, Maria                                                25,942.89               Suburban Motors                                                   50,151.36               Superannuation 1,915,787.79         Superior City Contracting Services Ltd                            295,534.05             Surespan Bridge Rental Ltd                                        43,792.00               Tarkett Sports Canada Inc.                                        217,320.90             TerraWest Environmental Inc                                       39,252.69               The Good Party                                                    42,113.84               Tiger Fera Investment Inc                                         36,000.00               TL Housing Solutions Ltd                                          154,366.10             Top Shelf Productions Inc                                         81,446.63               12 Page 227 of 395 ### Page 228 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 228 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Payments to Suppliers for Provision of Goods and Services (continued) Supplier Name Amount Paid Tran Sign 2019 Ltd.                                               25,451.42               Tri City Finishing                                                86,510.55               Triway Seniors Housing Ltd                                        226,370.00             Tri‐X Excavating Ltd.                                             101,622.93             Tri‐X Timber Corporation                                          109,945.86             Van Isle Bricklock Surfacing & Landscape                          105,402.36             Verity Construction Ltd                                           528,587.52             Victoria Contracting & Municipal Maintenance Corp.            6,554,168.74         Victoria Shipping Containers                                      49,997.92               Victoria Single Horse Drawn Carriage Tours Inc.                   30,175.25               Vimex Contracting Ltd                                             626,607.76             WA Architects Ltd.                                                47,902.60               Wang, Zheng                                                       33,241.44               Watters, Brian                                                    55,205.31               West Shore Arts Council                                           34,113.75               West Shore Environmental Services Limited Partnership      764,375.21             West Shore Parks & Recreation Society.                            3,438,588.00         Westbrook Consulting Ltd.                                         29,078.58               Westhills Land Corp                                               243,615.00             Westhills Land Corp‐Library Rent                                  156,377.03             Wheelhouse Cycling Society                                        25,000.00               Woodsmere Holding Corp                                            109,725.00             Workhorse Trail Design                                            139,440.83             Worksafe BC 178,969.44             WSP Canada Inc                                                    70,449.40               Yan, Mei Hua                                                      130,407.63             YMCA YWCA of Greater Victoria                                     1,047,499.96         Young Anderson in Trust 5,225,401.07         Young Anderson Barristers & Solicitors                           409,081.92             Total over $25,000 117,472,969.93     Total under $25,000 3,252,819.68         Total 120,725,789.61    13 Page 228 of 395 ### Page 229 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 229 City of Langford Statement of Financial Information Schedule of Payments to Suppliers for Provision of Goods and Services (continued) Reconciliation of Payments for Goods and Services to Financial Statements: The Schedule of Payments to Suppliers for the Provision of Goods and Services has been prepared on a cash  basis whereas the financial statements have been prepared on an accrual accounting basis, therefore no  reconciliation of this schedule with the financial statements has been prepared.  Included in the above payments are taxes collected for and paid to other governments and agencies, refunds of  deposits, and payroll and other statutory obligations. 14 Page 229 of 395 ### Page 230 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 230 CITY OF LANGFORD Consolidated Financial Statements For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 City of Langford, British Columbia, Canada 2021 Page 230 of 395 ### Page 231 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 231 Mayor: Stewart Young Councillors: Denise Blackwell Matt Sahlstrom Lanny Seaton Norma Stewart Lillian Szpak Roger Wade Chief Administrative Officer: Darren Kiedyk, CPA, CGA Director of Finance: Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA City Engineer: Michelle Mahovlich, M.Eng., P.Geo., P.Eng. City Planner: Matthew Baldwin, MCIP, RPP Fire Chief: Christopher Aubrey Auditors: KPMG Solicitors: Young Anderson Bankers: Bank of Montreal Police: RCMP ‐ West Shore Page 231 of 395 ### Page 232 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 232 CITY OF LANGFORD Consolidated Financial Statements Year ended December 31, 2021 Financial Statements Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements 1 Independent Auditors' Report 2 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 5 Consolidated Statement of Operations 6 Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Debt 7 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 8 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 9 Page 232 of 395 ### Page 233 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 233 D rector of Finance Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the City of Langford (the "City") are the responsibility of management and have been prepared in compliance with legislation, and in accordance with Canadian public sector accounting standards for local governments as recommended by the Public Sector Accounting Board of The Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. A summary of the significant accounting policies are described in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The preparation of financial statements necessarily involves the use of estimates based on management's judgment, particularly when transactions affecting the current accounting period cannot be finalized with certainty until future periods. The City's management maintains a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, transactions are properly authorized and recorded in compliance with legislative and regulatory requirements, and reliable financial information is available on a timely basis for preparation of the consolidated financial statements. These systems are monitored and evaluated by management. City of Langford Council meets with management and the external auditors to review the consolidated financial statements and discuss any significant financial reporting or internal control matters prior to their approval of the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, independent external auditors appointed by the City. The accompanying Independent Auditors' Report outlines their responsibilities, the scope of their examination and their opinion on the City's consolidated financial statements. 1 Page 233 of 395 ### Page 234 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 234 KPMG LLP St. Andrew’s Square II 800-730 View Street Victoria BC V8W 3Y7 Canada Telephone 250-480-3500 Fax 250-480-3539 KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP. INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT To the Mayor and Councillors of The City of Langford Opinion We have audited the consolidated financial statements of The City of Langford (the “City”), which comprise: • the consolidated statement of financial position as at December 31, 2021 • the consolidated statement of operations for the year then ended • the consolidated statement of changes in net debt for the year then ended • the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended • and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies (hereinafter referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the City as at December 31, 2021 and its consolidated results of operations, its consolidated changes in net financial debt and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Canadian public sector accounting standards. Basis for Opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the “Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements” section of our auditors’ report. We are independent of the City in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in Canada and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Page 234 of 395 ### Page 235 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 235 The City of Langford Page 2 Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with Canadian public sector accounting standards, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the City’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the City or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the City’s financial reporting process. Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. As part of an audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also: • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management. Page 235 of 395 ### Page 236 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 236 The City of Langford Page 3 • Conclude on the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the City's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditors’ report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditors’ report. However, future events or conditions may cause the City to cease to continue as a going concern. • Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation. • Communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit. • Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the City to express an opinion on the financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion. Chartered Professional Accountants Victoria, Canada May 2, 2022 Page 236 of 395 ### Page 237 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 237 CITY OF LANG FORD Consolidated Statement of Financial Position December 31, 2021, with comparative information for 2020 2021 2020 Financial assets: Cash and cash equivalents (note 3) $ 53,531,675 $ 54,580,004 Short term investments 10,253,140 15,138,042 Property taxes receivable 2,144,197 1,048,130 Accounts receivable 14,842,438 10,376,933 Other assets 667,020 634,830 81,438,470 81,777,939 Financial liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 16,554,332 22,795,533 Prepaid property taxes and licences 2,780,327 1,944,850 Deferred revenue (note 4) 15,578,925 20,808,221 Refundable deposits 19,038,083 13,866,337 Debt (note 5) 18,763,889 21,103,809 72,715,556 80,518,750 Net financial assets 8,722,914 1,259,189 Non-financial assets: Tangible capital assets (note 6) 557,865,727 506,019,439 Sewer franchise agreement (note 7) 42,738,465 39,064,234 Prepaid expenses 543,876 569,382 601,148,068 545,653,055 Commitments, contingencies and contractual rights (note 12 and 13) Accumulated surplus (note 8) $ 609,870,982 $ 546,912,244 Th are an integrl part of these consolidated financial statements. 5 Page 237 of 395 ### Page 238 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 238 CITY OF LANGFORD Consolidated Statement of Operations Year ended December 31, 2021, with comparative information for 2020 Financial Plan 2021 2020 (note 14) Revenue:      Taxation, net (note 9) $ 37,768,711        $ 37,782,510       $ 35,177,890            Development cost charges (note 4) 13,750,762        11,130,623       4,419,756              Sewer capital recovery fees ‐                       9,132,514         7,148,962              Utility charges 5,000                   5,000                 5,000                      Other 4,666,242           9,896,416         7,151,795              Licences and permits 3,332,100           5,120,968         4,021,854              Penalties and interest 287,000              493,451            281,422                 Government transfers (note 10) 9,911,441           6,967,768         8,750,632              Commercial leasing 5,185,500           4,905,596         3,921,434              Casino ‐                       759,073            277,283                 Investment earnings 275,000              450,369            606,955                 Developer and property owner contributions 1,694,831           44,875,719       34,645,468       Total revenue 76,876,587        131,520,007    106,408,451    Expenses: General government services:           Legislative 566,595              441,560            547,469                      Administrative 4,739,223           4,600,712         4,295,487                   Other 2,556,194           2,204,297         2,063,369         7,862,012           7,246,569         6,906,325         Protective services:           Police and bylaw enforcement 13,182,623        12,964,349       13,107,352                 Fire protection and emergency response 4,375,473           4,698,811         4,671,062                   Building inspection and other 876,686              907,101            753,449            18,434,782        18,570,261       18,531,863       Engineering and public works:           Common services 1,785,719           1,298,767         1,391,223                   Land development services 493,356              652,859            741,821                      Roads, streets and storm drainage 6,053,494           12,372,986       10,766,075       8,332,569           14,324,612       12,899,119       Community services:           Environmental and development services 1,045,467           1,193,151         1,057,688                   Recreation and cultural services 13,955,896        16,246,672       14,593,329                 West Shore Parks and Recreation Society (note 15) 7,767,137           5,521,721         4,922,120         22,768,500        22,961,544       20,573,137       Utility and enterprise services:           Sewer infrastructure ‐                       5,458,283         4,769,350         Total expenses 57,397,863        68,561,269       63,679,794       Annual surplus 19,478,724        62,958,738       42,728,657       Accumulated surplus, beginning of year 546,912,244      546,912,244    504,183,587    Accumulated surplus, end of year $ 566,390,968      $ 609,870,982    $ 546,912,244    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 6 Page 238 of 395 ### Page 239 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 239 CITY OF LANGFORD Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Financial Assets Year ended December 31, 2021, with comparative information for 2020 Financial Plan 2021 2020 (note 14) Annual surplus $ 19,478,724          $ 62,958,738          $ 42,728,657        Acquisition of tangible capital assets (21,369,993)         (28,582,783)         (13,347,653)       Amortization of tangible capital assets ‐                        10,304,149          9,747,860          Gain on sale of tangible capital assets ‐                        (3,277,008)           (470,545)            Proceeds on sale of tangible capital assets ‐                        6,530,302            3,737,500          Sewer capital recovery fees ‐                        (9,132,514)           (7,148,962)         Sewer capital agency fee ‐                        4,655,362            4,020,753          Developer contributions of tangible capital assets ‐                        (35,560,283)         (29,945,883)       Change in proportionate share of West Shore Parks & Rec Society ‐                        (457,744)              (240,062)            (1,891,269)           7,438,219            9,081,665          Consumption of prepaid expenses ‐                        25,506                  196,416              Change in net financial assets (1,891,269)           7,463,725            9,278,081          Net financial assets (debt), beginning of year 1,259,189            1,259,189            (8,018,892)         Net financial assets, end of year $ (632,080)              $ 8,722,914            $ 1,259,189          The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 7 Page 239 of 395 ### Page 240 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 240 CITY OF LANGFORD Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Year ended December 31, 2021, with comparative information for 2020 2021 2020 Cash provided by (used in): Operating activities:      Annual surplus $ 62,958,738          $ 42,728,657             Items not involving cash:           Amortization of tangible capital assets 10,304,149          9,747,860                    Gain on sale of tangible capital assets (3,277,008)           (470,545)                      Developer contributions of tangible capital assets (35,560,283)         (29,945,883)                 Sewer capital recovery fees (9,132,514)           (7,148,962)                   Sewer capital agency fee 4,655,362            4,020,753                    Change in proportionate share of West Shore Parks & Rec Society (457,744)              (240,062)                 Changes in non‐cash operating assets and liabilities:            Property taxes receivable (1,096,067)           740,801                         Accounts receivable (4,465,505)           2,221,087                     Other assets (32,190)                 (107,044)                       Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (6,241,201)           9,680,067                     Prepaid property taxes and licences 835,477                431,483                         Deferred revenue (5,229,296)           (459,126)                       Refundable deposits 5,171,746            (719,717)                       Prepaid expenses 25,506                  196,416              18,459,170          30,675,785        Capital activities:      Acquisition of tangible capital assets (28,582,783)         (13,347,653)            Proceeds on sale of tangible capital assets 6,530,302            3,737,500          (22,052,481)         (9,610,153)         Financing activities:      Debt payments   (2,339,920)           (2,197,016)              Sale of investments 4,884,902            17,841,740        2,544,982            15,644,724        Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (1,048,329)           36,710,356        Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 54,580,004          17,869,648        Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 53,531,675          $ 54,580,004        Supplemental cash flow information:      Cash paid for interest $ 229,896                $ 463,040                   Cash received from interest 459,577                618,904              The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 8 Page 240 of 395 ### Page 241 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 241 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Year ended December 31, 2021 1. Covid‐19 2. Significant accounting policies: (a) Reporting entity: (b) Basis of accounting: (c) Revenue recognition: (d) Deferred revenue: (e) Refundable deposits: (f) Investment income: The City of Langford (the "City") is incorporated and operates under the provisions of the British  Columbia Local Government Act and the Community Charter  of British Columbia. The consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the City.  The consolidated financial statements  also include the City's proportionate interest in the West Shore Parks and Recreation Society ("West Shore"), an organization jointly controlled  by the City.  The City does not administer any trust activities on behalf of external parties. The City follows the accrual method of accounting for revenues and expenses.  Revenues are normally recognized in the year in which they are  earned and measurable.  Expenses are recognized as they are incurred and measurable as a result of receipt of goods or services and/or the  creation of a legal obligation to pay. Government transfers are recognized in the consolidated financial statements as revenues in the period in which events giving rise to the  transfer occur, providing the transfers are authorized, any eligibility criteria have been met, and reasonable estimates of the amounts can be  made, except when and to the extent the transfer gives rise to an obligation that meets the definition of a liability. Property tax revenue is recognized on an accrual basis using approved tax rates and the anticipated assessment for the current year.  Parcel tax  revenues are recognized in the year that they are levied. In March 2020, the Covid‐19 outbreak was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization.  The pandemic impacted the City's operations  resulting in a decrease in certain types of revenue, and changes in expenses and cash flows.  At this time this presents uncertainty over future cash  flows.  The City is closely monitoring the impact of the pandemic on all aspects of its operations and responding accordingly. The consolidated financial statements of the City are prepared by management in accordance with Canadian public sector accounting standards for  local governments as recommended by the Public Sector Accounting Board ("PSAB") of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada.  Significant  accounting policies adopted by the City are as follows: Deferred revenue includes grants, contributions and other amounts received from third parties pursuant to legislation, regulation and  agreement which may only be used in certain programs, in the completion of specific work, or for the purchase of tangible capital assets.  In  addition, certain user charges and fees are collected for which the related services have yet to be performed.  Revenue is recognized in the  period when the related expenses are incurred, services performed, or the tangible capital assets are acquired thereby extinguishing any  liability to the City. Development cost charges are amounts which are restricted by government legislation or agreement with external parties.  When qualifying  expenditures are incurred, development cost charges are recognized as revenue in amounts which equal the associated expenses. Receipts restricted by third parties are deferred and reported as refundable deposits under certain circumstances.  Refundable deposits are  returned when the third party meets their obligations or the deposits are recognized as revenue when qualifying expenditures are incurred. Investment income is reported as revenue in the period earned.  When required by the funding government or related Act, investment income  earned on deferred revenue is added to the investment and forms part of the deferred revenue balance. 9 Page 241 of 395 ### Page 242 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 242 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (g) Cash equivalents: (h) Long‐term debt: (i) Non‐financial assets: (i)  Tangible capital assets Asset Useful life ‐ years Land improvements 10‐50 Buildings 25‐70 Vehicles, machinery, equipment 5‐25 Sewer and storm infrastructure 75‐100 Road infrastructure 10‐75 (ii) (iii) Works of art and cultural and historic assets (iv) Leased tangible capital assets (v) Inventory of supplies (vi) Contaminated sites Contributions of tangible capital assets Tangible capital assets received as contributions are recorded at their fair value and are recorded as revenue at the date of receipt. Works of art and cultural and historic assets are not recorded as assets in these financial statements. Leases which transfer substantially all of the benefits and risks incidental to ownership of property are accounted for as leased tangible  capital assets.  All other leases are accounted for as operating leases and the related payments are charged to expenses as incurred. Inventory of supplies held for consumption is recorded at the lower of cost and replacement cost. 5)  a reasonable estimate of the liability can be made Contaminated sites are defined as the result of contamination being introduced in air, soil, water or sediment of a chemical, organic, or  radioactive material or live organism that exceeds an environmental standard.  A liability for remediation of contaminated sites is  recognized, net of any expected recoveries, when all of the following criteria are met: 1)  an environmental standard exists 2)  contamination exceeds the environmental standard 4)  future economic benefits will be given up, and 3)  the City is directly responsible or accepts responsbility for the liability Non‐financial assets are written down when conditions indicate that they no longer contribute to the City's ability to provide goods and  services, or when the value of future economic benefits associated with the asset are less than the book value of the asset. Long‐term debt is recorded net of related repayments. Non‐financial assets are not available to discharge existing liabilities and are held for use in the provision of services.  They have useful lives  extending beyond the current year and are not intended for sale in the ordinary course of operations. Tangible capital assets are recorded at cost which includes amounts that are directly attributable to acquisition, construction,  development or betterment of the asset.  The cost, less residual value, of the tangible capital assets, excluding land, are amortized on a  straight line basis over their estimated useful lives as follows: Cash equivalents include short‐term, highly liquid investments that are cashable on demand or have a term to maturity of 90 days or less at  acquisition. 10 Page 242 of 395 ### Page 243 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 243 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (j) Employee benefits: (k) Use of estimates: 3. Cash and cash equivalents: 2021 2020 West Shore Parks and Recreation Society $ 1,079,721              $ 2,226,266                Cash 52,451,954            37,302,356              Term deposits ‐                          15,051,382              $ 53,531,675            $ 54,580,004              The City has an approved  and undrawn operating line of credit of $10,500,000. 4. Deferred revenue: 2021 2020 Development cost charges $ 13,495,480            $ 18,151,483              Hotel room tax 1,153,107              907,893                    Other 930,338                  1,748,845                $ 15,578,925            $ 20,808,221              Development cost charges: 2021 2020 Opening balance of unspent funds $ 18,151,483            $ 19,434,367              Add:     Development cost charges received during the year 6,447,448              2,964,979                Interest earned 27,172                    171,893                    24,626,103            22,571,239              Less amount spent on projects and recorded as revenue (11,130,623)           (4,419,756)               $ 13,495,480            $ 18,151,483              The City and its employees make contributions to the Municipal Pension Plan.  These contributions are expensed as incurred.  The costs of a  multi‐employer defined contribution pension plan, such as the Municipal Pension Plan, are the employer's contributions due to the plan in the  period. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets  and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and  expenses during the period.  Estimates include assumptions used in estimating historical cost and useful lives of tangible capital assets,  estimating fair value of contributed tangible capital assets and in estimating provisions for accrued liabilities.  Actual results could differ from  these estimates. Deferred revenue, reported on the consolidated statement of financial position, is comprised of the following: 11 Page 243 of 395 ### Page 244 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 244 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 5. Debt: (a) Debt: (b) 2022 $ 1,491,400                2023 1,490,500                2024 1,498,100                2025 1,496,200                2026 and thereafter 12,787,689              Interest expense on debt during the year was $229,896 (2020 ‐ $445,585). 6. Tangible capital assets: (a) Assets under construction: (b) Contributed tangible capital assets: (c) Works of art and historical treasures: (d) Write‐down of tangible capital assets: (e) West Shore Parks and Recreation Society: Debt from the TD Bank is comprised of an interim financing facility which bears interest at Bankers Acceptance Rate plus stamping fee of 60  basis points.  The current rate of interest is 1.19%. The City's proportionate share of West Shore Parks and Recreation Society assets includes land, buildings, and equipment which are subject to  amortization policies consistent with those of the City. Principal payments on debt for the next five years and thereafter are as follows: Assets under construction have a value of $10,090,636 (2020 ‐ $5,635,799) and have not yet been amortized.  Amortization of these assets will  commence when the asset is put into service. Contributed tangible capital assets have been recognized at fair market value at the date of contribution.  The value of contributed capital  assets received during the year is $35,560,283 (2020 ‐ $29,945,883) comprised of land $25,083,926 (2020 ‐ $16,275,416), land improvements  $495,814 (2020 ‐ $1,102,129), Vehicles, machinery, equipment $nil (2020 ‐ $55,000), sewer and storm infrastructure $3,804,536 (2020 ‐  $4,775,992) and roads infrastructure $6,176,007 (2020 ‐ $7,737,346). The City manages and controls various works of art and non‐operational historical cultural assets including buildings, artifacts, paintings and  sculptures located at City sites and public display areas.  These assets are not recorded as tangible capital assets and are not amortized. No tangible capital assets were written down in 2021 or 2020. 12 Page 244 of 395 ### Page 245 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 245 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements West Vehicles Sewer and Assets Shore Parks Land Machinery & Storm Roads Under & Recreation Land Improvements Buildings Equipment Infrastructure Infrastructure Construction Society 2021 2020 Cost: Opening $ 222,615,736        23,051,084          49,732,259          15,458,062        71,134,628          182,661,038        5,635,799            35,059,785          $ 605,348,391        $ 565,745,386                 Additions 35,123,088          1,687,673            ‐                        167,991             5,178,499            12,209,097          8,414,826            3,109,998            65,891,172          43,293,536                    Transfers ‐                        835,194               ‐                        66,671                1,913,466            1,144,658            (3,959,989)           ‐                        ‐                        ‐                                  Disposals (4,893,893)           (157,350)              ‐                        ‐                      ‐                        (81,734)                 ‐                        ‐                        (5,132,977)           (4,047,126)                     Change in share ‐                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐                      ‐                        ‐                        ‐                        691,415                691,415                356,595                         Balance, end of year 252,844,931        25,416,601          49,732,259          15,692,724        78,226,593          195,933,059        10,090,636          38,861,198          666,798,001        605,348,391                 Accumulated Amortization: Opening ‐                        7,497,903            9,870,075            8,904,912          13,457,398          47,749,854          ‐                        11,848,810          99,328,952          90,993,327                    Disposals ‐                        (62,932)                ‐                        ‐                      ‐                        (68,645)                 ‐                        ‐                        (131,577)              (780,171)                        Amortization ‐                        1,174,681            1,043,405            975,025             1,158,772            4,431,111            ‐                        718,234                9,501,228            8,999,263                      Change in share ‐                        ‐                        ‐                        ‐                      ‐                        ‐                        ‐                        233,671                233,671                116,533                         Balance, end of year ‐                        8,609,652            10,913,480          9,879,937          14,616,170          52,112,320          ‐                        12,800,715          108,932,274        99,328,952                    Net book value, end of year $ 252,844,931        16,806,949          38,818,779          5,812,787          63,610,423          143,820,739        10,090,636          26,060,483          $ 557,865,727        $ 506,019,439                 Note 6.  Tangible Capital Assests (Continued)  13 Page 245 of 395 ### Page 246 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 246 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 7. Sewer franchise agreement: Opening Increase Decrease Closing WSES sewer infrastructure Cost $ 47,926,083      5,852,920      (1,375,768)             $ 52,403,235              Accumulated amortization (8,861,849)       (802,921)        ‐                          (9,664,770)               39,064,234      5,049,999      (1,375,768)             42,738,465              Remaining cost to be recovered ‐                    (5,852,920)    5,852,920              ‐                            $ 39,064,234      (802,921)        4,477,152              $ 42,738,465              8. Accumulated surplus: 2021 2020 Surplus: Invested in tangible capital assets $ 581,840,303          $ 523,979,864            Other (4,481,971)             (7,096,134)               Total surplus 577,358,332          516,883,730            Reserves set aside by Council: Future operational contingencies 1,445,274              3,745,671                Future capital contingencies 1,279,734              1,279,734                Federal Gas Tax 6,277,148              4,662,989                West Shore Parks & Rec Society 877,975                  500,927                    Total reserves 9,880,131              10,189,321              Reserve funds set aside for specific purposes by Council: Capital works 7,828,900              8,153,786                Affordable housing 3,322,109              2,929,981                Parks and open space 2,470,246              1,458,309                Parkland improvement 3,060                      3,054                        General amenity 5,105,962              3,725,940                Equipment replacement 1,552,843              1,156,798                Sidewalk capital 44,030                    21,215                      Bear Mountain fire hall 1,496,368              1,434,969                Special police capital 30,022                    ‐                            Special police operating 654,310                  905,586                    Downtown parking 124,669                  49,555                      Total reserve funds 22,632,519            19,839,193              $ 609,870,982          $ 546,912,244            During 2004, the City entered into a franchise and partnering agreement with West Shore Environmental Services Inc. ("WSES") and Terasen Utility  Services Inc.  The term of the agreement is 21 years, with a single 21 year renewal.  Under the agreement, the City grants an exclusive franchise to  WSES to design, construct, finance, own, and operate and maintain sanitary sewers in the City.  The City also grants an exemption from municipal  property tax for sewer infrastructure and WSES has been granted an Order in Council to extend that exemption to property taxes for all other  jurisdictions.  Upon termination of the agreement, the sewer infrastructure constructed by WSES will be acquired by the City for a nominal payment. WSES will recover its capital costs by imposition of a sewer capital recovery fee ("SCRF") on owners of property who wish to connect to the sewer.   WSES will also bill and collect all user fees.   WSES will pay the City franchise fees that are estimated to total $11 million over the 21 year term of the  agreement. The City records the costs of sewer infrastructure constructed by WSES $4,477,152 (2020 ‐ $3,128,209) and corresponding remaining cost to be  recovered.  The remaining cost to be recovered is reduced as SCRF's are collected by WSES. The cost of WSES sewer infrastructure, less residual value, is amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives, 60 to 70 years. During the 2021 year, the remaining costs to be recovered were in excess of the amount owing.  In accordance with the agreement, the City has  recorded an agency fee of the excess in the amount of $4,655,362 (2020 ‐ $4,020,753). Accumulated surplus consists of individual fund surplus and reserves and reserve funds as follows: 14 Page 246 of 395 ### Page 247 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 247 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 9. Taxation: 2021 2020 General $ 35,306,433            $ 32,676,780              Parcel tax 1,854,676              1,914,496                Revenue in lieu of taxes 144,904                  129,586                    Collections for other governments 36,878,325            31,196,447              1% utility taxes 476,497                  457,028                    74,660,835            66,374,337              Less taxes levied for other authorities: Capital Regional District ‐ General Operating 8,681,354              8,567,642                Revenue in lieu of taxes 123,213                  74,939                      Capital Regional Hospital District 2,615,002              2,631,540                School Authorities 21,365,741            15,997,226              BC Assessment Authority 621,701                  586,180                    Municipal Finance Authority 2,909                      2,700                        BC Transit 3,468,405              3,336,220                36,878,325            31,196,447              $ 37,782,510            $ 35,177,890              10. Government transfers: 2021 2020 Operating transfers: Federal $ ‐                          $ 33,908                      Provincial 3,010,188              5,740,676                Other 761,351                  828,442                    3,771,539              6,603,026                Capital transfers: Federal 3,166,049              1,542,306                Provincial 30,180                    605,300                    3,196,229              2,147,606                $ 6,967,768              $ 8,750,632                Taxation revenue, reported on the consolidated statement of operations, is comprised of the following: The City recognizes the transfer of government funding as revenue when received and all related eligibility criteria and stipulations have been  satisfied. 15 Page 247 of 395 ### Page 248 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 248 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 11. Municipal pension plan: 12. Commitments and contingencies: (a) Contingent liabilities: (b) Litigation liability: (c) Commitments: Total Amount Paid or  of Contract Accrued Operating $ 23,488,914            $ 6,656,489                From time to time, the City is subject to claims and other lawsuits that arise in the ordinary course of business, some of which may seek  damages in substantial amounts. Liability for these claims and lawsuits are recorded to the extent that the probability of a loss is likely and it is  estimable.  It is considered that the potential claims against the City resulting from such litigation will be covered by insurance and therefore  will not materially affect the consolidated financial statements of the City. The City and its employees contribute to the Municipal Pension Plan (the "Plan"), a jointly trusteed pension plan.  The board of Trustees, representing  plan members and employers, is responsible for administering the Plan, including investment of the assets and administration of benefits.  The plan is  a multi‐employer defined benefit pension plan.  Basic pension benefits provided are based on a formula.  As at December 31, 2020, the plan had about  220,000 active members and approximately 112,000 retired members.  Active members include approximately 42,000 contributors from local  governments. Every three years, an actuarial valuation is performed to assess the financial position of the plan and adequacy of plan funding.  The actuary  determines an appropriate combined employer and member contribution rate to fund the plan.  The actuary's calculated contribution rate is based on  the entry‐age normal cost method, which produces the long‐term rate of member and employer contributions sufficient to provide benefits for  average future entrants to the plan.  This rate may be adjusted for the amortization of any actuarial funding surplus and will be adjusted for the  amortization of any unfunded actuarial liability. The most recent actuarial valuation as at December 31, 2018 indicated a $2,866 million funding surplus for basic pension benefits on a going concern  basis.    The next valuation will be as at December 31, 2021 with results available later in 2022. Employers participating in the Plan record their pension expense as the amount of employer contributions made during the fiscal year (defined  contribution pension plan accounting).  This is because the Plan records accrued liabilities and accrued assets for the Plan in aggregate with the result  that there is no consistent and reliable basis for allocating the obligation, assets and cost to the individual employers participating in the Plan. The City paid $1,043,259 (2020 ‐ $945,970) for employer contributions while employees contributed $870,767 (2020 ‐ $792,681) to the Plan in fiscal  2021. The CRD debt, under provisions of the Local Government Act, is a direct, joint and several liability of the CRD and each member municipality  within the CRD, including the City of Langford. The City is a shareholder and member of the Capital Region Emergency Service Telecommunications (CREST) Incorporated who provides  centralized emergency communications, and related public safety information services to municipalities, regional district, the provincial and  federal governments and their agencies, and emergency services organizations throughout the Greater Victoria region and the Gulf Islands.   Members' obligations to share in funding ongoing operations and any additional costs relating to capital assets are to be contributed pursuant  to a Members' Agreement. The City entered into a long‐term contract with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) for the provision of police services effective  October 1, 1994.  Under the terms of this contract, the City is responsible for 90% of policing costs.  The 2022 estimated cost of this contract is  $10,238,992. On February 7, 2013, the City entered into a purchase of service agreement with the YMCA/YWCA of Greater Victoria to provide access for  Langford residents to an aquatic facility to be built in Langford.  The City agreed to pay $750,000 per year to be indexed by population every  two years from the opening date to a maximum of $950,000 per year for a period of 25 years. In 2021, the City entered into agreements for various property purchases.  The estimated commitment as of December 31, 2021 is $5,324,095.   Subsequent to December 31, 2021, the City has entered into agreements for property purchases and other capital projects with an estimated  commitment of $6,473,368. Operating contracts includes a cost of living factor for subsequent years.  These have not been included in the total amount of the contract as  the cost of living factor for subsequent years is currently not determinable.   As at December 31, 2021, the following major contracts were in  progress: 16 Page 248 of 395 ### Page 249 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 249 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 13. Contractual rights: 2022 $                   531,247  2023                   410,000  2024                   410,000  2025                   410,000  2026                   410,000  $                2,171,247  14. Financial plan: Revenues: Operating $ 57,305,233              Capital 40,211,275              West Shore Parks & Rec Society 4,398,753                Less: Transfers from own funds 14,138,674              Proceeds on debt issue 10,900,000              Total revenue 76,876,587              Expenses: Operating 57,305,233              Capital 40,211,275              West Shore Parks & Rec Society 4,369,667                Less: Capital expenditures 40,211,275              Transfer to own funds 2,780,737                Debt principal payments 1,496,300                Total expenses 57,397,863              Annual surplus $ 19,478,724              The City has entered into various contracts for rental revenue within the normal course of operations. The estimated contractual rights under these  contracts for the years ending December 31 are as follows: The financial plan data presented in these consolidated financial statements is based upon the 2021 operating and capital financial plans approved by  Council on May 10, 2021.  Amortization expense was not contemplated on development of the financial plan and, as such, has not been included.  The  chart below reconciles the approved financial plan to figures reported in these consolidated financial statements. Financial plan amount In addition to these contractural rights, the City has agreements with other parties that provide payments to the City based on a percentage earned  throughout the year. 17 Page 249 of 395 ### Page 250 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 250 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 15. West Shore Parks and Recreation Society: (a) Capital asset transfer: (b) Consolidation: 2021 2020 Financial assets $ 4,128,433              $ 4,767,787                Financial liabilities 2,755,185              4,211,496                Net financial assets 1,373,248              556,291                    Non‐financial assets 1,112,757              1,042,698                Accumulated surplus $ 2,486,005              $ 1,598,989                Invested in tangible capital assets $ 1,056,306              $ 987,218                    Reserve funds 1,864,050              1,098,559                Other (434,351)                (486,788)                  $ 2,486,005              $ 1,598,989                Revenues $ 11,161,070            $ 4,439,706                Requisition from members 5,268,639              5,071,039                16,429,709            9,510,745                Expenses 10,274,054            5,266,407                Requisition from members 5,268,639              5,071,039                15,542,693            10,337,446              Annual deficit $ 887,016                  $ (826,701)                  Condensed financial information for the Society is as follows: The Capital Regional District (the "CRD") transferred the lands and facilities comprising the Juan de Fuca Recreation Centre to the following  municipal members (the "Municipalities") effective January 2, 2002; City of Langford, City of Colwood, District of Highlands, District of  Metchosin and the CRD (on behalf of a portion of the Juan de Fuca Electoral Area).  Effective January 1, 2007 the Town of View Royal became a  member of the Society.  Effective January 1, 2018, the CRD is no longer a member of the Society. In 2002 the lands and facilities were transferred to the Municipalities in their proportionate share, as specified in the Co‐Owners' Agreement.   The lands and facilities were reallocated amongst the members on January 1, 2007 when the Town of View Royal became a member.  Future  improvements are allocated among the members as per the cost sharing formula in effect each year for each service or facility, as outlined in a  Members' Agreement.  For 2021, the City's share of improvements purchased by the Society on its behalf is $2,948,796. Because the cost sharing formula in the Members' Agreement produces different cost shares for the members from year‐to‐year, there is a  gain or loss on the opening fund balances.  In 2021, the City of Langford's change in cost share is $457,744.  The Municipalities have each become members in the Society, which was incorporated to provide parks, recreation and community services to  the Municipalities under contract.  Under terms of an Operating, Maintenance and Management Agreement, the Society is responsible to  equip, maintain, manage and operate the facilities located at the recreation centre. Financial results and budget for the Society are consolidated into the City's financial statements proportionately, based on the cost sharing  formula outlined in the Members' Agreement.  In 2021 the City's proportion for consolidation purposes was 53.66% (2020 ‐ 52.62%). Under the terms of an Operating, Maintenance and Management Agreement with the Members, the Society is responsible for the equipping,  maintenance, management and operation of the facilities comprising the Juan de Fuca Recreation Centre and Centennial Park Recreation  Centre.  The current agreement has a term of March 1, 2020 to February 28, 2025. 18 Page 250 of 395 ### Page 251 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 251 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 16. Segmented information: General Government Services Protective Services Engineering and Public Works Community Services Utility and Enterprise Services This Department is responsible for administering the Sewer Franchise Agreement (note 7) for the City. The accounting policies used in these segments are consistent with those followed in the preparation of the financial statements as disclosed in Note  2.  The following table provides additional financial information for the foregoing segments.  Taxation and grants in lieu of taxes are apportioned to  the functions based on their share of the net budgeted expenditures in the Financial Plan. The City is a diversified municipal government institution that provides a wide range of services to its citizens, including General Government Services,  Protective Services, Engineering and Public Works Services, Community Services and Utility and Enterprise Services.  Service Areas were created for  the purpose of recording specific activities to attain certain objectives in accordance with regulations, restrictions or limitations. City services are provided by departments and their activities are reported in these Service Areas.  Departments disclosed in the Segmented  Information, along with the services they provide are as follows: The Departments within General Government Services are responsible for adopting bylaws; adopting administrative policy; levying taxes; acquiring,  disposing and managing City assets; ensuring effective financial management; monitoring performance and ensuring that high quality City services  standards are met. The Departments within Protective Services are Police and Bylaw Enforcement; Fire Protection and Emergency Response; and Building Inspection.  The  mandates of these departments are to enforce laws, prevent crime, maintain peace, order and security by protecting life, property and the  environment. The Engineering Department is responsible for the transportation services within the City.  This includes roads, storm drains, sidewalks, street lighting  and trolley. The Departments within Community Services include Environmental and Development Services and Recreation and Cultural Services.  The  Environmental and Development Services Department is responsible for preparing land use plans, bylaws and policies for sustainable development of  the City and for reviewing and approving new development.  The Recreation and Cultural Services Department is responsible for providing, facilitating  the development of, and maintaining high quality parks, recreation facilities and cultural services. 19 Page 251 of 395 ### Page 252 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 252 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements General Engineering Utility and Government Protective and Public Community Enterprise  Services Services Works Services Services Total Revenue: Taxation $ 2,887,736          $ 14,891,482        $ 6,927,719          $ 13,075,573        $ ‐                  $ 37,782,510          Utility charges ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      5,000              5,000                    Government transfers 825,346             1,013,520          2,146,405          2,982,497          ‐                  6,967,768            Commercial leasing 62,044               60,285               ‐                      4,783,267          ‐                  4,905,596            Other 6,786,280          55,448               347,990             3,650,518          9,132,514      19,972,750          Licences and permits 38,040               3,469,679          326,909             1,286,340          ‐                  5,120,968            Developer and property owner contributions 11,588,628        59,150               17,061,564        12,345,893        3,820,484      44,875,719          Development cost charges ‐                      ‐                      7,484,365          3,646,258          ‐                  11,130,623          Casino 759,073             ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                  759,073               Total Revenue 22,947,147        19,549,564        34,294,952        41,770,346        12,957,998    131,520,007        Expenses: Salaries, wages and employee benefits 3,656,521          6,391,173          1,938,725          1,981,503          ‐                  13,967,922          Contracted and general services 2,182,066          10,882,793        6,019,991          15,888,534        4,655,362      39,628,746          Materials, goods, supplies and utilities 911,864             625,865             506,705             1,049,271          ‐                  3,093,705            Other 222,135             206,404             336,925             801,283             ‐                  1,566,747            Amortization 273,983             464,026             5,522,266          3,240,953          802,921          10,304,149          Total Expenses 7,246,569          18,570,261        14,324,612        22,961,544        5,458,283      68,561,269          Annual surplus (deficit) $ 15,700,578        $ 979,303             $ 19,970,340        $ 18,808,802        $ 7,499,715      $ 62,958,738          Note 16  2021 Segmented Information  (Continued) 20 Page 252 of 395 ### Page 253 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 253 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements General Engineering Utility and Government Protective and Public Community Enterprise  Services Services Works Services Services Total Revenue: Taxation $ 3,489,051          $ 13,595,380        $ 6,366,900          $ 11,726,559        $ ‐                     $ 35,177,890          Utility charges ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      5,000                 5,000                    Government transfers 5,390,586          1,013,014          1,921,888          425,144             ‐                     8,750,632            Commercial leasing 56,470               183,162             ‐                      3,681,802          ‐                     3,921,434            Other 4,754,378          76,935               442,278             2,766,581          7,148,962         15,189,134          Licences and permits 32,490               2,684,436          454,694             850,234             ‐                     4,021,854            Developer and property owner contributions 2,998,972          22,500               21,197,181        5,812,403          4,614,412         34,645,468          Development cost charges ‐                      ‐                      2,368,340          2,051,416          ‐                     4,419,756            Casino ‐                      ‐                      277,283             ‐                      ‐                     277,283               Total Revenue 16,721,947        17,575,427        33,028,564        27,314,139        11,768,374       106,408,451        Expenses: Salaries, wages and employee benefits 3,494,105          5,988,438          2,022,459          2,128,984          ‐                     13,633,986          Contracted and general services 2,135,604          11,068,399        4,627,576          13,364,109        4,020,753         35,216,441          Materials, goods, supplies and utilities 723,590             807,162             556,548             1,013,724          ‐                     3,101,024            Other 249,144             191,553             548,680             991,106             ‐                     1,980,483            Amortization 303,882             476,311             5,143,856          3,075,214          748,597            9,747,860            Total Expenses 6,906,325          18,531,863        12,899,119        20,573,137        4,769,350         63,679,794          Annual surplus (deficit) $ 9,815,622          $ (956,436)            $ 20,129,445        $ 6,741,002          $ 6,999,024         $ 42,728,657          Note 16  2020 Segmented Information (Continued) 21 Page 253 of 395 ### Page 254 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 254 CITY OF LANGFORD Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 17. 2021 2020 Funds Received, November 19, 2020 $ ‐                      4,878,000    Balance of unspent funds, beginning of year 2,803,000          ‐                Utilized to cover reduced revenues and increased expenses      Transferred to Capital Works Reserve (loss of Casino Funds) 1,400,000          1,130,000         Direct Expenses related to Covid Compliance 200,000             580,000            Lost Operating Revenues (estimate) 570,605             150,000            Reduced Hotel Tax ‐ due to reduced travel 158,367             215,000       Total Grant Funds Spent 2,328,972          2,075,000    Balance, end of year $ 474,028             $ 2,803,000    The City of Langford received $4,878,000 under the COVID‐19 Safe Restart Grant for Local Governments in 2020. The balance remaining at December 31, 2021 will be for use in future years to compensate for reduction in revenues and increased expenditures as a  result of Covid Compliance. Safe Restart Grant Schedule (Unaudited) 22 Page 254 of 395 ### Page 255 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 255 Page 1 of 2 t 250.478.7882 e administration@langford.ca 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, BC V9B 2X8 Staff Report to Council DATE: Monday, June 6, 2022 DEPARTMENT: Administration SUBJECT: POL-0162 ADMIN Surveillance Policy BACKGROUND: Staff have drafted the attached policy to set out the parameters around the use of video surveillance on City owned and/or occupied property. COMMENTARY: The City is using video surveillance as another tool to deter members of the public from committing vandalism and mischief on City owned or occupied property, specifically Starlight Stadium and The Langford Station. As such, staff is recommending that council adopt the attached policy which outlines how and when video surveillance will be used by the City, the storage of the information and the use or disclosure of the information. The Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner (OIPC) has indicated in their Public Sector Video Surveillance Guidelines that “(a) public body should use a video or audio surveillance system only where conventional means for achieving the same objectives are substantially less effective than surveillance and the benefits of surveillance substantially outweigh any privacy intrusion.” This policy has been crafted using the guideline referenced above. A Privacy Impact Assessment has been created for each of Starlight Stadium and the Langford Station. The decision to use video surveillance, in addition to the ongoing monitoring by security staff, was made based on the ongoing graffiti and damage being done to City property. All personal information will be securely stored and will be deleted on an ongoing basis unless it is needed for a specific investigation. Appropriate signage will be posted at all locations in accordance with the policy and the requirements under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Page 255 of 395 ### Page 256 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 256 POL-0162 ADMIN Surveillance Policy 20220606 Council Report Page 2 of 2 A reduction in graffiti and vandalism will result in savings; that value is difficult to quantify at this stage. Currently there are cameras installed at Starlight Stadium which are operated in accordance with this policy. New cameras will be purchased and installed at the Langford Station with funds coming from the already approved budget. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS: This policy is in accordance with the guidelines from the OIPC, and all required documentation will be maintained in accordance with the Act and any regulations. OPTIONS: Option 1 THAT Council Adopt Policy POL-0162 ADMIN Surveillance Policy. OR Option 2 THAT Council Take no action at this time with respect to Policy POL-0162 ADMIN Surveillance Policy. SUBMITTED BY: Marie Watmough, Acting Director of Corporate Services Concurrence: Donna Petrie, Manager of Business Development and Events Concurrence: Will Ying-udomrat, Manager of Legislative Services Concurrence: Matthew Baldwin, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Michelle Mahovlich, P.Eng, P.Geo, Director of Engineering and Public Works Concurrence: Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance Concurrence: Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer Page 256 of 395 ### Page 257 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 257 2nd Floor · 877 Goldstream Avenue · Langford, BC Canada · V9B 2X8 T · 250-478-7882 F · 250-478-7864 Policy Name: Surveillance Policy ☒ New ☐ Amendment DEPARTMENT: ADMIN SP Governance/Corporate Policy and Planning/Policies and Procedures POLICY NO: POL-0162-ADMIN General 1. This policy establishes guidelines for the City’s use of image capture using Cameras. 2. This policy applies to: a) All City-owned Cameras used to record Video Surveillance; b) Any Cameras installed or operated pursuant to an agreement or contract for services with the City of Langford, including operation of a City-owned facility where the use or operation of the video surveillance is required by the City pursuant to the terms of the agreement or contract. Definitions 3. In this policy: CAMERA means any camera or recording device and ancillary equipment used for the purpose of capturing video recordings or still images. CITY means the City of Langford. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER means the person appointed as Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) by Council, and includes their delegate. CONTRACTOR means a third-party individual or organization, which undertakes work on behalf of the City, including but not limited to, operating a City facility, pursuant to an agreement or contract. DEPARTMENT HEAD means an Employee in a management position. EMPLOYEE means any person engaged by the City of Langford, in any full-time, part-time, regular, temporary, student co-op employment or volunteer role. FOIPPA means the British Columbia Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSBC 1996 c. 165 as amended or replaced. HEAD OF PRIVACY means the person designated as Head of Privacy by the City’s Freedom of Information (FOI) Bylaw and includes their delegate but for the purposes of this policy does not include the Director of Corporate Services. Page 257 of 395 ### Page 258 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 258 PERSONAL INFORMATION has the meaning set out in FOIPPA. VIDEO SURVEILLANCE means a program for the capture of photographic images or video recordings, which is: a) for the purpose of monitoring behaviour and activities with respect to crime prevention; and/or b) set up in a fixed location. 4. The City recognizes that: a) The use of Cameras results in the collection of Personal Information; b) Options other than Video Surveillance may be as effective as Video Surveillance; c) Video Surveillance is not the only method of crime prevention or deterrence; and d) Video Surveillance programs for the purpose of crime prevention should only be contemplated after other alternative means of crime prevention have been considered. Compliance and Responsibilities 5. The roles and responsibilities for Video Surveillance are as follows: a) Every Employee is responsible for complying with FOIPPA, with this policy, with the City Privacy Policy and with City records management requirements; b) Department Heads, with the support of and direction from the Head of Privacy, are responsible for ensuring, including by undertaking audits, that Employees and Contractors comply with this policy; c) Department Heads, with the support of and direction from the Head of Privacy, are responsible for ensuring that Employees and Contractors with whom they have a direct reporting relationship receive appropriate and adequate operations, privacy, and security training where they may have access to Video Surveillance; d) Department Heads, with the support of and direction from the Head of Privacy, are responsible for ensuring any Employees or Contractors with access to Video Surveillance are aware that their operations will be subject to audit; e) The Head of Privacy is responsible for: i. Making recommendations to Department Heads and the CAO to improve program efficacy and protect Personal Information; ii. Reviewing this policy every two (2) years; and iii. Responding to Information Incidents as set out in the City Privacy Policy; f) The Manager of IT is responsible for ensuring that all electronic security measures are in place to secure Personal Information and to prevent unauthorized access to Personal Information; Page 258 of 395 ### Page 259 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 259 g) The Head of Privacy and Manager of IT are authorized to conduct further audits of Video Surveillance security and operations; and h) Department Heads, with the support of and direction from the Head of Privacy, are responsible for approving new Cameras. i) The Director of Corporate Services is responsible for addressing any concerns raised under section 30. Collection of Personal Information 6. The City must only collect, use, disclose, access, dispose or store Personal Information in accordance with FOIPPA, including but not limited to: a) Collecting only the personal information necessary for a program or activity of the City; b) Providing appropriate signage to inform of the collection of Personal Information through image capture, using the template in Appendix A; and c) Using the personal information only for the purpose collected. Process to Approve Cameras 7. New Cameras may be considered if: a) The use of Cameras for the program is necessary; b) Cameras are a suitable option based on the location and intent of the program; c) The hours of operation of the Cameras are restricted to those times when alternative measures are impracticable; and d) With respect to Video Surveillance, all other practicable means of accomplishing the goal have been considered. 8. To propose installation of a new Camera, Department Heads must complete the following at the earliest opportunity: a) Submit any accompanying material, such as a personal information disclosure statement or the proposed signage, to the Head of Privacy for review; b) Review the proposed program with the Head of Privacy, including completion of a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for review by or in conjunction with the Head of Privacy or delegate; c) If requested by the Head of Privacy and approved by the Director of Corporate Services, submit the PIA to the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner (OIPC) for comment; d) If the new use of Camera(s) constitutes a new program, submit documentation to the CAO which outlines all details of the program and a statement that the program has received approval from the Head of Privacy; and e) If requested by the CAO, seek a legal opinion. Page 259 of 395 ### Page 260 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 260 9. Proposals for New Video Surveillance programs must be evaluated using the following criteria: a) The number of incident reports of vandalism, theft, property damage, and safety concerns, if available; b) A summary of the other safety or security measures considered; c) How Video Surveillance is expected to resolve the above noted safety or security issues; d) Placement of Cameras and times of operation of Cameras; e) Expected impact on Personal Information; f) How the benefits of Video Surveillance will be balanced against any privacy concerns; g) Financial implications of Video Surveillance, including required staff resources and offsets from crime prevention; h) Any recommendations from the OIPC, if OIPC advice sought; i) Any legal advice, if legal advice sought; j) Any other specific issues identified by the PIA; k) The recommendations of the Department Head and of the Head of Privacy. 10. Existing Cameras which were not approved according to the process outlined in sections 7-9 should be reviewed for compliance as soon as practicable. Guidelines for Placement 11. Approved Video Surveillance must be configured as follows: a) Within a frame that includes only the area intended to be surveilled; i. To be active for the shortest time period possible, whether only operating at certain times of day or being removed once a program is complete; ii. Not placed to capture video or still images in areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy, including: 1. Bathrooms; 2. Change rooms; 3. A person’s regular workspace; 4. A residence; 5. Into the windows of other buildings; or 6. Private property. b) Placed to record defined areas rather than open streets and other undefined spaces. 12. Individuals must be notified that they are entering an area that is monitored by Cameras through signage placed at every entrance to the area under surveillance. The notice must include the following information: a) The fact that the area is monitored by Cameras; Page 260 of 395 ### Page 261 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 261 b) The Personal Information being collected; c) The purpose(s) for the collection of Personal Information; d) The legal authority for the collection of Personal Information; e) The title of the Employee who can provide further information about the program, their phone number, and business address; f) A pictogram of a video camera; and g) If audio surveillance is used, a statement that the area is under audio surveillance. Refer to the attached Appendix A for sample wording. Use and Disclosure 13. Video Surveillance may be accessed and viewed in response to reports of possible criminal activity including, without limitation, acts of vandalism, property crime, theft, or safety concerns. 14. For clarity, Video Surveillance may not be used for the following: a) To supervise Employee performance or verify Employee attendance; or b) Where there is no potential or verified problem that can reasonably be mitigated using video surveillance. 15. Access to Cameras, including recordings and images, is limited to the following individuals, and where a specific position is named, includes their delegate: a) CAO; b) Director of Corporate Services; c) Head of Privacy; d) FOI staff in response to an information request; e) Bylaw staff, for investigative purposes including matters involving vandalism, theft, property damage or safety concerns on City property; f) IT staff, as needed to respond to information requests, maintain equipment and verify proper image capture; g) The Department Head of any Employee assigned to review recordings or images or maintain equipment; h) The Department Head responsible for Risk Management; i) An employee appointed by a Contractor in accordance with the terms of the governing contract or agreement; j) Any other person designated by the CAO to have access to footage for a specific purpose; 16. In addition, Video surveillance recordings and images may be requested by the following: Page 261 of 395 ### Page 262 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 262 a) Legal counsel for the City for purposes of litigation or potential litigation; or b) RCMP or other police bodies for purposes of investigating a law enforcement matter. 17. If Video Surveillance recordings and images are disclosed to a police body for law enforcement purposes, the following information must be recorded: a) What recordings and images were disclosed; b) When it was disclosed; c) The organization and person the disclosure was made to; d) Under what authority the disclosure was made; and e) Whether the recordings and images will be returned or destroyed after use. 18. Except as otherwise permitted, only the Personal Information of a party making a request may be released, all other Personal Information must be withheld in accordance with FOIPPA. 19. Information incidents and privacy breaches must be addressed as outlined in the City Privacy Policy. Records Management 20. Video Surveillance recordings and images will be kept for a period of up to thirty (30) days, after which it will be considered transitory material and deleted. 21. Video Surveillance recordings or images requested by third parties or law enforcement bodies, or which the City deems to be of value for the purpose for which it was collected, will be retained and considered to be a record. 22. Video Surveillance recordings and images that contain Personal Information and that are used by or on behalf of the City to make a decision directly affecting the individual must be retained for at least one year after use. 23. All records must be stored and disposed of in accordance with FOIPPA and with the City’s Records Classification and Retention Schedule. Evaluation 24. Audits must be carried out regularly, and in any case not less than once per year, the results must be documented in detail, and any concerns promptly addressed. 25. Every Video Surveillance program must be evaluated annually by the Department Head, Head of Privacy, and Manager of IT to review: a) Staff and Contractor training; b) Program security; c) Audits; d) Access logs; Page 262 of 395 ### Page 263 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 263 e) Signage; f) Whether the program is effective; g) Impact on privacy; and h) Whether the program is still justified. 26. Any concerns raised by a Department Head, Head of Privacy or Manager of IT during the annual Video Surveillance evaluation must be reported to the Director of Corporate Services by the Head of Privacy. Security 27. The City will use the following security measures to secure Video Surveillance: a) Installing and maintaining appropriate network security, such as firewalls; b) Installing appropriate device security, such as encryption on electronic storage devices; c) Installing physical barriers, including locked doors, locked cabinets and/or building alarm systems to restrict access to City or contractor premises with access to footage; d) Maintaining access logs, whether manual or automated; and e) Ensuring secure disposal of old storage devices and records. 28. In addition to any other detail deemed necessary by the Head of Privacy or the Manager of IT, access logs must contain the following information: a) Name of the person(s) accessing the footage; b) Reason for accessing; c) Description of the footage viewed and, where necessary, being retained; and d) Any related details, such as law enforcement case number and officer identification. 29. Employees and contractors must review and sign the Surveillance Policy prior to being given access to Video Surveillance. I, ____________________________, acknowledge receipt of the Surveillance Policy, and confirm that I have read the policy and that I hereby agree to abide by the terms of the policy. _______________________________ ___________________________ SIGNATURE DATE APPENDIX A: Signage template FOIPPA states that a public body must ensure that an individual from whom it collects personal information is told: Page 263 of 395 ### Page 264 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 264  What personal information is being collected,  The purpose for collecting it,  The legal authority for collecting it (e.g. FOIPPA section), and  The title, business address and business telephone number of an officer or employee of the public body who can answer the individual's questions about the collection. To accomplish this, signage must be placed at all of the entrances to an area under video surveillance, and the following template may be used. For other purposes, speak with the Head of Privacy about the appropriate format. To use this statement, replace the highlighted areas with information about your own program, then submit to the Head of Privacy for review. This area may be under video [and audio] surveillance for the purpose of [reason for surveillance] under section 26(c) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Personal Information may be collected including video or photographic images of individuals. All information collected shall be used and maintained in accordance with the Act. [Pictogram of video camera] Please direct any inquiries to the City of Langford Freedom of Information coordinator at 250-478-7882, foi@langford.ca. Adopted by Council Meeting Date: June 6, 2022 CERTIFIED CORRECT Administrator Date: Page 264 of 395 ### Page 265 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 265 Page 1 of 3 t 250.478.7882 e administration@langford.ca 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, BC V9B 2X8 Staff Report to Council DATE: Monday, June 6, 2022 DEPARTMENT: Administration SUBJECT: New Westhills Sign - Request for Licence Agreement BACKGROUND: Westhills Land Corp. has approached city staff requesting permission to install a new Westhills sign. The sign would be installed along the sloped portion of dedicated road adjacent to Constellation Avenue, as shown below in Figure 1.0. Council may wish to instruct staff to enter into a licence agreement with Westhills Land Corp. to allow the installation and occupation of this sign. The City will not have any responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of the sign under the proposed terms. Figure 1.0: Conceptual Photo of Proposed Sign Page 265 of 395 ### Page 266 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 266 New Westhills Sign – Request for Licence Agreement 20220606 Council Report Page 2 of 3 COMMENTARY: As authorized under the Community Charter, the City may permit a licence to occupy land that is owned by the City. The licence agreement would be valid for a term of 20 years, unless terminated sooner as per the agreement. The licence agreement is required to ensure that Westhills Land Corp. is responsible for the maintenance of the sign at all times and at its own expense. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Westhills Land Corp. will provide the City with bonding to remove the sign and restore the licensed area at the end of the term. As a condition of the licence agreement Westhills Land Corp. will obtain and maintain $5,000,000 in liability insurance for the sign and include the City as additionally insured. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS: The licence agreement has been drafted by the City’s legal department. OPTIONS: Option 1 THAT Council Enter into a licence agreement for this sign with Westhills Land Corp. on the terms attached and authorize the Mayor and CAO to execute the agreement with such minor amendments as may be necessary. OR Option 2 THAT Council Not authorize the licence agreement for this sign with Westhills Land Corp. Page 266 of 395 ### Page 267 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 267 New Westhills Sign – Request for Licence Agreement 20220606 Council Report Page 3 of 3 SUBMITTED BY: Daryl Minifie, AScT, Senior Land Development Technologist Concurrence: Leah Stohmann, MCIP, RPP, Deputy Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Yari Neilson, Manager of Parks and Recreation Concurrence: Donna Petrie, Manager of Business Development and Events Concurrence: Will Ying-udomrat, Manager of Legislative Services Concurrence: Matthew Baldwin, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Michelle Mahovlich, P.Eng, P.Geo, Director of Engineering and Public Works Concurrence: Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance Concurrence: Marie Watmough, Acting Director of Corporate Services Concurrence: Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer Page 267 of 395 ### Page 268 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 268 1 LICENCE AGREEMENT CON22-0122 This licence is dated for reference the 30 May 2022. BETWEEN: City of Langford 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, British Columbia V9B 2X8 (the “City”) AND: Westhills Land Corp. 204 – 957 Langford Parkway Langford, BC V9B 0A5 (the “Licensee”) GIVEN THAT: A. The Licensee is the owner in fee simple of the following lands within in the City of Langford legally described as: PID: 003-863-271 Lot C Sections 1 and 4 Goldstream District Plan 18094 except part in Plans 26999 EPP44948 EPP73365 EPP75182 EPP70121 EPP78695 EPP72562 EPP82887 EPP87052 EPP98822 EPP100544 and EPP102674; B. The City owns the highway lands known as Constellation Avenue, plan number EPP87052, located adjacent to the Licensee’s above-noted property. The Licensee has requested a license to occupy upon a portion of this highway land from the City for the purposes of erecting a monument sign, as described below; C. As authorized under the Community Charter, the City may permit an license to occupy on land that is owned by the City. THIS LICENCE is evidence that in consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Licence and the payment of $10.00 by the Licensee to the City (the receipt and sufficiency of which the City acknowledges), the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. The City hereby grants a licence to the Licensee of that portion of highway approximately identified in heavy black line on the sketch attached as Schedule A attached to this Agreement (the “License Area”), for the sole purpose of installing a monument sign (the “Sign”). The parties agree that the Page 268 of 395 ### Page 269 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 269 2 area identified in Schedule A is an approximate location and the final location will be confirmed by the parties prior to installation. The parties agree that the agreed upon area where the sign is actually installed will be the final Licensed Area for the purposes of this Agreement. The City grants this license subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2. The term of this Licence is for twenty (20) years, commencing June 1, 2022, and terminating on May 31, 2042 (the “Term”), unless extended by written agreement or unless terminated sooner pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 3. Concurrently with the signing of this Agreement, the Licensee will give to the City bonding in an amount set by the City, which shall be the approximate cost of removing the sign and restoring the Licensed Area at the end of the Term. 4. In consideration of the granting of this License, the Licensee will maintain the landscaping of the License Area for the duration of the Term. 5. The Licensee agrees and acknowledges that the Licensed Area shall remain free of structures other than the Sign and that the Licensee will keep and maintain the Licensed Area, and an area of two (2) metres around the outside of the Licensed Area, in good and sufficient repair to the satisfaction of the City. 6. The Licensee shall replace and relocate all plants and greenery displaced by the Sign at their own expense, including irrigation and plant replacement costs during the Term, as per section 4 above. 7. The Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the landscaping and maintenance of the land surrounding the Licensed Area are minimally maintained by the City and agrees that this Agreement does not obligate the City to increase or change the current level of maintenance on the Lands surrounding the Licensed Area. 8. The Licensee further acknowledges the Licensed Area has irrigation infrastructure located under the surface, The Licensee agrees that repair to damage caused to existing irrigation lines during installation, and/or the moving of existing irrigation lines required to conform to IIABC requirements because of the Sign installation, shall be done at the cost of the Licensee. The Licensee further agrees to realign any sprinkler heads required to ensure proper coverage as per IIABC and BCLNA standards and Bylaw 1000. 9. Upon the last day of the Term, or upon earlier termination of the Licence, the parties will complete an inspection to ensure the Licensee has left the Licensed Area in a condition comparable to the condition of the Licensed Area at the signing of this Agreement, reasonable wear and tear excepted. Licensee agrees that the City may deduct amounts from the bond and will pay the City any other additional amounts required to return the Licensed Area to its original condition. The Licensee will pay such amounts to the City within 30 days of receipt of an invoice. The City will return the bond or remainder thereof, if any, within 30 days of the completion of this inspection. 10. The Licensee permits the City and its officers, employees, contractors and agents to enter into and upon the Licensed Area at all reasonable times for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and inspecting or removing any public works or utilities, and ensuring the Licensee’s compliance with Page 269 of 395 ### Page 270 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 270 3 this Licence. 11. The Licensee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, contractors and agents, from and against all claims, actions, damages, liabilities, costs (including legal costs), and expenses arising from any occurrence on or within the Licensed Area, or caused by or contributed to by the negligence or other default of the Licensee in respect of anything done pursuant to or ostensibly pursuant to this Agreement including without limitation the construction, operation, maintenance and repair of the Sign. The Licensee shall not be liable for any claims, actions, damages, liabilities, costs (including legal costs) and expenses if such claim, action, damages, liabilities, costs or expenses are caused solely by the negligence of the City. This indemnity shall survive the expiry or earlier termination of this Licence. 12. The Licensee agrees to obtain and maintain at its sole expense general liability insurance in an amount not less than $5,000,000.00 per occurrence, and the insurance policy shall: (a) name the City of Langford as additional insured; (b) include that the City is protected notwithstanding any act, neglect, or misrepresentation by Licensee which might otherwise result in an avoidance of a claim and that such policies are not affected or invalidated by any act, omission or negligence of any third party which is not within the knowledge or control of the insured; (c) be issued by an insurance company entitled to carry on the business of insurance under the laws of British Columbia with a financial credit rating of “A” or better; (d) be primary and non-contributing with respect to any policies carried by the City and that any coverage carried by the City is in excess coverage; (e) not be cancelled or materially modified without the insurer providing the City with 30 days written notice stating when such cancellation is to be effective or identifying the modification; (f) be maintained for a period of 12 months after this Agreement is terminated; (g) include a cross liability clause such that the City and Licensee are each insured as if each had purchased the policy of insurance; and (h) be on other terms acceptable to the City, acting reasonably. 13. The Licensee will promptly provide the City with certificates of insurance confirming the insurance requirements under this Licence are met upon the execution of this Agreement and thereafter upon demand by the City, including evidence of any material amendment to the policy. 14. If the Licensee fails to maintain insurance as required by this Agreement, the City in its sole discretion may, after fourteen (14) days’ notice to the Licensee, obtain such insurance in whole in or in part. If the City obtains such insurance, the Licensee shall reimburse the City for the cost of Page 270 of 395 ### Page 271 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 271 4 that insurance plus a fifteen percent (15%) administration fee, within fifteen (15) days of receiving a written invoice from the City. For Clarity, the City has no obligation to obtain any insurance required to be maintained by the Licensee. 15. The Licensee understands and agrees that the City may at any time, in its sole discretion, terminate this licence upon 90 days written notice to the Licensee. If the City terminates this Agreement, the Licensee shall, at its own expense, within such time as may be specified by the City, remove the Sign and fill up with any excavation made, constructed or maintained with respect to it, and otherwise restore the Licensed Area to its original state to the satisfaction of the City. 16. If the City requires the removal of the Sign due to requiring use of some or all of the area in which the Sign is located, it will make reasonable efforts to identify a location adjacent to (or overlapping with, as may be the case) the Licensed Area (the “New Licensed Area”), to which the Sign may be relocated, in which case the Licensee may relocate the Sign to the New Licensed Area at its cost, and the parties shall cause the sketch attached to this Agreement as Schedule A to be updated to reflect such area. 17. If the Licensee chooses not to renew this Agreement and fails to clear the Licensed Area as required under this Agreement, the City and its agents may remove all fixtures, chattels, improvements, personal property and all other things on the Licensed Area. The cost of removal will be a debt due and owing to the City by the Licensee upon receipt by the Licensee of the City’s invoice. 18. The Licensee acknowledges there are no covenants, agreements, conditions, representations, or warranties by or binding on the City with respect to the Licensed Area except as expressly set out in this Licence and the Schedules attached to this Licence. 19. Nothing in this Agreement exempts the Licensee from complying with all applicable laws, including all municipal bylaws, or from obtaining all required permits and licenses relating to the use of the Licensed Area or the Sign. 20. The Licensee releases and forever discharges the City from all manner of claims of any nature whatsoever which may arise by reason of any act or omission of the City pursuant to this Agreement. 21. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, the Licensee shall not be entitled to compensation for injurious affection or disturbance resulting in any way from the removal of the Sign and, without limitation, shall not be entitled to business losses, loss of profit, loss of market value, relocation costs or other consequential loss by reason of the removal of the Sign or by reason of the termination of the Agreement. 22. This Agreement grants no interest in land in the Licensed Area to the Licensee. 23. Waiver of any default by either party shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. 24. The Licensee is not permitted to assign this Licence, in whole or in part, and shall not permit or suffer any other person to occupy the whole or any part of the Licensed Area. As an exception to Page 271 of 395 ### Page 272 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 272 5 the foregoing, should the Licensee sell that part of the Lands on which the License is located, then the Licensee is permitted to assign this Agreement to the new owner of such part of the Lands. 25. The Licensee may not sublicence this Licence without the City’s prior written consent. 26. Whenever the singular or masculine is used in this Agreement, the same is deemed to include the plural or feminine or the body politic or corporate as the context requires. 27. Every reference to each party is deemed to include the heirs, executors, administrators, permitted assigns, employees, servants, agents, contractors, officers, directors and invitees of such party, where the context so permits or requires. 28. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalid portion shall be severed and the decision that it is invalid shall not affect the remainder of this Agreement. 29. The provisions herein contained constitute the entire agreement between the parties and supersede all previous communications, representations and agreements, whether verbal or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 30. Time is of the essence. 31. This Licence enures to the benefit and is binding upon the parties and their respective successors, heirs and permitted assigns. 32. The schedules referred to in this Licence and attached hereto form a part of this Licence. 33. Any notice or communication required or permitted to be given under this Licence will be in writing unless otherwise specified and will be effectively given if mailed in Canada by first class mail, postage prepaid, delivered and addressed or directed as follows: To the City at: Attention: Corporate Officer City of Langford 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, B.C. V9B 2X8 Email: mwatmough@langford.ca To the Licensee at: Attention: Lisa Parkes, Corporate Counsel Westhills Land Corp. 204 – 957 Langford Parkway Victoria, BC V9B 0M3 Page 272 of 395 ### Page 273 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 273 6 Email: lparkes@westhillsbc.com or to such other address as a party may specify by notice given as set out above. 34. Any notice or other communication will be deemed to have been received as follows: (a) if delivered before 4:00 p.m., on the date of delivery if it is a business day and otherwise on the next business day; (b) if mailed, on the third business day following the date on which it was mailed; and (c) If emailed, on the date the email was sent if sent before 4:00 p.m. on a business day, and otherwise on the next business day. 35. In this Licence, “business day” means any day Monday through Friday, except statutory holidays. TO EVIDENCE THEIR AGREEMENT each of the parties has executed this Licence on the date first noted above. Westhills Land Corp. has executed this Licence by its authorized signatories: _ Jamie Robertson _______________________________ Kyle Taylor The City has executed this Licence by its authorized by its authorized signatories: Mayor Chief Administrative Officer Page 273 of 395 ### Page 274 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 274 7 Schedule A Page 274 of 395 ### Page 275 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 275 S E W E R STORMWATER 1.9:1 1.8:1 1.5:1 1.3:1 1.4:1 1.3:1 1.3:1 1.6:1 2.0:1 2.3:1 1.8:1 1.3:1 95 100 100 100 100 100 105 105 105 105 105 110 110 110 110 110 0+870 10+880 89.60 89.78 0 1:500 10 30m ON POINT - August 19, 2021 9:23 AM \\WHLC-FILE02.CORP.WHLC.CA\WHLC-STORE02\PROJECTS\001 WESTHILLS\001-100 WESTHILLS SIGN\03 CAD & DESIGN\DESIGN DRAWINGS\001-100 WESTHILLS SIGN.DWG SEAL REVISIONS ISSUES No. DESCRIPTION DATE SIGN No. DESCRIPTION DATE SIGN NOVA LANDS ON POINT PROJECT No. GOVERNING AUTHORITY FILE No. ON POINT DRAWING No. NOVA LANDS WESTHILLS PRELIMINARY WESTHILLS SIGN LOCATION ---- 001-100 001-100-C100 SHEET 1 OF 1 REV: TEL: 250 478-7875 WWW.OPPEL.CA SUITE 111 - 957 LANGFORD PKWY VICTORIA BC V9B 0A5 DESIGNER: REVIEWED: ZT ER ENGINEER: MP DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWING 50mm The copyrights to all designs and drawings are the property of On Point Project Engineers Ltd. Reproduction or use for any purpose other than that authorized by On Point Project Engineers Ltd. is forbidden. Contractor must check and verify all dimensions and conditions on site and report any discrepancies to engineer prior to proceeding with work. 2021.08.18 FOR INFORMATION ONLY SIDEWALK BOULEVARD CONSTELLATION AVE PROPOSED SIGN LOCATION 25.9m 3.9m 5.6m 1 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION 2021-08-18 ER Page 275 of 395 ### Page 276 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 276 Page 1 of 3 t 250.478.7882 e administration@langford.ca 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, BC V9B 2X8 Staff Report to Council DATE: Monday, June 6, 2022 DEPARTMENT: Administration SUBJECT: Road Closure and Disposition of Leigh Road at Donna Avenue BACKGROUND: The owner of 1106 and 1112 Goldstream Avenue, 1198137 BC Ltd., plans to construct a commercial building. They have offered to purchase a portion of Leigh Road right-of-way, shown below in Figure 1.0, to be consolidated with their property. This area of Leigh Road at Donna Avenue and Goldstream Avenue has been determined to be surplus road area, not required for any future intersection expansion. Page 276 of 395 ### Page 277 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 277 Road Closure and Disposition of Leigh Road at Donna Avenue 2022 05 06 Council Report Page 2 of 3 In 2020, Council passed road closure Bylaw 1916, which closed this area of road as well as a portion of Donna Avenue, see attached. Since then, the road closure area requested for purchase has been reduced. This report is for Council to consider Bylaw 2095, which will amend Bylaw 1916 by changing the road closure plan. The smaller area of road closure to be closed is shown above in Figure 1.0 and on the attached road closure plan EPP100734. COMMENTARY: As part of the purchase and sale agreement the purchaser will be responsible to relocate the frontage improvements and register statutory right of ways for any utilities in the road closure area. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Council’s policy is to use the assessed value unit cost of the adjacent lot to value the road area to be disposed, this value is approximately $35.00 per square foot based on 2020 rates which is when the negotiations for this property began. The total sale price for this portion of closed road will be $76,351.10, this amount will go into the city’s capital works reserve fund. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS: There are no known legal implications with the purchase and sale of this portion of road. The purchase and sale agreement has been drafted in consultation with the City’s legal department. Public notice for the road closure and disposition will be made prior to the adoption of Bylaw 2095, as required by the Community Charter. OPTIONS: Option 1 THAT Council 1. Direct staff to post a public notice for the road closure and disposition as required by the Community Charter. 2. Approve the purchase and sale agreement with 1198137 BC Ltd for the portion of closed road on Leigh Road shown on attached plan EPP100734 and authorize the Mayor and Corporate Officer to execute the agreement after the legislative requirements for a public notice have been met. 3. Consider giving Road Closure Bylaw 2095, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd readings. Page 277 of 395 ### Page 278 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 278 Road Closure and Disposition of Leigh Road at Donna Avenue 2022 05 06 Council Report Page 3 of 3 OR Option 2 THAT Council Take no action at this time with respect to the proposed road closure of this portion of Leigh Road. SUBMITTED BY: Daryl Minifie, AScT Senior Land Development Technologist Concurrence: Leah Stohmann, MCIP, RPP, Deputy Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Donna Petrie, Manager of Business Development and Events Concurrence: Will Ying-udomrat, Manager of Legislative Services Concurrence: Matthew Baldwin, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Michelle Mahovlich, P.Eng, P.Geo, Director of Engineering and Public Works Concurrence: Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance Concurrence: Marie Watmough, Acting Director of Corporate Services Concurrence: Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer Page 278 of 395 ### Page 279 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 279 Page 279 of 395 ### Page 280 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 280 Page 280 of 395 ### Page 281 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 281 Page 281 of 395 ### Page 282 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 282 Page 282 of 395 ### Page 283 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 283 Page 283 of 395 ### Page 284 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 284 Page 284 of 395 ### Page 285 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 285 Page 285 of 395 ### Page 286 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 286 Page 286 of 395 ### Page 287 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 287 Page 287 of 395 ### Page 288 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 288 Page 288 of 395 ### Page 289 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 289 Page 289 of 395 ### Page 290 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 290 Page 290 of 395 ### Page 291 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 291 Page 291 of 395 ### Page 292 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 292 Page 292 of 395 ### Page 293 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 293 Page 293 of 395 ### Page 294 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 294 Page 294 of 395 ### Page 295 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 295 Page 295 of 395 ### Page 296 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 296 Page 296 of 395 ### Page 297 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 297 CITYOFLANGFORD ROAD CLOSURE BYLAW NO. 1916, 2020 (portion of Donna Avenue and Leigh Road) WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 40 of the Community Charter, Council nnay, by bylaw, close a portion of a highway to traffic and remove the dedication of the highway, if prior to adopting the bylaw, Council publishes notices of its intention in a newspaper and provides an opportunity for persons who consider they are affected by the bylaw to make representations to Council; AND WHEREAS the Council of the City of Langford deems it expedient to close to traffic and remove the dedication of highway of that portion of highway comprisinga total of approximately (7596.Ift^), which was dedicated as highway byPlans 8198, 8988, 22423and VIP84403 Sections79 and 99, Esquimalt District, shown outlined in a bold black line on the reference plan EPP100734 prepared by Powell & Associates, BCLS, a reduced copy of which is attached hereto (the ''Road Closure Plan''); AND WHEREAS notices of Council's intention to close that portion of highway to traffic and to remove its dedication as highway were published ina newspaper and posted inthe public notice posting place, and Council has provided an opportunity for persons who consider they are affected by the closure to make representations to Council; AND WHEREAS the Council does not consider that the closure of the Closed Road will affect the transmission or distribution facilities or works of utility operators; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Cityof Langford, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. Attached to this Bylaw as Schedule "A" and forming part of this Bylaw is a reduced copy of the reference plan of highway closure (the ''Road Closure Plan"). 2. The City hereby authorizes the closureto trafficand removal of highway dedication of: the 0.07 hectares of highway, which was dedicated as highway by Plans 8198, 8988, 22423 and VIP84403 Sections 79 and 99, Esquimalt District, labelled "Road to be Closed" on the Road Closure Plan. (the "Closed Road"). 3. On deposit of the Road Closure Plan and all other documentation for the closure of the Closed Road in the Victoria Land Title Office, the Closed Road isclosed to public traffic, it shall cease to be public highway, and its dedication as a highway is cancelled. 4. The Mayorand the ChiefAdministrative Officer ofthe City are authorized to execute all deeds of land, plans and other documentation necessary to affect this road closure and disposition. Page 297 of 395 ### Page 298 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 298 Road Closure Bylaw No. 1916, 2020 Page 2 of 3 5. This Bylaw maybe cited as "Road Closure Bylaw No. 1916 (portionof Donna Avenue and Leigh Road), 2020." READ A FIRST TIME this 1^' day of June, 2020. READ A SECOND TIME this T' day of June, 2020. READ ATHIRD TIME this 1^* day of June, 2020. APPROVED BY THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE THIS 24"^ DAY OF JUNE, 2020. ADOPTED this 29*'^ day of June, 2020. (C^fied Correct) CHIEF ADMINISTR IVE OFFICER TORRENKIEDYK CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER Page 298 of 395 ### Page 299 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 299 Reference Plan to accompany Bylaw No 1916 (City of Longford) To Close Parts of Road Dedicated on Plans 8198, 8988, 22423 and VIP84403 Sections 79 and 99, Esquimalt District BCGS 92B.0+3 Pursuant io Sscticn 120 of the Land TitJe Aci and Section 40 of the Community Charter a aim stwi rieeud at a tf lisos. SCHEDULE "A" - Road Closure Plan EPP67B15 strata Goldstream Avenue V1SS63 ^1P6!641 •»1SSS4 Stratii floi E^ei ^eom AvaoL-e PLAN EPP100734 Detail "A" , f 12H2670 Mar.EPPS'/aia i 1157® i8^pe.jas Page 299 of 395 ### Page 300 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 300 SURVEY PLAN CERTIFICATION PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA PAGE OF PAGES Your electronic signature is a representation that you are a British Columbia land surveyor and a subscriber under section 168.6 of the Land Title Act, RSBC 1996 c.250. By electronically signing this document, you are also electronically signing the attached plan under section 168.3 of the act. 1. BC LAND SURVEYOR: (Name, address, phone number) Surveyor General Certification [For Surveyor General Use Only] 2. Control Number: PLAN IDENTIFICATION: Plan Number: This original plan number assignment was done under Commission #: LTO Document Reference: 3. CERTIFICATION: Form 9 Explanatory Plan Form 9A (YYYY/Month/DD) The checklist was filed under ECR#: (YYYY/Month/DD) (YYYY/Month/DD) The field survey was completed on: The plan was completed and checked on: I am a British Columbia land surveyor and certify that this plan was completed and checked on: that the checklist was filed under ECR#: and that the plan is correct in accordance with Land Title Office records. None Strata Form S I am a British Columbia land surveyor and certify that the buildings included in this strata plan have not been previously occupied as of (YYYY/Month/DD) None Strata Form U1 Strata Form U1/U2 I am a British Columbia land surveyor and certify that the buildings shown on this strata plan are within the external boundaries of the land that is the subject of the strata plan Certification Date: (YYYY/Month/DD) I am a British Columbia land surveyor and certify: 1. That the buildings shown on this strata plan are within the external boundaries of the land that is the subject of the strata plan subject to clause 2 of this endorsement 2. That certain parts of the buildings are not within the external boundaries but appropriate and necessary easements of other interests are registered as set out in section 244 (1)(f) of the Strata Property Act. Registered Charge Number(s): Certification Date: (YYYY/Month/DD) Arterial Highway I am a British Columbia land surveyor and certify that I am authorized by the Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure under section 44.1 of the Transportation Act to show certain lands identified on this plan dedicated as Arterial Highway. 4. ALTERATION: LTO Document Reference: This is an alteration to a previous version of this plan identified by control number: DESCRIPTION OF ALTERATION: SEE SCHEDULE Remainder Parcel (Airspace) I am a British Columbia Land Surveyor and certify that no portion of the parcels or dedications created on this plan overlap vertically, that is, lie above or below any portion of the Air Space parcels on Air Space Plan Page 300 of 395 ### Page 301 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 301 Page 301 of 395 ### Page 302 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 302 CITY OF LANGFORD ROAD CLOSURE BYLAW NO. 2095, 2022 (portion of Goldstream Avenue and Leigh Road) The Council of the City of Langford, in open meeting assembled, hereby enacts as follows: 1. Langford Road Closure Bylaw No. 1916, 2020 (the “Bylaw”) is amended as follows: a. By deleting ‘Schedule “A” – Road Closure Plan EPP100734’ from the Bylaw and replacing it with the amended “Schedule “A” – Road Closure Plan EPP100734” appended hereto. b. By deleting the following from section 2 of the Bylaw: “the 0.07 hectares of highway, which was dedicated as highway by Plans 8198, 8988, 22423 and VIP84403 Sections 79 and 99, Esquimalt District, labelled “Road to be Closed” on the Road Closure Plan” and replacing it with the following: “that portion of highway comprising a total of approximately 202.7 m2 (2181.8 ft2), which was dedicated as highway by Plan 8198 Sections 79 and 99, Esquimalt District, shown outlined in a bold black line and labelled “Road to be Closed” on the reference plan EPP100734 prepared by Powell & Associates, BCLS, a reduced copy of which is attached hereto as Schedule “A”;” c. This Bylaw may be cited as “Road Closure Bylaw 1916, Amendment No. 1 (portion of Goldstream Avenue and Leigh Road), Bylaw No. 2095, 2022.” READ A FIRST TIME this day of June, 2022. READ A SECOND TIME this day of June, 2022. READ A THIRD TIME this day of June, 2022. APPROVED BY THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE THIS DAY OF JUNE, 2022. ADOPTED this day of, 2022. ___ PRESIDING COUNCIL MEMBER CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER Page 302 of 395 ### Page 303 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 303 SCHEDULE “A” – Road Closure Plan Page 303 of 395 ### Page 304 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 304 Page 1 of 2 t 250.478.7882 e administration@langford.ca 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, BC V9B 2X8 Staff Report to Council DATE: Monday, June 6, 2022 DEPARTMENT: Land Development APPLICATION NO.: SUB21-0015 SUBJECT: Road Closure Bylaw 2074 – 639 and 641 Strandlund Avenue BACKGROUND: At their Regular Meeting of May 16th, 2022, Council passed the following resolution with respect to the property at 639 & 641 Strandlund Avenue: THAT Council: 1. Consider 1st, 2nd, and 3rd readings to Road Closure Bylaw No. 2074, 2022 (639 and 641 Strandlund Avenue); COMPLETE and 2. Authorize Mayor and CAO to enter into the Purchase and Sale Agreement; COMPLETE COMMENTS: Public Notice of the road closure and disposition was completed as prescribed in the Community Charter. The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure signed Road Closure Bylaw No. 2074 on 3 of June, 2022 as required. As there are no further conditions, Council may consider adopting Road Closure Bylaw No. 2074. OPTIONS: Page 304 of 395 ### Page 305 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 305 Road Closure Bylaw 2074 – 639 and 641 Strandlund Avenue 20220606 Council Report Page 2 of 2 Option 1 THAT Council adopt Road Closure Bylaw No. 2074, 2022 (639 & 641 Strandlund Avenue); OR Option 2 THAT Council take no action at this time with respect to Road Closure Bylaw No. 2074. SUBMITTED BY: James Oliver, Senior Land Development Technologist Concurrence: Leah Stohmann, MCIP, RPP, Deputy Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Chris Aubrey, Fire Chief Concurrence: Lorne Fletcher, Manager of Community safety and Municipal Enforcement Concurrence: Yari Nielsen, Manager of Parks and Recreation Concurrence: Donna Petrie, Manager of Business Development and Events Concurrence: Will Ying-udomrat, Manager of Legislative Services Concurrence: Matthew Baldwin, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Michelle Mahovlich, P.Eng, P.Geo, Director of Engineering and Public Works Concurrence: Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance Concurrence: Marie Watmough, Acting Director of Corporate Services Concurrence: Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer Page 305 of 395 ### Page 306 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 306 CITY OF LANGFORD ROAD CLOSURE BYLAW NO. 2074, 2022 Road Closure Bylaw WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 40 of the Community Charter, Council may, by bylaw, close a portion of a highway to traffic and remove the dedication of the highway, if prior to adopting the bylaw, Council publishes notices of its intention in a newspaper and provides an opportunity for persons who consider they are affected by the bylaw to make representations to Council; AND WHEREAS the Council of the City of Langford deems it expedient to close to traffic and remove the dedication of that portion of highway comprising a total of approximately 47m2 (505.9ft2) known as Strandlund Avenue which was dedicated as highway by Plan 10723 and is shown outlined in a bold black line on reference plan EPP118684 prepared by Lloyd R.P. Eakins, BCLS 833, a reduced copy of which is attached hereto (the "Road Closure Plan"); AND WHEREAS notices of Council's intention to close that portion of highway to traffic and to remove its dedication as highway were published in a newspaper and posted in the public notice posting place, and Council has provided an opportunity for persons who consider they are affected by the closure to make representations to Council; AND WHEREAS the Council does not consider that the closure of the Closed Road will affect the transmission or distribution facilities or works of utility operators; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the City of Langford, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. Attached to this Bylaw as Schedule "A" and forming part of this Bylaw is a reduced copy of the reference plan of highway closure. (the "Road Closure Plan"). 2. The City hereby authorizes the closure to traffic and removal of highway dedication of: the 47m2 (505.9ft2) of highway which were dedicated as highway (which was dedicated by Plan 10723) and labelled "Closed Road" on the Road Closure Plan. (the "Closed Road"). 3. On deposit of the Road Closure Plan and all other documentation for the closure of the Closed Road in the Victoria Land Title Office, the Closed Road is closed to public traffic, it shall cease to be public highway, and its dedication as a highway is cancelled. 4. The Mayor and the Chief Administrative Officer of the City are authorized to execute all deeds of land, plans and other documentation necessary to affect this road closure and disposition. CERTIFIED CORRECT WIHYing-Ud°mObRPORATE OFFICER Deputy Corporate Officer Page 306 of 395 ### Page 307 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 307 Road Closure Bylaw No. 2074, 2022 Page 2 of 3 5. This Bylaw may be cited as "Road Closure Bylaw No. 2074 (Strandlund Avenue), 2022". READ A FIRST TIME this 16th day of May, 2022. READ A SECOND TIME this 16th day of May, 2022. READ A THIRD TIME this 16th day of May, 2022. APPROVED BY THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE day of , 2022. ADOPTED this day of, 2022. PRESIDING COUNCIL MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER CERTIFIED CORRECT AtAm );,,i,p/m/17 CORPORATE OFFICER Will Ying-Udomrat Deputy Corporate Officer Page 307 of 395 ### Page 308 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 308 Road Closure Bylaw No. 2074, 2022 SCHEDULE "A" — Road Closure Plan cc 0 LL cc 0 cc 0 0 17Z Plan 37530 _ Min Men has sdthin The rasdlol Ragland DarOCL Weyhfeenburg Land Suweying lna www.stisyswveys.cont .0 ,2e27 James 01111 Rwhalent Std.. DC Sat 125 'depend (250)050-5,20 Few 1813110\e00eE 11.. 01018 sormy reormonted by MO Om /MS ...risaclad 0 :Joy' R. P. fugal. 251.5 the th day of Mora. 3.022. Reference Plan To Accompany Bylaw No. 2074 (City of Langford), To Close Part of Road Dedicated on Plan 10723. Section 109, Esquimalt District. Pursuant to Section 120 of the Land Title Act And Section 40 of the Community Charter. BCCS 92E1.043 +321 3 10 ID 7731 Wended plot s:za of ells pan Is 0.121ner In licispt by When lo sdreh (1.! dee) tdxn *and ro, a Ned". Legend: oi ,JCO. GhtfuliC,5 ors in moires. wavers cdtroselar hauled. lntsgrotod Survey Ned S1 Ow My of Langford MADEWCSRS) 10.0.8G CO. Old nornhoe cr. elem.(' (me aboancteons Parisian 00011,01 1(1.11.100510 94101024 und 0312575. end oic rekereed to the Central Meridian .0 1110/ Zola 10 Plan EPP118684 0 Denotes 37onoo00 Contra; Alonionant Found • 060019, Slonaatet bort Post Fauna 5e1,320f4 /ow Plat .nar • 0 cr Brusx geft in Tod, 15. UTAI scorenolies ono absolute occurocy ocieend we dernmd from convert (Mad minty cosermtions orodet:c control manuremte 104711524 dna 0212515. Air plan siva,' horizottol prouno—,evel defame, trocm.t nhwtl behaseiso To compute gdo distance. mortal), scouno—loval dmicocae by oornbined Mohr 09a961.17.:: which ims been cia-MM from g0000tk eon's°, 'nun/manta 9sHI5.24 and 0311.25:5 9 Plan 10723 Or NOM' 17 . 4 . daa tees 01 TINA Strandlund 1 Plan VIP 78821 vi? ds,4 sme .0 A Plan V1P75191 Rem pd. A inD 592:9) 62GRW 2 PG° A Plan 48039 Strata Plan EPS4100 8 Plan 10723 Strata Lot 1 Strata Plan V1S6842 94117.121. 13109 0342515 Datum 140116.3 (00.5) 3.33a01.= 0731 Ana 10 Orb ISOrtlanye 0.0.7011.302 0110 Eastna: 453214.201 Shanitdd Accurory nn;* 14111124 Oche, leADLIJ ICSii.5) .11195.1.047D 011.1 70.0 10, 1.171.1 Northing 5363172.7e5 WV fasting 44.3031700 Absokte aceamcy. 0.225, Page 308 of 395 ### Page 309 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 309 Page 1 of 2 t 250.478.7882 e administration@langford.ca 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue Langford, BC V9B 2X8 Staff Report to Council DATE: Monday, June 6, 2022 DEPARTMENT: Planning SUBJECT: Bylaw Nos. 2046, 2047, and 2048 – Planning, Subdivision, and Building Application Fee Adjustments BACKGROUND: At their Regular Meeting held April 4th, 2022, Council approved the 2022-2026 Five Year Financial Plan with a property tax increase of 2.95%. COMMENTARY: As has occurred in previous years, staff have prepared bylaws to amend the Planning, Subdivision, and Building related fees commensurate with the general tax increase. As such, Bylaw No. 2048 has been drafted to adjust the following fees by 2.95%:  OCP amendment applications;  Rezoning applications;  Public hearings;  Development Permit and Development Permit amendment applications;  Development Variance Permit applications;  Letters of exemption;  Temporary Use Permit applications; and  Board of Variance applications. Bylaw No. 2046 includes a 2.95% fee adjustment to Subdivision related fees. Staff propose a $2,500 fee for road closure and dispositions and for encroachment agreements. This fee is to recover the cost to prepare a purchase and sale agreement, road closure bylaw, and/or encroachment agreement as well as staff time. The applicant will furthermore be responsible for the costs of surveying and any requirement advertisements. Staff also propose a per lot fee of $200 when amending an existing statement of conditions. Bylaw No. 2047 includes fee adjustments to Building Permit related fees. Page 309 of 395 ### Page 310 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 310 Bylaw Nos. 2046, 2047, and 2048 – Planning, Subdivision, and Building Application Fee Adjustments 20220606 Council Report Page 2 of 2 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Increasing fees to keep up with the cost of living should maintain the relationship between applications and cost recovery. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS: None. OPTIONS: Option 1 THAT Council: 1. Consider giving first, second, and third reading to Bylaw No. 2046; and 2. Consider giving first, second, and third reading to Bylaw No. 2047; and 3. Consider giving first, second, and third reading to Bylaw No. 2048; OR Option 2 THAT Council: 1. Take no action at this time with respect to adjusting application fees. SUBMITTED BY: Trina Cruikshank, Land Development Assistant Concurrence: Leah Stohmann, MCIP, RPP, Deputy Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Matthew Baldwin, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning and Subdivision Concurrence: Wayne Robinson, Manager of Building Services Concurrence: Donna Petrie, Manager of Business Development and Events Concurrence: Will Ying-udomrat, Manager of Legislative Services Concurrence: Michelle Mahovlich, P.Eng, P.Geo, Director of Engineering and Public Works Concurrence: Michael Dillabaugh, CPA, CA, Director of Finance Concurrence: Marie Watmough, Acting Director of Corporate Services Concurrence: Darren Kiedyk, Chief Administrative Officer Page 310 of 395 ### Page 311 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 311 CITY OF LANGFORD BYLAW NO. 2046 A BYLAW TO AMEND THE SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICING BYLAW The Council of the City of Langford, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. City of Langford Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 1000 is amended as follows: i) By replacing Table 1 – 1 “Applications and Fees” in Schedule 1 Procedures and Fees with the table attached. 2. This Bylaw may be cited as “Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw, Amendment No. 23, 2022 (Fee Schedule), Bylaw No. 2046”. READ A FIRST TIME this day of, 2022. READ A SECOND TIME this day of, 2022. READ A THIRD TIME this day of, 2022. ADOPTED this day of, 2022. MAYOR (Certified Correct) CORPORATE OFFICER Page 311 of 395 ### Page 312 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 312 Bylaw No. 2046 Page 2 of 2 Table 1 – 1 Applications and Fees Section Application Type Fee Unit Fee 1.1.1 Application for the Approving Officer’s Statement of Conditions (Residential Lots) $545 Plus, per new lot created: • $200 for <500m2 lots (any zone) • $200 for >500m2 and <835m2 lots in an R2 zone • $200 all other residential 1.1.1 Application for the Approving Officer’s Statement of Conditions (Commercial or Industrial) $650 Plus, per new lot created: • $500 for Commercial or Industrial 1.3.1 Boundary Adjustment $915 Plus $250 per each additional lot line to be adjusted 1.4.1 Revised application for a Statement of Conditions (when applied for within one year of original application) $915 Plus, per new lot created: • $200 for <500m2 lots (any zone) • $200 for >500m2 and <835m2 lots in an R2 zone • $200 all other residential 1.5.1 Extension of a Statement of Conditions $325 12-month extension 1.5.1 Signature Expiration (or re-signature) $125 1.6 Approval of a Phased Strata Plan; or amendment of Phased Strata Plan (due upon Form P submission) $915 $500 Per phase 1.7.1 Strata-Title Conversion Residential Compliant $915 1.7.1 Strata-Title Conversion Residential Non-Compliant $2,485 1.7.1 Strata-Title Conversion Commercial/Multi Family/ Industrial Compliant $1,805 1.7.1 Strata-Title Conversion Commercial/Multi Family/ Industrial Non-Compliant $3,610 1.8.1 Air Space Parcel $650 Plus, per new lot created: • $400 Residential and other non commercial or industrial uses • $500 Commercial, Industrial Plus $5,000 for legal review, the unused portion of which shall be refunded Road Closure and Disposition or Encroachment Agreement $2500 For Council to consider an application where a road closure and disposition or encroachment are requested (plus the cost of required advertisements and surveying) Council Consideration $165 For Council to consider an application that proposes a lot width where the frontage for a lot is less than 10% of the lot perimeter 1.9.1 Application for Pre-Design Meeting $915 Plus, per new lot created: • $200 for <500m2 lots (any zone) • $300 for >500m2 and <835m2 lots in an R2 zone • $500 all other residential • $500 Commercial or Industrial 1.10.1 Application to Construct – On Site (Construction Administration Fee) $915 Plus 2.5% of engineers estimate of cost of works and services up to $200 000 and 1% of the remainder Application to Construct – Off Site (in existing road ROW) (Construction Administration Fee) In accordance with Highway Use Bylaw (Bylaw No. 33) To include all utilities except Hydro 1.12.2 Application for Final Approval of a Subdivision $850 Plus, per new lot created: • $150 for <500m2 lots (any zone) • $200 for >500m2 and <835m2 lots in an R2 zone • $400 all other residential • $500 Commercial or Industrial • DCC Payment Due (Residential ONLY) Integrated Survey Area Program Plan $52 $50 per lot created by subdivision or strata Page 312 of 395 ### Page 313 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 313 CITY OF LANGFORD BYLAW NO. 2047 A BYLAW TO AMEND BYLAW NO. 1160, “LANGFORD BUILDING BYLAW NO. 1160, 2008” The Council of the City of Langford, in open meeting assembled, hereby enacts as follows: A. Bylaw No. 1160 cited as “Building Bylaw No. 1160, 2008” is amended as follows: 1. By deleting Appendix “A” to Bylaw No. 1160 and replacing it with Appendix “A” attached to this bylaw. B. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Langford Building Bylaw No. 1160, Amendment No. 15, 2022, Bylaw No. 2047”. READ A FIRST TIME this day of, 2022. READ A SECOND TIME this day of, 2022. READ A THIRD TIME this day of, 2022. FINALLY PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of, 2022. ___________________________________ _________________________________ PRESIDING COUNCIL MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Page 313 of 395 ### Page 314 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 314 Bylaw No. 2047 Page 2 of 4 APPENDIX "A” A. GENERAL 1. Double Permit Fee - if any work for which a permit is required under this bylaw shall commence before a permit has been obtained, the fee payable as determined in the above schedule shall be doubled. 2. Refunds - At any time before the work has commenced in respect to which a permit has been issued, the permit holder may apply for cancellation of the permit. Upon receipt of such application, the Chief Building Inspector, if satisfied that the work has not commenced, shall cancel the permit and shall refund to the permit holder 50% of the fee paid in respect of the permit, but not less than the application fee. 3. Re-inspection Fees - Where any inspection carried out pursuant to this bylaw discloses faulty work and a subsequent inspection is made necessary, the fee for such subsequent inspection shall be $60.10. Where a permit holder fails to have the work to be inspected accessible and ready at the time the inspection is called for, the Chief Building Inspector may charge an additional fee of $60.10 for each subsequent call for inspection made necessary. Re-inspection fees must be paid prior to the re-inspection. 4. Reduction of Fee Where a Certified Registered Professional Reviews - Where a registered professional engineer or architect reviews and certifies an application for a building permit as being in compliance with this bylaw and the Building Code, and where the City of Langford relies upon that certification in issuing a building permit, the building permit fee shall be reduced by 5%. B. SCALE OF FEES - BUILDING PERMITS 1. The charge for permits issued in accordance with this Bylaw, shall be based on the value of construction as determined by the Chief Building Inspector and the fee shall be calculated in accordance with the following scale: (a) For permits $1,000.00 or less in value $60.10 (b) For permits in excess of $1,000.00, the fees shall be $60.10 for the first thousand, plus $12 per thousand or part for the next $99,000.00, plus $9.65 per thousand, or part thereof, for the next $900,000, plus $4.85 per thousand, or part thereof, for the next $14,000,000, plus $2.45 per thousand or part thereof for all values in excess of $15,000,000. (c) For extension of permit $60.10 (d) Application Fee, non-refundable, included in Building Permit Fee, paid at the time of building permit application: (1) For permits with a construction value of $200,000 or less $116.8 (2) For permits with a construction value more than $200,000 $1,134.57 Page 314 of 395 ### Page 315 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 315 Bylaw No. 2047 Page 3 of 4 (e) Revision fees (1) For permits with a construction value of $500,000 or less $60.10 (2) For permts with a construction value of more than $500,000 $120.20 2. The value of construction shall be the greater of: (a) the contract price including taxes and a reasonable allowance for extras, or (b) the estimated value as determined by the Chief Building Inspector in accordance with the Marshall & Swift, “Marshall Valuation Service” or “Residential Cost Handbook”. 3. The fee for a permit to wreck, demolish or remove a building from a lot shall be: $60.10 plus deposits and fees as required. 4. The fee for a permit to move a building on to a site shall be based on the value of the building and the value of work required on site. The minimum permit fee shall be $120.20. C. SCALE OF FEES - PLUMBING PERMITS 1. Plumbing Fixtures: (a) For each fixture $18.15 (b) For any alteration or replacement not involving installation of a fixture $30.05 (c) For each internal roof leader $12.00 (d) Hydronic heating system $60.10 2. Sewer Connections: (a) House storm drain $30.05 (b) House sanitary sewer $30.05 (c) House sanitary sewer and removal or de-commission of septic tank $60.10 (d) For private storm drains or sanitary sewers larger than 100 mm (4 in) $30.05 or longer than 76 m (250 ft) per 30.5 m (100 ft) (e) Manholes, catch-basins or interceptors $60.10 (f) Pumping stations $60.10 Page 315 of 395 ### Page 316 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 316 Bylaw No. 2047 Page 4 of 4 3. Fire Protection Equipment: (a) Sprinkler system 1 to 8 sprinkler heads $36.05 (b) Each additional 20 sprinkler heads $24.05 (c) Standpipe hose outlets $24.05 (d) Fire Hydrants $24.05 4. Hot Water Storage Tank $18.15 5. Residential Irrigation System $36.05 6. Commercial Irrigation System $120.20 7. Floor drain for hot water tank $18.15 8. Water and drain connections for a swimming pool (each) $18.15 9. Minimum plumbing permit fee $18.15 10. Water service connection to property line $30.05 D. SCALE OF FEES - CHIMNEY, FIREPLACE AND SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE PERMITS AND OIL BURNING EQUIPMENT 1. Chimney $30.05 2. Fireplace Including Chimney $48.20 3. Unused Solid fuel burning stove, range, furnace, boiler, or space heating $30.05 appliance (existing chimney) 4. Unused Solid fuel burning stove, range, furnace, boiler or space $48.20 heating appliance (new Chimney) 5. Installation or replacement of a residential oil burning furnace $30.05 6. Removal and/or replacement of a residential oil supply tank $30.05 7. Installation or replacement hydronic heating boiler $30.05 Page 316 of 395 ### Page 317 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 317 CITY OF LANGFORD BYLAW NO. 2048 A BYLAW TO AMEND BYLAW NO. 209, “DISTRICT OF LANGFORD DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES, 1997” The City of Langford Council in open meeting assembled enacts as follows: 1. Bylaw No. 209, cited as “District of Langford Development Procedures, 1997” is amended by: a) By replacing Schedule ‘D’ with the following: “ Official Community Plan Amendment Fees Application Type Base Fee Public Hearing Combined Fee Application concurrent with Application to Rezone $2,478 nil $2478 All Land Uses <1000m2 of site area $3,466 $2,729 $6,194 All Land Uses 1001m2 – 8094m2 (2ac) of site area $6,975 $2,729 $9,909 All Land Uses >8094m2 – 40,467m2 (10ac) $10,276 $2,729 $13,004 All Land Uses >40,467m2 (10ac) $12,753 $2,729 $15,481 Zoning Amendment Fees Application Type Base Fee Public Hearing Combined Fee Text amendment only, under existing zoning for changes to Density Bonusing provisions $1,116 $2,729* $3,845 Text Amendment only under existing zoning for changes to not more than two (2) aspects of the Zoning Bylaw, other than Density Bonus provisions $2,227 $2,729* $4,955 All Land Uses <1000m2 of site area $3,466 $2,729* $6,194 All Land Uses 1001m2 – 8094m2 (2ac) of site area $7,160 $2,729* $9,888 All Land Uses >8094m2 – 40,467m2 (10ac) $10,276 $2,729* $13,004 All Land Uses >40,467m2 (10ac) $12,515 $2,729* $15,243 *Fee reduced to $2,148 if public hearing waived **Add $2,349 for the creation of a new zone designation” Page 317 of 395 ### Page 318 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 318 Subject: Bylaw No. 2048 Page 2 of 4 b) By replacing Schedule ‘E’ with the following: “ Development Permit Fees If any work for which a permit is required commences prior to a permit being issued, the fee payable shall be doubled. Interface Fire Hazard Development Permit Area (ONLY) – Development Permit for one- and two- family residential development on an individual lot and/or the creation of not more than two lots by subdivision where development is fully compliant with Interface Fire Hazard design guidelines. $310 Riparian Development Permit Area (ONLY) – Development Permit for one- and two-family residential development on an individual lot where no work is occurring within a Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area (SPEA) as defined by a qualified professional; $618 Two-Family Residential (Duplex) - compliant with Design Guidelines and which may or may not include Interface Fire Hazard Development Permit Area;* $991 Two-Family Residential (Duplex) – not compliant with Design Guidelines and which may or may not include Interface Fire Hazard Development Permit Area and may or may not include variances;** $2,539 For combined Environmentally Sensitive/Hazardous and Form & Character applications, fees shall be paid on the basis of the greater of either the Environmentally Sensitive/Hazardous Development Permit Area(s) Impacted (column A) OR the scale of development (column B) Column A Column B Fee Environmentally Sensitive/Hazardous Development Permit Areas Impacted Form & Character Less than 150m2 of site area within a defined development permit area Less than 100m2 of new commercial/industrial/business park GFA; and/or exterior renovation of existing intensive residential (including duplex) or multi-family residential buildings that represents a change to the form and character of a building or buildings and/or Garden and carriage suites $618 150-1000m2 of site area within a defined development permit area Up to and including 4 residential units; and/or Up to 200m2 of new Com/Ind/Bus Park GFA; and/or exterior renovation of existing Com/Ind/Bus Park buildings up to 200m2 of GFA that represents a change to the form and character of a building or buildings; $2,227 1001-4500m2 of site area within a defined development permit area 5- 12 residential units; and/or Up to 300 m2 of new Com/Ind/Bus Park GFA and/or Exterior renovation of existing Com/Ind/Bus Park buildings up 2000m2 of GFA that represents a change to the form and character of a building or buildings; $4,706 4,501-25,000m2 of site area within a defined development permit area 13-49 residential units; and/or Up to 4500 m2 of new Com/Ind/Bus Park GFA and/or exterior renovation of existing Com/Ind/Bus Park buildings over 2000m2 of GFA that represents a change to the form and character of a building or buildings; $7,181 >25,000m2 of DP site area 50+ residential units; and/or 4501 m2+ of new Com/Ind/Bus Park GFA $11,763 *A duplex development permit issued by Council’s delegate Page 318 of 395 ### Page 319 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 319 Subject: Bylaw No. 2048 Page 3 of 4 **A duplex development permit issued by Council Development Permit Amendment Fees The Director of Planning may consider the following types of amendments to an issued Development Permit, where such changes maintain the overall intent of the previously issued Development Permit and are consistent with the Development Permit Area Guidelines appended to Zoning Bylaw No. 300 Minor amendment for changes that are eligible for a Development Permit Exemption in accordance with s.1.4 of Appendix A to Zoning Bylaw No. 300 No Fee, unless a Letter of Exemption is requested or required Minor amendment for changes that: • Require the issuance of a Development Permit Amendment for the purpose of issuing a variance to reduce a bylaw requirement by no more than 10% $248 Moderate amendment for changes that: • Require the issuance of a Development Permit Amendment for the purpose of: • Increasing floor space by more than 10% of the GFA originally approved, but less than 20%; • Issuing a variance to reduce a bylaw requirement by more than 10%; • Adjusting a streamside protection and enhancement area per the conditions specified in s.2.3.4 of Appendix A to the Zoning Bylaw No. 300 and where such adjustment is supported by the project biologist 16% of the original fee Major amendment for changes that are not considered to be a Minor or Moderate amendment 27% of the original fee Appeal Fee (if Development Permit cannot be issued by Council’s delegate) $1,547 in addition to above fees Development Permit Issued by Council with Variances (other than duplex) $1,547 in addition to the above fees Letter of Exemption from the Requirements of a Development Permit $124 Other Fees Board of Variance $774 Counter Petition: If the City is required to provide a counter petition opportunity as a result of any planning related application (Official Community Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Development Permit, Development Variance Permit, and Temporary Use Permit). $693 Development Variance Permit Fees Application Fee $1,547 Temporary Use Permit Fees Application Fee $2,168 Renewal Fee $310 Page 319 of 395 ### Page 320 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 320 Subject: Bylaw No. 2048 Page 4 of 4 2. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "City of Langford Development Procedures, Amendment Bylaw No. 23, 2022, Bylaw No. 2048". READ A FIRST TIME this day of, 2022. READ A SECOND TIME this day of, 2022. READ A THIRD TIME this day of, 2022. ADOPTED this day of 2022. ___________________________________ __________________________________ PRESIDING COUNCIL MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Page 320 of 395 ### Page 321 Source pages: 140–321 ## Page 321 Page 321 of 395 [Image 1: extracted visual asset on page 147] [Image 2: extracted visual asset on page 148] [Image 3: extracted visual asset on page 149] [Image 4: extracted visual asset on page 150] [Image 5: extracted visual asset on page 155] [Image 6: extracted visual asset on page 156] [Image 7: extracted visual asset on page 156] [Image 8: extracted visual asset on page 157] [Image 9: extracted visual asset on page 158] [Image 10: extracted visual asset on page 160] [Image 11: extracted visual asset on page 161] [Image 12: extracted visual asset on page 162] [Image 13: extracted visual asset on page 163] [Image 14: extracted visual asset on page 164] [Image 15: extracted visual asset on page 165] [Image 16: extracted visual asset on page 166] [Image 17: extracted visual asset on page 172] [Image 18: extracted visual asset on page 173] [Image 19: extracted visual asset on page 176] [Image 20: extracted visual asset on page 177] [Image 21: extracted visual asset on page 178] [Image 22: extracted visual asset on page 179] [Image 23: extracted visual asset on page 180] [Image 24: extracted visual asset on page 181] [Image 25: extracted visual asset on page 189] [Image 26: extracted visual asset on page 190] [Image 27: extracted visual asset on page 194] [Image 28: extracted visual asset on page 195] [Image 29: extracted visual asset on page 200] [Image 30: extracted visual asset on page 200] [Image 31: extracted visual asset on page 200] [Image 32: extracted visual asset on page 200] [Image 33: extracted visual asset on page 200] [Image 34: extracted visual asset on page 201] [Image 35: extracted visual asset on page 201] [Image 36: extracted visual asset on page 201] [Image 37: extracted visual asset on page 201] [Image 38: extracted visual asset on page 201] [Image 39: extracted visual asset on page 202] [Image 40: extracted visual asset on page 204] [Image 41: extracted visual asset on page 205] [Image 42: extracted visual asset on page 205] [Image 43: extracted visual asset on page 206] [Image 44: extracted visual asset on page 206] [Image 45: extracted visual asset on page 207] [Image 46: extracted visual asset on page 208] [Image 47: extracted visual asset on page 208] [Image 48: extracted visual asset on page 209] [Image 49: extracted visual asset on page 210] [Image 50: extracted visual asset on page 211] [Image 51: extracted visual asset on page 213] [Image 52: extracted visual asset on page 231] [Image 53: extracted visual asset on page 233] [Image 54: extracted visual asset on page 236] [Image 55: extracted visual asset on page 237] [Image 56: extracted visual asset on page 255] [Image 57: extracted visual asset on page 265] [Image 58: extracted visual asset on page 265] [Image 59: extracted visual asset on page 275] [Image 60: extracted visual asset on page 275] [Image 61: extracted visual asset on page 275] [Image 62: extracted visual asset on page 276] [Image 63: extracted visual asset on page 276] [Image 64: extracted visual asset on page 279] [Image 65: extracted visual asset on page 280] [Image 66: extracted visual asset on page 281] [Image 67: extracted visual asset on page 282] [Image 68: extracted visual asset on page 283] [Image 69: extracted visual asset on page 284] [Image 70: extracted visual asset on page 285] [Image 71: extracted visual asset on page 286] [Image 72: extracted visual asset on page 287] [Image 73: extracted visual asset on page 288] [Image 74: extracted visual asset on page 289] [Image 75: extracted visual asset on page 290] [Image 76: extracted visual asset on page 291] [Image 77: extracted visual asset on page 292] [Image 78: extracted visual asset on page 293] [Image 79: extracted visual asset on page 294] [Image 80: extracted visual asset on page 295] [Image 81: extracted visual asset on page 296] [Image 82: extracted visual asset on page 297] [Image 83: extracted visual asset on page 298] [Image 84: extracted visual asset on page 299] [Image 85: extracted visual asset on page 303] [Image 86: extracted visual asset on page 304] [Image 87: extracted visual asset on page 306] [Image 88: extracted visual asset on page 307] [Image 89: extracted visual asset on page 308] [Image 90: extracted visual asset on page 309] [Image 91: extracted visual asset on page 321] [Image 92: extracted visual asset on page 321]