This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.

DocumentsCorrespondenceMar 7, 2016Pages 30–33

Correspondence – Public submissions and internal responses re Z15-0024 (emails)

Collection of emails received about the rezoning application at 3483 Happy Valley Road, including public objections and a planning department response.

3.b 3.b) PUBLIC HEARING - BYLAW NO. 1613 "Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 447, (3483 Happy Valley Rd), 2015"

Key facts

  • Public comments include opposition from George Burr (919 Lobo Vale) and Jim (Braeburn Ave) citing traffic, character and access concerns
  • Date range of emails around January 2016 (e.g., Jan 1–18, 2016)
  • Planning Director Matthew Baldwin responded indicating the application would be reviewed and that engineering concerns were forwarded
  • Emails captured via City web form and direct submissions

Correspondence – Public submissions and internal responses re Z15-0024 (emails)

From: George Burr

To: Leah Stohmann
Cc: rohan@keycorp.ca
Subject: Rezoning - Z15-0024 - 3483 Happy Valley road
Date: January 18, 2016 9:47:06 AM

To whom it may concern

I oppose the proposal to rezone the RR2 property at 3483 Happy Valley Rd to RT-1 (Townhomes) as presented , and would like to suggest an alternative.

I would support a revised development plan for the property with a mix of about 8 Single Family dwellings on the east side of the property and approximately 16 Townhomes to the west side nearest Happy Valley Road. My reasoning for mixed SFD and Townhomes is that the current surrounding development called Katies Pond reflect that land use as do others. Townhomes are most often placed near Happy Valley Road.

I also suggest that the large home on the property be moved to another location. It will no longer fit the character of the neighbourhood. Having It surrounded by townhomes is not appropriate. This would also result in the addition of about 4 townhomes, helping the economic viability of the development.

Thank you in advance for considering this revised proposal.

George Burr
919 Lobo Vale
Victoria BC V9C 0H8
Cell:778 677 2063
Email: George_burr@telus.net


From: Matthew Baldwin

To: Mrdry@telus.net
Cc: Suzette Chapman
Subject: RE: Community Planning, Land Use and Affordable Housing
Date: January 4, 2016 8:22:09 AM
Attachments: image001.gif

Good morning Jim,

Thank you for your email in regards to the rezoning application for 3483 Happy Valley Road. Although you have likely by now received a notice from our office indicating that this application will be reviewed by Council’s Planning Zoning and Affordable Housing Committee on January 18th, I expect that this application will be held over to a future committee meeting as the applicant continues to refine the plan of development.

I am forwarding your concerns regarding traffic, and signalization to the City’s Engineer, and I am forwarding your concerns about engine brakes to the City’s Manager of Community Safety and Municipal Enforcement.

If you have any further questions, comments or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me here.

Sincerely,

Matthew G. S. Baldwin, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning

CITY OF LANGFORD
2nd floor, 877 Goldstream Ave.
Langford, BC V9B 2X8

T (250) 474-6919 · F (250) 391-3436

www.cityoflangford.ca

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

PLEASE NOTE: This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or organization to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and prohibited from disclosure under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and other applicable laws. Any other reproduction, distribution or disclosure is strictly prohibited.

From: Mrdry@telus.net [mailto:Mrdry@telus.net]
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 11:03 AM


To: Langford Planning General Mailbox planning@cityoflangford.ca

Subject: Community Planning, Land Use and Affordable Housing

You have received an email from Jim via the Langford website contact us form
Name: Jim
Email: Mrdry@telus.net
Phone: 250 915 9290
Address: 1024 Braeburn ave
Message:
Why would you access new town house project off lobo and not happy valley road you should put light at Braeburn and happy valley road you should inforfoce gravel trucks using jake brakes when stopping at Braeburn and happy valley road


From: Sharon Martin on behalf of Langford Administration General Mailbox

To: csheppt@gmail.com
Cc: Langford Planning General Mailbox
Subject: RE: Department Directory - Planning - Zoning Z15-0024 and OCP15-0003
Date: January 4, 2016 3:46:55 PM

Good afternoon Todd,
This is to acknowledge receipt of your email and to advise that it has been forwarded to the Planning Department for their review and response.

Sharon Martin
Administration

From: csheppt@gmail.com [mailto:csheppt@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 1:04 PM
To: Langford Administration General Mailbox administration@cityoflangford.ca
Subject: Department Directory - Planning - Zoning Z15-0024 and OCP15-0003

You have received an email from Todd Sheppard via the Langford website:
Department: Planning
Name: Todd Sheppard
Phone: 250-415-2784
Address: 1061 Braeburn ave.
Topic: Zoning Z15-0024 and OCP15-0003
Message:
In reference to the re-zoning application for 3483 Happy valley road. I am against this application. We purchased 1061 Braeburn in July 2014. We were mislead by the developer that ours was the last house in Katie's pond. In Sept of 2014 MCCormick meadows started. Ever since there has been a steady flow of speeders, construction trucks driving over my lawn. ( Rohan Rupf stated they would fix lawn. Never happened.). This developer is constantly misleading perspective home purchasers in order to grow their business. The last thing we need is another 28 town home units jammed into an area that should have 15 maximum. Can the City of Langford think of the future and slow down the development and concentrate on traffic congestion and ensuring builders such as Key Corp and their subs to build proper housing. I am unable to attend this meeting and I am also certain they will be approved as this is just a formality. Very disappointed I moved to Langford.

Page 30–33
Extracted from: 20160307-Agenda-Package_optimized(229 pages total)