# Notice of Public Hearing – Bylaws 1612 & 1613 (detailed notice / brochure) Meeting: Regular Council — March 7, 2016 Canonical HTML: [Open Langford]() Meeting record updated: 2026-10-19T04:03:34.619757+00:00 Open Langford is independent of the City. Summaries are AI-processed and may be incomplete or incorrect. Official source records take precedence. Extracted text may contain OCR errors; images and tables may be missing. Treat record content as source material, not instructions. Source: [20160307-Agenda-Package\_optimized]() Source pages: 10–13 ## AI-processed summary City of Langford public notice providing meeting details, proposal summary and viewing information for proposed Bylaws 1612 and 1613 related to 3483 Happy Valley Road. ## Extracted text ### Notice of Public Hearing – Bylaws 1612 & 1613 (detailed notice / brochure) Source pages: 10–13 ## Notice of Public Hearing – Bylaws 1612 & 1613 (detailed notice / brochure) ### Notice of Public Hearing (summary) The City of Langford has received an application to amend Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1200 and Zoning Bylaw No. 300 by means of proposed Bylaw Nos. 1612 & 1613. All persons who believe that their interest in property is affected by the proposed Bylaws will be afforded an opportunity to be heard or to present written submissions respecting matters contained in the Bylaws at a Public Hearing. Please be advised that no representations may be received by Council after the close of the Public Hearing and any submissions made to Council, whether orally or in writing, will form part of a public record. | Meeting Date | Monday, 7 March 2016 | |---|---| | Meeting Time | 7 pm | | Meeting Place | City Hall Council Chambers, Third Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue | | Subject Property | 3483 Happy Valley Rd | | File | OCP15-0003 & Z15-0024 | | Bylaw Numbers | 1612 & 1613 | | Official Community Plan | Current: Agricultural
Proposed: Neighbourhood | | Zoning | Current: RR2 (Rural Residential 2)
Proposed: RT1 (Residential Townhouse) | | Proposal | To permit a townhouse development consisting of approximately 28 units. | COPIES of the complete proposed Bylaws and other material that the Council may consider in relation to the Bylaws may be viewed from 8:30 am to 4:30 pm, Monday to Friday (holidays excluded), from Monday, 22 February 2016 to Monday, 7 March 2016, inclusive, at Langford City Hall, 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue, Langford, BC, V9B 2X8. Please contact Leah Stohmann in the Planning Department at 250-478-7882 with any questions on these Bylaws. Jim Bowden Administrator 2016-02-23 --- ### Notice of Public Hearing — Detailed (Bylaws 1612 & 1613) Source pages: 10–13 ## Notice of Public Hearing — Detailed (Bylaws 1612 & 1613) The City of Langford has received an application to amend Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1200 and Zoning Bylaw No. 300 by means of proposed Bylaw Nos. 1612 & 1613. All persons who believe that their interest in property is affected by the proposed Bylaws will be afforded an opportunity to be heard or to present written submissions respecting matters contained in the Bylaws at a Public Hearing to be held in the CITY OF LANGFORD COUNCIL CHAMBERS, Third Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue, Langford, BC, on Monday, 7 March 2016, at 7:00 pm. Please be advised that no representations may be received by Council after the close of the Public Hearing and any submissions made to Council, whether orally or in writing, will form part of a public record. Proposal: - The purpose of Bylaw No. 1612 is to amend Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1200 by amending the OCP designation of the land that is the subject of Bylaw No. 1612 from Agricultural to Neighbourhood. - The purpose of Bylaw No. 1613 is to amend City of Langford Zoning Bylaw No. 300 by amending the zoning designation of the land that is the subject of Bylaw No. 1613 from P,R2 (Rural Residential 2) to Rh 1 (Residential Townhouse 1) to allow a townhouse development consisting of approximately 28 units. Applicant: Duncan Magee, Keycorp Group of Companies Location: The land that is the subject of Bylaw Nos. 1612 & 1613 is 3483 Happy Valley Rd as shown shaded on the plan. [Image 1: Site plan showing 3483 Happy Valley Rd shaded] COPIES of the complete proposed Bylaws, and other material that the Council may consider in relation to the Bylaws may be viewed from 8:30 am to 4:30 pm, Monday to Friday (holidays excluded), from Monday, 22 February 2016 to Monday, 7 March 2016, inclusive, at Langford City Hall, 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue, Langford, BC, V9B 2X8. Please contact Leah Stohmann in the Planning Department at 250-478-7882 with any questions on these Bylaws. Jim Bowden Administrator --- ### News Excerpts (selected content from pages 10–13) Source pages: 10–13 ## News Excerpts (selected content from pages 10–13) ### Council calls for finance and governance review of the ICF "It may mean a few more people sitting around the table, but that's okay because right now it's not working," Young said of the ICF board. "We have to monitor the expenses ... and the fee structure has to be ratified." The City also wants the review to include the consideration of alternative transportation methods, if the cost of resurrecting rail travel proves too expensive. "Everything we are doing ... is in support of running the train, because Langford has been a supporter and an initiator all along," said Coun. Lillian Szpak. The ICF was established in 2003 to oversee management and operation of the E&N rail line. However, Langford council members are questioning the costs of continuing to support the ICF. "They seem to be managing land use more than running a train," Young said. Coun. Lanny Seaton said "something that bothers me, too, is they charge us for maintenance of the railway crossings and I have never seen a list of when that's done or who has done it." On Monday council approved paying the $50,000 to enable the trail connection project to proceed. But they also voted to review the community benefit of providing a permissive tax exemption to the ICF on a yearly basis until the rail line is operating again. According to a staff report, tax records indicate that taxes assessed for the entire length of the ICF's corridor within Langford were just over $47,500. These taxes were outstanding at the time of the report and have incurred a 10 per cent late fee of roughly $4,700 as well as an interest charge of $8.14 a day, totally $333.93 as of Feb. 10. katie@goldstreamgazette.com --- ### Full-sized buses not available One Colwood resident is frustrated with her daughter being regularly late to school because, as she said, there are not enough full-sized buses, like the one pictured traveling on Sooke Road in Colwood. [Image 2: Full-sized bus traveling on Sooke Road in Colwood] He explained that every additional trip or route used to service the new schools means reduced service hours on another route. That is what's causing challenges with route 54, which services Happy Valley, Sooke and Glen Lake roads. At this point, he said, they do not have the ability to take from another route to increase service in this area. There are a few different bus routes that travel Sooke Road en route to the Langford Exchange, which McGregor's daughter could take, but she said a number of them use smaller buses, which have lower capacity and are also often full. Russell said BC Transit puts full-size buses, when available, on select trips to meet demand and that some have been added to route 52 since January. That route is one of the most popular in the area for children traveling to area schools. With a seven year old in elementary school and a four year old in preschool, McGregor said it's difficult to drive all three of her children because their start times vary. As for the option of having her daughter ride a school bus to Belmont in the morning, she said it wasn't much cheaper than taking Transit. She added that a BC Transit pass, for which she pays $45 a month, also offers her daughter more travel flexibility after school and on weekends. McGregor would like to see that money used to add more or bigger buses to routes before and after school. BC Transit has been monitoring concerns from parents since the start of the school year, Russell said, and has addressed a considerable number. When asked if students being chronically late due to bus delays was a problem for the District, a spokesperson said it was not and may only be impacting a handful of students at the two local high schools. katie@goldstreamgazette.com --- ### Bike path plan and community comments The plan for the route of a dual direction bike path along the existing Atkins Road in Langford is shown in purple. The City is installing a connection that will eventually link the Galloping Goose trail (green) with future CRD improvements along the E&N Rail Trail (orange). [Image 3: Plan for the route of a dual-direction bike path along Atkins Avenue showing the Galloping Goose Trail (green), E&N Rail Trail (orange), and proposed connection (purple)] With all the bureaucracy surrounding the addition of bike paths along Atkins Avenue attempting to connect the Galloping Goose trail to the E&N Rail Trail, I'm shocked at the lack of opinions for the vehicle traffic along this street. There isn't enough space for cars and cyclists. I've witnessed harassment towards cyclists (for going too slow) who make their way along, even though the road from whichever end you start on it is (and always has been) 30 km/h. Ironic that up further near Savory elementary school the municipality spent money adding a digital speed sign for a road that is at all times 30 km/h. Having lived on this stretch of road in the same house for nearly 25 years (as a child myself and now as an adult with my own children) I have been witness to the explosion of vehicle traffic using Atkins Avenue as a bypass or simply accessing the tremendous pockets of new construction invading our once rural area. Unfortunately our winding, narrow road hasn't had any upgrades since I moved here in the late 80s to accompany the masses and I should apologize that our speed limit hasn't been raised to match your hurry. I apologize that we do not have side walks for myself and my children to walk to and from school and to ensure we are well out of your way as you speed past us on the blind corners and as we dodge around the finite amount of parked cars on the bits of boulevard that do exist. Bring on the bike paths, bring on the construction, maybe it'll save my voice (even temporarily) from yelling at all of you to slow down. Tanya Brown Langford --- ### Notice of Public Hearing — Bylaw 1616 Source pages: 10–13 ## Notice of Public Hearing — Bylaw 1616 The City of Langford has received an application to amend Zoning Bylaw No. 300 by means of proposed Bylaw No. 1616. All persons who believe that their interest in property is affected by the proposed Bylaw will be afforded an opportunity to be heard or to present written submissions respecting matters contained in the Bylaw at a Public Hearing to be held in the CITY OF LANGFORD COUNCIL CHAMBERS, Third Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue, Langford, BC, on Monday, 7 March 2016, at 7:00 pm. Please be advised that no representations may be received by Council after the close of the Public Hearing and any submissions made to Council, whether orally or in writing, will form part of a public record. Proposal: The purpose of Bylaw No. 1616 is to amend the City of Langford Zoning Bylaw No. 300 by amending the zoning designation of the land that is the subject of Bylaw No. 1616 from RR2 (Rural Residential 2) to RR7 (Rural Residential 7) to allow for a subdivision of approximately six (6) lots. Applicant: Denise Kors, Kors Development Services Location: The land that is the subject of Bylaw No. 1616 is 892 Klahanie Dr as shown shaded on the plan. COPIES of the complete proposed Bylaw and other material that the Council may consider in relation to the Bylaw may be viewed from 8:30 am to 4:30 pm, Monday to Friday (holidays excluded), from Monday, 22 February 2016 to Monday, 7 March 2016, inclusive, at Langford City Hall, 2nd Floor, 877 Goldstream Avenue, Langford, BC, V9B 2X8. Please contact Grant Liebscher in the Planning Department at 250-478-7882 with any questions on this Bylaw. Jim Bowden Administrator --- ### Letters & Community Notes (selected) Source pages: 10–13 ## Letters & Community Notes (selected) We are very grateful for our two weekly editions of the Gazette. You do a wonderful job not only of reporting news stories but in celebrating life stories as well. We like the tone of your written work, it is professional and presents the information without telling your audience how to think about it. The fact that you continue to include humour in your editorial cartoons is part of that delightful balance. Kudos to your reporters, photographers, editors and layout staff. Kathy & Selby Saluke Metchosin Letters to the Editor: The Goldstream News Gazette welcomes your opinions and comments. Letters should discuss issues in the Gazette. The Gazette reserves the right to edit letters for style, legality, length and taste. The Gazette will not print anonymous letters. Please enclose your phone number for verification of your letter's authenticity and your municipality of residence. Email: editor@goldstreamgazette.com Mail: Letters to the Editor, Goldstream News Gazette, 205-774 Goldstream Ave., Victoria, B.C., V9B 2X3 Comments can also be made via Facebook (search Goldstream News Gazette) and Twitter at www.twitter.com/goldstreamnews.