MattersPublic SafetyFirst seen Dec 21, 2022Last discussed Dec 5, 2023
Public spaces bylaw amendments
Proposed changes concerned the city’s parks and traffic rules, including public-space regulations. Public input raised concerns about unhoused people and where overnight camping should be permitted; the available record does not detail the specific changes.
Where it stands: Amendments considered Nov 21, 2023; no decision is recorded.
Background
Earlier and later steps of the same initiative.
Timeline
Every time this matter appeared in council records, newest first.
- Mike Wignell (Sullivan Road)Mixed · Bistro, fire engine, and parks bylaws
Supports the bistro expansion and fire-engine donation, but questions whether park-hour changes help and urges humane facilities and services for unhoused residents. - Lisa Foxhall (Players Drive)Concerned · Parks bylaws and encampments
Raises concerns about downtown safety and asks council for a substantive response to encampments rather than a bylaw-enforcement stopgap. - Sandy Seifert (Walford Road)Asks · Parks bylaw 177
Requests a concrete long-term response to park encampments and an update on the park-naming bylaw. - Mickey Audison (Machosen Road)Asks · Parks bylaw 177
Requests a temporary halt to confiscating shelter and belongings during extreme-weather events and urges council to follow relevant housing and encampment guidance. - Kyle Volikovsky (Walford Road) · Agenda item 11.1
Offers to answer council questions about agenda item 11.1. - Dave A. (Nicholas Drive)Asks · Parks bylaws and encampments
Requests bathrooms, running water, regional support, and a long-term plan instead of earlier park clearings.
- Mike Wignell (Sullivan Road)Mixed · Bistro, fire engine, and parks bylaws
- Wendy Hobbes (Luxton Road)Asks · Strategic plan and other agenda items
Asks council to hold a town hall on the strategic plan and strengthen public engagement across several agenda items. - M. Wignell (Selwyn Road)Concerned · Public spaces bylaw
Warns proposed sheltering rules will not address impacts on nearby businesses and residents, and suggests toilets or alternative shelter arrangements. - Barb Pretty (Massey Drive)Concerned · Danbrook Park sheltering
Describes ongoing safety and quality-of-life impacts near Danbrook Park and argues bylaw changes or added bylaw officers will not resolve them. - M. Barry (Massey Drive)Asks · Strategic plan and parks bylaw
Asks council to move ahead with the strategic plan and consider nearby ground-floor residences when setting shelter locations. - L. Plomp (Winfield Drive)Supports · Park dedication and other agenda items
Supports a natural pocket park, CRD borrowing for the RCMP facility, proposed sheltering changes, strategic-plan outreach, and lane-use fees. - Norman Joel (Langford)Asks · RCMP facility and public-space enforcement
Asks council to direct resources to RCMP rather than bylaw officers and to stop delaying the RCMP facility project. - Lisa FoxhallMixed · RCMP facility and public spaces bylaw
Supports the RCMP facility and calls the proposed bylaw staffing a band-aid, advocating police officers to address neighborhood safety concerns. - Nicholas Joel (Walford Place)Concerned · RCMP staffing
Raises concerns about community safety and asks whether council requested additional RCMP officers from Ottawa on schedule. - S. Plank (Goldstream Avenue)Mixed · RCMP borrowing, lane closure, and strategic plan
Supports CRD borrowing and renter priorities, seeks a shorter lane closure, and asks council to reframe homelessness and improve public engagement. - B. King (Langford)Mixed · Strategic plan and public spaces bylaw
Welcomes improved engagement and renter inclusion, and asks council to address public-safety concerns while recognizing unhoused people’s needs and dignity. - A residentMixed · Public spaces bylaw and RCMP borrowing
Supports seven-to-seven sheltering hours and is cautiously open to CRD borrowing, while asking for a separate tax line item.
- Wendy Hobbes (Luxton Road)Asks · Strategic plan and other agenda items
- Mike Wignall (Lankford)Concerned · Tree-protection bylaws 2115 and 2116
Criticizes the rushed public process and asks for resident consultation on the temporary tree bylaw. - Sarah Plank (Goldstream Avenue)Supports · Tree-protection bylaw
Supports the temporary bylaw and fines to deter tree removal while a permanent bylaw undergoes public consultation. - Randy Luberts (Dane Hill Place)Supports · Tree-protection bylaws 2115 and 2116
Supports both temporary bylaws and urges public involvement in developing permanent protections for environmental and personal-health benefits. - Joel Leodakis (Page Avenue)Opposes · Tree-protection bylaw
Opposes the rushed bylaw, citing existing development-permit protections and concerns about costs, delays, consultation, and private property impacts.
- Mike Wignall (Lankford)Concerned · Tree-protection bylaws 2115 and 2116